Active Shooter in Youtube HQ

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,385
Reputation
3,492
Daps
74,472
Reppin
NULL
''shytty" is subjective so that's no a good enough reason. And really like this shooters complaint it is a good way to silence opposing voices while not following your own standards.
You know which ones I'm talking about. stuff like this

Or ones that can be potentially dangerous.
One woman accidentally killed her boyfriend when making a YouTube video.
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,845
Daps
88,335
Reppin
nWg
Also, Youtube doesn't have the manpower to have a human being watch every video and decide if it should be demonetized. They wrote programs to examine video and audio and probably took the money out of this person's stuff because the algorithms detected too much sexy dancing.

So a computer program just made a crazy person go kill people.:francis:
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,489
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,286
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Turned out to be a crazy Persian, Vegan, PETA lady who was mad her youtube videos were de-monetized for being fukking nuts. Her dad called the cops because she had gone missing two days ago. He told them she was mad at Youtube and might go to their office. The cops found her sleeping in her car at 2 AM. They said the situation was under control. Evidently, they didn't search her for a gun.


And her family reported her to authorities beforehand

But you know we're just going to sweep that under the rug :hubie:
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,565
Reputation
5,997
Daps
63,220
Reppin
Knicks
That was my opinion not a fact and I don't know what you mean by ''all the faith". Care to give some examples?
Didn't mean it to come off as an attack, its more of a question I struggle with. Take gun control, for example. Seems paradoxical to me to call for the government to take action against guns when they've shown time and time again that they're not capable of taking action effectively. See: the war on drugs, the war on terror, police brutality, etc.

In a perfect world I agree that America should have far less guns, and its the government job to enforce that. In this world, though, I have little to no faith that they would enforce stricter gun control without they're regular profiling/racism/etc.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,489
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,286
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Didn't mean it to come off as an attack, its more of a question I struggle with. Take gun control, for example. Seems paradoxical to me to call for the government to take action against guns when they've shown time and time again that they're not capable of taking action effectively. See: the war on drugs, the war on terror, police brutality, etc.

In a perfect world I agree that America should have far less guns, and its the government job to enforce that. In this world, though, I have little to no faith that they would enforce stricter gun control without they're regular profiling/racism/etc.
That's why you don't leave people who don't see the action as important in positions of power.....

My point in bringing up the family reporting the threat is to highlight the importance of man power vs technology. Idiots get gassed when they hear in political speeches that the budget is going to provide x amount of dollars to modernize system y. It's the worker shortage within these national security positions that creates these lapses.

Gun control isn't about pushing a new policy across the desk, stepping back, and letting gravity take control. It's about pushing a policy, hiring the right people who believe in the policy, voting out those who don't get the fukkn policy, and removing everyone who wants to undermine the new policy.

The people matter as much as the policy. You have the ACA on the books and it's falling apart because who is in control of the budget? You have Civil Rights laws on the books and no consistency in how they're enforced because who continues to dismantle the Civil Rights division of the DOJ and appoint conservatives to federal court?
Who in their right mind would want a fukkn republican running the cou-:mjlol: never mind.....
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,845
Daps
88,335
Reppin
nWg
The #YouTubeShooter was a woman who used a handgun that was purchased legally in a state with the most stringent gun laws in the nation...

:ohhh:
:heh:you think this means "this proves gun laws don't work" but it actually means gun laws need to be more stringent:demonic:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,104
Reputation
4,485
Daps
89,204
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
:heh:you think this means "this proves gun laws don't work" but it actually means gun laws need to be more stringent:demonic:
:hubie:Just making an observation...


But as usual, exactly what regulation(s) would you like to see added that would have prevented this law abiding citizen from legally purchasing her hand gun?

:leostare:

Edit: keeping in mind CA already has a wait period and requires gun owners to obtain a government-issued firearm-safety certificate, and subjects concealed-carry-permit applicants to a “good cause” standard.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,422
Reputation
5,272
Daps
115,931
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Funny how the NRA hasn't been mentioned, or alt-right, or Republicans, or Trump this, or Russia that.....


Apparently the shooter doesn't match those descriptions being a light complexioned Persian Iranian, vegan, liberal, animal rights activist, upset about censorship....

:mjlol:

How about we just agree idiots are gone do idiotic things, but not get ideologically emotional to the point that we undermine our rights......:jbhmm:
 
Last edited:
Top