99% of Women say no regret after abortion

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,154
Reputation
8,035
Daps
100,036
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
I dunno how you can not regret that shyt.

A girl had an abortion for me straight outta high school and I still think about that shyt sometimes. Especially when I look at my son now. That shyt feels awful to know my kid never even got a chance at life because we decided it would fukk up our life style.

But I guess I can see the counter argument....sorta. :yeshrug:
What if your son now, is the son that you aborted :whoo:
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,154
Reputation
8,035
Daps
100,036
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
You know what'd really stop unwanted pregnancies? Not getting pregnant in the first place. Sex ed should include abstaining as a priority, but it doesn't. Instead, they are given dozens of choices to engage in activities that ultimately result in the creation of a human being without any responsibility for that life that they created because murder is legal as long as it's performed by a doctor.​
This is a complete lie that could have been answered with a simple Google search.. Government already reports on all these factors and determined that abstinence only teaching leads to HIGHER pregnancy rates. You are COMPLETELY wrong and 180 degrees from the truth

Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S



Using the most recent national data (2005) from all U.S. states with information on sex education laws or policies (N = 48), we show that increasing emphasis on abstinence education is positively correlated with teenage pregnancy and birth rates. This trend remains significant after accounting for socioeconomic status, teen educational attainment, ethnic composition of the teen population, and availability of Medicaid waivers for family planning services in each state. These data show clearly that abstinence-only education as a state policy is ineffective in preventing teenage pregnancy and may actually be contributing to the high teenage pregnancy rates in the U.S.



Among the 48 states in this analysis (all U.S. states except North Dakota and Wyoming), 21 states stressed abstinence-only education in their 2005 state laws and/or policies (level 3), 7 states emphasized abstinence education (level 2), 11 states covered abstinence in the context of comprehensive sex education (level 1), and 9 states did not mention abstinence (level 0) in their state laws or policies (Figure 1). In 2005, level 0 states had an average (± standard error) teen pregnancy rate of 58.78 (±4.96), level 1 states averaged 56.36 (±3.94), level 2 states averaged 61.86 (±3.93), and level 3 states averaged 73.24 (±2.58) teen pregnancies per 1000 girls aged 14–19 (Table 3). The level of abstinence education (no provision, covered, promoted, stressed) was positively correlated with both teen pregnancy (Spearman's rho = 0.510, p = 0.001) and teen birth (rho = 0.605, p<0.001) rates (Table 4), indicating that abstinence education in the U.S. does not cause abstinence behavior. To the contrary, teens in states that prescribe more abstinence education are actually more likely to become pregnant (Figure 2).
 

GilSho

Veteran
Joined
May 22, 2014
Messages
15,300
Reputation
2,574
Daps
97,354
Abortion is murder to me, that's why I only fukk with protection. Could never live with myself knowing I killed my child.


No idea why women can't keep their legs closed or force their dikk to use a condom.
 

LiveFromLondon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
8,038
Reputation
520
Daps
18,893
The Anti-Abortion crowd doesn’t give a single fukk about the well being of people born into tension filled households, dysfunction, bad DNA or poverty. Let someone come on here and complain about how miserable they are due to their fukked up family life (because they were born to ppl unfit to be parents) or because of their bad DNA and it would be “man up, you’re ungrateful blah blah blah”

Mind your business. Abortion eliminates the existence of people who would receive a recipe for an unpleasant life. There are probably millions of people across the globe who would forfeit their existence if they were certain there was no spiritual consequences
This a dumb argument because the reasons you stated are part of human life and theres no running away from such hardships and all sound very:mjpls:
 

LiveFromLondon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
8,038
Reputation
520
Daps
18,893
If they don't want a kid fukking up their money and time and life, especially with a nikka they don't want it with
Can we dispel this myth, woman choose whom they want to have children, getting pregnant aint so blahzey as these pro-choie would have you believe.
So keeping you dikk in your pants and wearing protection is too much to ask? You guys never want to be held responsible.
:stopitslime:whos onus is it on for protection considering one is entering the others body and faces a greater burden.

.or they can just take the a male approach to not wanting child.. just run out leaving everyone else to do the job
Dad Beat Dad>>>>>>>baby killer

Ps Margaret Sanger was a Racist eugenist
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,110
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
The Devil's Advocate said:
This is a complete lie that could have been answered with a simple Google search.. Government already reports on all these factors and determined that abstinence only teaching leads to HIGHER pregnancy rates. You are COMPLETELY wrong and 180 degrees from the truth

If you had actually read what I posted, you'd understand my argument was NOT 'abstinence only', but most people arguing against my position have no choice but to be selectively obtuse and quote studies that have nothing to do with it. The studies also don't take into consideration the proliferation of sexual imagery available online which pretty much teaches people that sex is "nothing special".​

Your critique is a strawman and here's why: Sex Ed is NOT just the school's responsibility. The school reinforces values that are taught in the home/community. If the parents haven't taught their children that human life is valuable and the schools don't back them up with the inculcation of those same values, we end up debating not how much value human beings have, but IF they have any value at all....which is the crux of my argument.​

The value that we place on humans has steadily declined as a direct result of devaluing sex. It is just "something humans do". No big deal. Killing a baby is also just something humans do. No big deal.​

Your Google search, and your opinion, is void, sir.​
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
6,885
Reputation
389
Daps
30,091
This a dumb argument because the reasons you stated are part of human life and theres no running away from such hardships and all sound very:mjpls:
This is a worthless post with no logical basis

Anything that makes the human experience unpleasant should be minimized as much as possible especially when it comes to children
 

HellRell804

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,327
Reputation
2,735
Daps
22,910
Reppin
NULL
:russ: I'm noticing the bootstrap crowd and the "abortion is murder crowd" really intersect on this forum. Y'all don't care about life, you want control of people's choices. If you valued life, I don't see it when you talk about the poor or the folks need help.

I bet you felt smart typing this bullshyt.

We're arguing that you should accept responsibility for your actions.

A grown adult is, more often not poor because of a series of bad decisions.

There is absolutely no overlap there

You perpetual children think someone should always be there to protect you from yourself even though a lot of you are over 30 years old. Its pathetic
 

Thanos

?
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
5,447
Reputation
882
Daps
17,301
Reppin
Atlanta
I bet you felt smart typing this bullshyt.

We're arguing that you should accept responsibility for your actions.

A grown adult is, more often not poor because of a series of bad decisions.

There is absolutely no overlap there

You perpetual children think someone should always be there to protect you from yourself even though a lot of you are over 30 years old. Its pathetic

:mjlol: There's overlap and it's ironic especially from the poster.
 

LiveFromLondon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
8,038
Reputation
520
Daps
18,893
This is a worthless post with no logical basis

Anything that makes the human experience unpleasant should be minimized as much as possible especially when it comes to children
Thats makes no sense as one can experience unpleasant things at any given time. Should you be murdered then when that happens, should a child then be murdered because their future looks bleak. Also to your previous point, having rich parents doesn't guarantee a pleasant life, Steve Jobs was allegedly a shytty parent and should he himself been aborted as none of his parents wanted him and not lived to innovate products you and people you know use.

Also how do you determine an unpleasant experience, shouldve all black people been aborted because of racism, which of a child born in a 3rd world country warzone and one born in abject poverty in Manhattan is facing an unpleasant life that justifies abortion, how do you weigh them up to which is worse.
 
Top