Injecting subjective emotional nonsense to make it appear as if you have valid pragmatic counterpoints to an ostensibly pragmatic debate? You are fukking horrible at this, no wonder you're WOAT, talkin sum "b b b but patriotism" in a pragmatic fukking debate.
Borders exist for a reason.
Riddle me this you fukking hypocrite,
There is no such thing as hypocrisy to the powerful on the world stage.
would YOU start a petition to Whitehouse.gov to pressure Israel to pursue disarmament and non proliferation with a threat of harsh economic sanctions if the Iranians were to able to get their Arab allies along with themselves to agree to full transparency with a neutral overseer like the IAEA and aggressive non proliferation based on the Israelis agreeing to do the same?
1. Israel would have to admit to having nukes
2. I don't take disarmament seriously. Its double-speak...and again, you can't put that genie back in the bottle. Especially when you're not an ex-soviet state under a centralized command like the Arab world...isn't.
And Iranians don't see themselves as Arabs
You gotta UNDERSTAND the world first, little boy
3. The Arab states lie and have lied about their WMD pursuits. You might be too young to remember this but the reason the Iraq lie worked so well was that Iraq WAS pursuing nuclear technology. Saddam bragged about it.
Since you just don't want anyone to have nukes period, and the Israelis refuse to sign non prolif. treaties in the past, present, and apparently forseeable future, right?
can't sign a non-proliferative treaty when you HAVE nukes
WTF are you saying right now?
Get them


's ready for YET ANOTHER reversal of your position, you 5th Grade science lab teacher's assistant.
You're the grown man believing in a white god and shyt.
fukk outta my face with this pacificist bullshyt.
Go cape for a banana republic
