99% of Women say no regret after abortion

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,110
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Amestafuu (Emeritus) said:
Were talking about abortion as a option to avoiding unwanted children.

Abortions shouldn't be a substitute for common sense. If you don't want children, don't have sex. If you do have sex, use protection and choose better partners.​

Women using abortions as birth control (which is the majority) are just murderers that don't want to be held responsible for THEIR poor decisions leading up to the end of a human life.​
 

analog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
5,445
Reputation
1,213
Daps
21,775
Reppin
Toronto
The conclusion is that all children should get a chance at life.

Nothing in life is guaranteed. By the statistics that dude should have had a miserable life but he succeeded.

Not only did he succeed, he succeeded in a way where he can impact and better the lives of many people in his orbit. Those type of people don't come along often.

We're always looking for black saviors and people to do things for black people as a whole or to better conditions for us, well the truth of the matter is, we probably murdered most of them in the womb
Our children aren't precocial. They require a lot of care for a long period. Forcing women to dump a baby into a dumpster is not a viable option even though there's a slim chance they may turn out to be a success.

You mentioned accountability earlier. There's none of it here when a woman can dispose of a live child. What has she learned from that, and what's going to keep her from making the same mistake? At best the burden is shifted to foster/adoptive parents/communal facility. At worse, that baby suffers on its way to passing. Those are gambles you may be willing to take, (an easy gamble at that since you personally won't bear the responsibility for that life), but I am not.
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
49,383
Reputation
21,773
Daps
198,286
your womb probably looking like the graveyard simba and nala fukked around and got lost in:scust:
I'm sorry but I left stupid people and stupid conversations in 2019. Imma have to block you. I can't take a manchild seriously who makes lion king abortion jokes. Either you are extra young or extra remedial.
 

analog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
5,445
Reputation
1,213
Daps
21,775
Reppin
Toronto
Bruh, you should be obligated to raise something you made

if we're saying a woman can unilaterally decide to murder a baby or not, a man should be able to opt out of raising that child

If you have the right to abort it, I should have the right to abandon it.

Both parties should have the right to abort after conception or no one should have it:unimpressed:
So, wait... are y'all saying you're pro choice so long as you have an option to absolve yourself of any responsibility? Interesting :jbhmm:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,110
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
analog said:
Forcing women to dump a baby into a dumpster is not a viable option even though there's a slim chance they may turn out to be a success.

They aren't forced to do that, though. They CHOOSE to do that. Big difference.​

analog said:
There's none of it here when a woman can dispose of a live child. What has she learned from that, and what's going to keep her from making the same mistake?

That's the same argument anti-abortion folks advance. If she can pay a couple hundred dollars and absolve herself of any future responsibiilty, what has she learned?​

People keep getting speeding tickets, pay the fine, and continue speeding. As long as they can afford the tickets, their behavior won't change. They need to understand that speeding is WRONG.​
 

analog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
5,445
Reputation
1,213
Daps
21,775
Reppin
Toronto
Yeah. What's wrong with having all things equal? :jbhmm:
I just found it interesting people on the pro-life said can be swayed by waiving child support requirements. Appealing to self interest prevails :ehh:


They aren't forced to do that, though. They CHOOSE to do that. Big difference.​
We aren't forced to deny them an abortion either. A woman has the freedom to engage in intercourse as she sees fit, who are we to bear the consequence as WE see fit? In the interest of not having babies thrown in dumpsters, allow her to abort a child if she doesn't want it.

That's the same argument anti-abortion folks advance. If she can pay a couple hundred dollars and absolve herself of any future responsibiilty, what has she learned?

People keep getting speeding tickets, pay the fine, and continue speeding. As long as they can afford the tickets, their behavior won't change. They need to understand that speeding is WRONG.​
The other poster cited accountability, I was just responding to that.

My primary interest is not bringing babies into this world when the parents have no desire to. I'm all for better (sexual) education, accessible contraceptions, etc. so folks understand the repercussions of their actions like you said and can make better informed decisions in their life. This'd also result in fewer incidents of aborted children without removing choice in a heavy handed manner.
 

Mike809

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
17,161
Reputation
4,674
Daps
87,972
Reppin
Bronx
If I'm understanding you correctly you think that abortion wouldn't be stigmatized if it was men in the situation and that's some bullshyt. Men would just be expected to man up and deal with it like they are told to do with everything else.
Men cant even man up to raise a kid with another woman , and now you think they going to man up to go through all the shyt single mothers do ? Some would and some would get abortions like women do.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,110
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
analog said:
We aren't forced to deny them an abortion either.

If they substitute it for birth control, we should. Murder is murder.​

analog said:
A woman has the freedom to engage in intercourse as she sees fit, who are we to bear the consequence as WE see fit? In the interest of not having babies thrown in dumpsters, allow her to abort a child if she doesn't want it.

There's no difference between the two choices aside from one being legal murder. If she didn't want a child, she should have used protection or abstained.​

analog said:
My primary interest is not bringing babies into this world when the parents have no desire to.

If the parents didn't want children, then protection/abstaining from sex are choices that don't involve murder.​

analog said:
I'm all for better (sexual) education, accessible contraceptions, etc. so folks understand the repercussions of their actions like you said and can make better informed decisions in their life. This'd also result in fewer incidents of aborted children without removing choice in a heavy handed manner.

You know what'd really stop unwanted pregnancies? Not getting pregnant in the first place. Sex ed should include abstaining as a priority, but it doesn't. Instead, they are given dozens of choices to engage in activities that ultimately result in the creation of a human being without any responsibility for that life that they created because murder is legal as long as it's performed by a doctor.​
 
Top