The white nationalist rejection of 'freedom of association' alone makes it incompatible.Not sure that is true. A more libertarian system would see the majority of whites refusing to conduct business with blacks, at least openly. Since there would be no federal intercession to enforce a basic equality amongst those conducting business with one another, would be a reset to pre Brown v Education America essentially. I think it's a fallacy to assume that libertarian thought isn't incompatible with white nationalist thought, after all the freedom to do business with whom one pleases, free of coercion, is one of the tenets of libertarianism. Hard to see how that couldn't be stretched into get the fukk out of my store ******. One more thing, isn't a strong state the only thing that has been the protector of black rights in this country? A laissez-faire style of government basically puts us at the mercy of over 50 state governments, further sub divided into tens of thousands of local governments. It would be the post Reconstruction Era all over again. I don't object to your original posting, I actually agree that these ideas must be heard so that we can better counter and destroy them. Shunning shyt that we don't want to hear or find objectionable doesn't make it go away.
White nationalist desire a white state forcibly maintained... in your own description of the contrast you point out the issue with this.
I'm actually pleased with the discussion it created tho
@ The arrogance.


if for nothing else, 


