777 died in nyc today....while California is at ZERO

The Amerikkkan Idol

The Amerikkkan Nightmare
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
14,373
Reputation
3,939
Daps
38,577
I was riding the subway in NY a few years back, and I was appalled at the amount of people eating food with their bare hands.
:scusthov:

Not saying people in other cities don't do this, but it seemed to be a lot more routine there. Spanish lady eating pieces of fruit, Black girl eating chips, White dude grabbing Cheerios out a sandwich bag and feeding it to his toddler.
:dahell:

ZTsSXze.png
I hate that shyt.

I will never understand motherfukkers who eat without washing their damn hands. :damn:
 

Greenhornet

A God Among Kings
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,369
Reputation
2,810
Daps
26,727
Reppin
Rochester Ny
watching dude argue about population density and juelz and redefine whatever fit some chronic inspired argument was probably the dumbest shyt ive witnessed in 16 years on the coli

whether you twisted it to fit your logic or not, you are speaking just to do it :russ: like dude said about hyper density or whatever.... you are just talking to talk.... comparing sprawling suburbs to mad dirty people crammed together ontop of eachother. nikka leaving your building in NYC is a huge threat compared to chilling in the suburbs 100 ft away from your neighbor :mjlol: I live in the suburbs and nobody out here is stressing out over some people who live mad far away. You are also slyly reducing the fact that a suburban house is holding 5 people or more compared to a studio apartment in NYC, I know you see the truth or whatever... but arguing the fact that your surface population 300square miles has more people is still irrelevant as far as interaction and contact...which is the whole point of this thread.

Besides the corona shyt... I live in a shytty upstate NY city. Surrounded by a handful of huge suburbs
I could easily say the suburbs population is way higher than the city... because obviously I would have the advantage comparing residential area to the focused center where everyone congregates
Thats why you got people saying you could add in Hanover and NJ and shyt to NYC also


what all of yall need to realize and talk about is the fact that it could get ALOT worse for NYC ... while you are talking about this borough or that. shyt could wipe out 10 story buildings full of families... If it does hit manhattan hard it would be devastating completel. Whether you want to play games and talk about suburban areas full of evenly distanced families you are missing the entire point of the thread to be correct. If you're in a 40 story building with stairs and an elevator ... you are about to chance going in and out that bytch with the whole 40 story population inside being clean? Just to get in a taxi or on one of those 900% infected subway cars?
 

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,431
Reputation
6,336
Daps
140,302
Not in comparison to Chicago and New York. People in L.A. and even in San Francisco are more spread out than people are in New York and Chicago.
in regards to density they are not even that spread out IMO.

went to LA and felt like so many people were on top of me.

theirs levels to this density shyt:wow:
 

Soylent Greenz

All Star
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
1,506
Reputation
440
Daps
5,393
Reppin
Brooklyn
we need 4 million less people here easily.

Exactly.

And to be honest,a good portion of people cant afford to live here and are subsidized indefinitely.
Without Government/state help,there would easily be less people here,moving on to places where their income actually dictated their living situations.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,540
Daps
110,448
Reppin
Bay Area
The two of you are arguing about two different things. You’re “defending” New York and its density, referencing only actual cities (City limits). He already agrees that as a city, New York is the densest. The point that he’s making is that with regard to COVID-19, speaking about the actual city and its city limits is pointless if you are comparing density and how COVID-19 can be transmitted. If you compare the size of New York to the same size of land in the Bay Area, then the Bay Area is more dense.

New York has boroughs, but is all one city. Other American cities tend to have smaller central cities and more suburbs that people still consider the city (metro area) for all intents and purposes.

A better argument for you against him would be pointing out that while the Bay Area is more dense in comparison to New York, New York has a level of hyper density that is not present in other cities. Instead, y’all just keep going back and forth about semantics. If neither of you agree what you’re arguing about, there is no point in continuing to go back and forth.

:wow: someone with an actual brain posting in this thread
 

Bboystyle

FIRE MATT LAFLEUR
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
49,276
Reputation
6,539
Daps
82,933
Reppin
So. Cal
The true GOAT left coast state/city = AZ/Phoenix

we aint gotta deal with earthquakes:blessed:, gets hot as fukk:francis: but its cool tho:unimpressed:


Nah. AZ is some scary ass desert shyt. I been to those deserts and the dirt and rocks aint right. How u have volcano rocks just chilling everywhere with no volcanos in sight? :dahell:

Aint no telling what under that ground :lupe:

Rather be an island then ash :francis:
 

Bruce Wayne

THE GODDAMN BILLIONAIRE
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
13,728
Reputation
2,621
Daps
32,935
Reppin
Gotham City
Kentucky met The Spanish Flu in 1918 and Claimed the Lives of Millions as it Continued to Spread within 2 Years and did not show Signs of the end of the Sickness being Spread until Boston was told that it had the Lowest Numbers of Deaths related to The Spanish Flu, Boston saw the light before any other City. It will get better before it gets worse. Unfortunately, New York is getting the worst of it right now until Mankind adapts with a Cure/Vaccine or until the Measures taken to fade the Virus itself given instructions of Social Distancing works... or ...until the Virus itself passes(which I would not count on)
Until then, I am betting on Science to defeat the Virus.
l3kMBma.gif
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,065
Reputation
4,853
Daps
104,534
The two of you are arguing about two different things. You’re “defending” New York and its density, referencing only actual cities (City limits). He already agrees that as a city, New York is the densest. The point that he’s making is that with regard to COVID-19, speaking about the actual city and its city limits is pointless if you are comparing density and how COVID-19 can be transmitted. If you compare the size of New York to the same size of land in the Bay Area, then the Bay Area is more dense.

New York has boroughs, but is all one city. Other American cities tend to have smaller central cities and more suburbs that people still consider the city (metro area) for all intents and purposes.

A better argument for you against him would be pointing out that while the Bay Area is more dense in comparison to New York, New York has a level of hyper density that is not present in other cities. Instead, y’all just keep going back and forth about semantics. If neither of you agree what you’re arguing about, there is no point in continuing to go back and forth.

Except I did do that. You fell victim to that dummy's juelzing.

He tried to complain that it was unfair to compare NYC with its 5 burroughs to individual cities...

you're comparing 5 burroughs of land mass to individual cities. non sense.

California areas, per mile are dense than new york areas per mile

deal with it :umad:
And the post clowning him for that was what I responded to, and that's what triggered him.
So since it was unfair to compare all of NYC to a single city, I did bring up the ultra densely populated Manhattan:
I’m not a New Yorker. Spare me your diatribes and just tell me the area in the US that you think it’s more densely populated than Manhattan. :unimpressed:
Of course, @itsjuelz!! then wanted then wants to keep NYC as a single city, but expand the area of other cities...which is retarded and arbitrary and loses the spirit of what's being discussed (the transmission of COVID-19 and ultra densely populated areas).


Dude's whole premise is just stupid. He wants to extend SF beyond the city limits to include the metro area, but only include NYC proper. Utterly retarded. If you extend to the metro areas and compare San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland metro area it has wayyy more land area, yet less people than the NYC metro area (barely more than NYC proper). LA also has a bigger metro land area, yet less people than the NYC metro area.

If you compare the size of New York to the same size of land in the Bay Area, then the Bay Area is more dense.
Given the fact that NYC has over 8 million people in its city proper of 300 sq mi, and the Bay Area has about 9.6 million in its 13,000 sq mi, explain to me why you think this is a true statement. :unimpressed:
 
Last edited:

MenacingMonk

War & Peace
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
66,398
Reputation
8,776
Daps
143,322
Reppin
West where the Sunsets
Breh I'm so proud of our state and local government right now.

These a$$holes are still passing along the fear though. Saying we're "a week behind" NY. They said that 2 weeks ago. :stopitslime:

Now it's "this week is crucial to not go out." Week is almost over and we're still consistent with the cases/deaths. What's it gonna be next week? :martin:

I'm confident we won't hit mid to high triple digits in deaths. :ld:
 

Contrefaire

Superstar
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
4,230
Reputation
1,529
Daps
19,542
Reppin
West Coast
San Francisco and LA are “dense” cities. Kind of contradicting.

Our cities are "dense" but in general we don't live damn near on top of each other like they do in places like NYC.

We also lack any kind of cohesive public transport system which in good times means we're embarrassingly behind the curve, but in times like this means we're actually better suited to lessen or even halt the spread of viruses.
 
Top