even though alice calls her actions and beliefs feminism, what she did to her daughter is straight up abuse and has nothing to do with feminism. the basic definition of feminism is economic, political, and social equality between the sexes. what she did to her daughter is not feminism nor is it a result of feminism. she did it because she is a POS and then tried to flip her silliness into "i am doing this because i am a feminist". no she did it because she is crazy AF . if she had that much hatred towards being a mom she should have let her daughter live with another family member.
How is she trying to flip anything into anything if her daughter emphasized feminism in her own article from her own experiences?
She did that for a reason. Are you denying a person's experiences with toxic behavior because you agree with the ideology? An ideology that mutates and redefines itself every few years?
You do know Alice Walker is a PIONEER of said ideology, correct?
Why aren't we examining the connections between her behavior, the way her daughter said she justified it, and her concrete status as the inventor of the term Womanism..and womanism's influence upon the modern iteration of feminism?
These are not reaches, they're simple requests for dialogue.
I noticed your post repeats a point that I've already considered and responded do. What's good with that...sir?