Active Shooter in Youtube HQ

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,087
Reputation
3,433
Daps
73,204
Reppin
New York
Vegan animal lover who literally wouldn't hurt a fly is the shooter.
YouTube fukkin' with her $ so she pulled up.
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,382
Reputation
3,482
Daps
74,468
Reppin
NULL
Honestly a good chunk of youtubers need to be demonetized. But that's a story for another day
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,087
Reputation
3,433
Daps
73,204
Reppin
New York
Views is one thing but you got to look at the content. Youtube opened the Pandora's box when they started giving people money with no strict guidelines.
And what would you say the standards should be content wise?
This shooter was anti-animal abuse and a vegan activist. Seems pretty benign to be demonetizing that content.
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,382
Reputation
3,482
Daps
74,468
Reppin
NULL
And what would you say the standards should be content wise?
This shooter was anti-animal abuse and a vegan activist. Seems pretty benign to be demonetizing that content.
Wasn't directed at her just in general. But also we don't know if she was doing something that caused her to be demonetized or if YouTube just made a mistake and instead of making a complaint she shot them up.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,087
Reputation
3,433
Daps
73,204
Reppin
New York
Wasn't directed at her just in general. But also we don't know if she was doing something that caused her to be demonetized or if YouTube just made a mistake and instead of making a complaint she shot them up.
Yeah cool, but again what do you think the standards should be?
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,382
Reputation
3,482
Daps
74,468
Reppin
NULL
:snoop:Dude you came in here claiming ''a good amount of YouTubers need to be demonetized" and now you don't want to say why you think that?
:what:
You asked what the standards should be and I told you that they got them in place meaning I agree with what they got. The problem is putting them in action across the board.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,087
Reputation
3,433
Daps
73,204
Reppin
New York
:what:
You asked what the standards should be and I told you that they got them in place meaning I agree with what they got. The problem is putting them in action across the board.
I only asked because you said ''a good amount should be demonetized". Again why?
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,382
Reputation
3,482
Daps
74,468
Reppin
NULL
I only asked because you said ''a good amount should be demonetized". Again why?
Because it bred shytty content creators like those edgy pranksters, racist/sexist let's players, fake news reporters, etc.
Them being able to get "easy" money can make people wanna go to the extreme trying to copycat one of the guys that have become millionaires.

Getting paid from YouTube is a privilege not a right.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,087
Reputation
3,433
Daps
73,204
Reppin
New York
Because it bred shytty content creators like those edgy pranksters, racist/sexist let's players, fake news reporters, etc.
Them being able to get "easy" money can make people wanna go to the extreme trying to copycat one of the guys that have become millionaires.

Getting paid from YouTube is a privilege not a right.
''shytty" is subjective so that's no a good enough reason. And really like this shooters complaint it is a good way to silence opposing voices while not following your own standards.
 
Top