Well....I think the moment it becomes evident that she's engaging in Freudian pseudo-analysis is the moment I question her credibility, regardless of whether or not she's also incorporating other thinkers.
The problem with Welsing is that to her, black masculinity is the PRIMARY target of white supremacy. Everything revolves around masculinity, it is the end all be all for her. I don't deny for a second that masculinity isn't a target of white supremacy. You see this with other races too, where Asian men are portrayed as either feminine or asexual, as a contrast to the masculine Occident. Again, Welsing's writing centralizes black masculinity. This to me is the wrong approach. Oppression is operating on many different levels on many different ways. Centralizing it like this dismisses anything that falls outside of her model, which is supposed to be predictable and easy to understand.
That she couches her pseudo-theories in an understanding of African-American history makes it (understandably) extremely attractive to some people. There's a very good reading of Welsing by Essex Hemphill where he states that "[h]er theory is very seductive, particularly for Black people oppressed for so long. It is very much like cocaine; a dose of her ideas momentarily provides one with a rush of empowerment, but after the high is gone the harsh realities of racism still remain, just as sexual diversity, as created by nature, still remains irrevocable, uncontrollable." (The Columbia Reader on Lesbians and Gay Men in Media, Society, and Politics - Google Books)
I'm going to go watch her speak tonight at the museum..

so I'll see if she hits her points the way you're claiming... maybe she's evolved----and expanded on her ideas about oppression..

and homosexuality indeed is created by nature... So are birth defects and disorders. Do you believe homosexuality is a disorder? Considering the fact that it's counter-evolutionary.... can it be considered 'normal'?
Why are you trying to come at me for? Do you need me to explain some things to you?