777 died in nyc today....while California is at ZERO

[Easy-E]

 

[kingjones29]

Did New York get hit with the Italy strain or what? This is horrible

It’s possible nyc is close to Europe and this is the first place tourist go to

 

[UberEatsDriver]

You been driving down eastern parkway I see lol

I live in Midwood but I’ve seen the videos showing the Jews in borough park

 

[UberEatsDriver]

how many people live within a certain amount of mile radius is considered more dense in California, specifically Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Jose areas.

there is your rational and non confrontational argument. happy now ?

and on top of that I didn’t disagree with you. I was trying to understand where you and the other poster were getting info from.

 

[MarcP]

Did New York get hit with the Italy strain or what? This is horrible

If you looked at the influenza stats I'm sure NY leads in that as well. Even if you try to social distance you have to walk through the hallways with that rona potentially lingering just to get outside of your building and then you're probably walking on a crowded street or getting on a packed subway. Its practically an inevitability that you're going to get it. The number of asymptomatic people who had/have it and don't/didn't know it in NY is probably astronomical breh.

 

[UberEatsDriver]

Maybe Cuomo is right. Gotta remember Jews and Hood nikkas don’t make up the majority of hoods in nyc

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

How Nicole catch a stray

 

[Unknown Poster]

New york and London both getting hit hard
that new york to london flight one of the busiest and most popular in the world and both cities people use transit alot

I got family in both that's why I been worried.

 

[No1]

the west coast is designed differently than New York.. as clear examples, New York counts all 5 burroughs in its stats in almost 100% of anything when it wants to prove a point no other city is designed like that, as any other state would count them as 5 different cities..

which is complete non sense to a west coast person because we base our shyt on an individual city basis but if it comes down to just pure population of lumping people together then we use metropolitan for stats because end of day its all about how many people live in a certain area if you remove NYC ridiculous 5 burroughs combined as power rangers as 1 city or Los Angeles/ San Francisco metropolitan maps, California is more populated density no matter how you want to carve the wording up

This is a nonsensical ass post. New York City is literally one city, why the fukk would you break it up for the purposes of determining density when it is quite literally one large ass city? You know how many large ass cities like that there are in the world? There isn’t a single US metro area that ranks in the top 50 in world density. Mexico City literally has 17 million people. The New York metropolitan area includes parts of New Jersey and Yonkers if you want to go that route. You literally just compared an actual incorporated city to an entire metropolitan area and thought that made sense. Then you went and said that we should compare city to city after doing the exact opposite to make your point.

New York City 28,000 people per square mile. LA has around 8,500 and San Francisco is somewhere between 11 and 12,000. It’s not remotely the same.

 

[Low End Derrick]

I’m responding to your troll comment after the link.

lmfao

how is your reply to me with this...

It’s always funny when losers like yourself have to go global to beat NyC in anything. Your article clearly says NYC is the number one visited city in America.

That’s why you’re truly Mad.

...connected to this lighthearted jibe, in which i never once mentioned "the world" or "global" or anything to that effect?

let's face facts: if ny wasnt full of dusty, knuckleheaded, conspiracy theorists like @Nicole0416, this shyt would've been deaded by now. instead, because of them, we got the worst health crisis in history.

you hate to see it.

look, i get why you're mad at my post, but don't try to move goalposts when arguing and come with facts next time, my guy.

 

[Hersh]

what r the numbers now?

 

[itsyoung!!]

The New York metropolitan area includes parts of New Jersey and Yonkers if you want to go that route.

it included that route in the article. Still #5

New York City 28,000 people per square mile. LA has around 8,500 and San Francisco is somewhere between 11 and 12,000. It’s not remotely the same.

you're comparing 5 burroughs of land mass to individual cities. non sense.

California areas, per mile are dense than new york areas per mile

deal with it

 

[Dameon Farrow]

This needs to come to an end

Pack a lunch. We didn't do enough in the beginning. We didn't do enough once it became serious.

And with the airwaves pushing this 'peak' talk people are about to become even more relaxed opening the door for another spike some.

Upside I'll be able to find rubbing alcohol in stores again.

 

[Dreamchaser]

Thankful to the governor and city officials that acted quickly in California. The thing is in the Bay Area when they reported that there was community spread on Feb 28 companies took notice and within the same week, my job and many others in the bay area made WFH required. That's before San Francisco stepped up on March 6 with social distancing order. I think that's been the real difference with why the virus is hammering NYC and not California for the most part.

 

[HabitualChiller]

it included that route in the article. Still #5



you're comparing 5 burroughs of land mass to individual cities. non sense.

California areas, per mile are dense than new york areas per mile

deal with it

Wait, what?