**I'll take 'What's in a dictionary' for $200, Alex**
inb4
Linking me to a term in the dictionary without providing any context or argument is the intellectual equivalent of picking up your marbles and going home.
American Drone Strike Policy Discussion
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
Linking me to a term in the dictionary without providing any context or argument is the intellectual equivalent of picking up your marbles and going home.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,015
- Daps
- 122,436
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
MyGawdThePower said:Linking me to a term in the dictionary without providing any context or argument is the intellectual equivalent of picking up your marbles and going home.
Read OP's second post in this thread again.
intilectual recipricol
Killin fake hip hop
Linking me to a term in the dictionary without providing any context or argument is the intellectual equivalent of picking up your marbles and going home.
Basically.
Dude had faith that he could refute anything, then read, decided he couldnt refute and instead posted a definition of exactly how christians read the bible, then tried to wave his hands and play with definitions to distract us from the fact that be couldnt refute anything. And I havent even gotten into the serious shyt yet because son and people like him have proven time and time again that they cant understand simple shyt.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,015
- Daps
- 122,436
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
intilectual recipricol said:
Well, if 'G-d' is so simple, please define it coherently. Primary attributes only.
intilectual recipricol
Killin fake hip hop
there is no god. This is already established through my atheism. But I can address the mythical god models presented in your preferred storybook or god models presented by believers. Furthermore you all refute each other.
We are winding down Afghanistan and I don't think many people would say that being there is unethical. The guy just put in charge in Afghanistan is there solely to bring us out.
Yemen and Libya, I can agree with. But I asked because the Somali government wants the US' help and I think that makes it interesting.
Madvillain
Pro
But but but liberals only mimic what Maddow tells them to
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,015
- Daps
- 122,436
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
intilectual recipricol said:
This statement makes no sense since 'G-d' is meaningless.
You believe it means something. I don't.
Y'all have fun.
You believe it means something. I don't.
Y'all have fun.
WOW. This has to be one of the STUPIDIST defence of the use of drones I have ever seen. Its blatant hypocrisy from STUPID, DENSE liberals like this whore Krystal ball that epitomizes why I can't stand liberals or MSNBC for that matter. Its truly sickening and disgusting what passes for journalism in this pathetic country these days....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0CBvqHnhio
fukk this bytch, The Obama Admin, and any other idiot who shares a similar viewpoint!
Okay breh take it easy. I understand your frustration but then don't generalize all liberals. Yes I saw that statement by her last week and to be blunt I was fukking embarrassed.
But like i said i understand your frustration but don't generalize liberals. I mean even Al Sharpton of all people criticized Obama and said he was critical of the drone policy under Bush so its only fair to be critical of it under OBama.
Ed from the Ed Show also criticized him more than Once, Rachel Maddow has brought up drones probably more than all of them and went further with the statistics.
As said before, clowns like Krystal Ball and Toure to my knowledge are the very few on MSNBC that try to find a way around defending this. To my knowledge basically everyone else has condemmned it. Take my word for it its not something I am making up.
Just because you hear other people talking abotu MSNBC not doing it breh, doesn't mean its true. Its speaking about daily/weekly.
I think even Martin Bashir has criticized this
I understand your point breh, just understand that despite my affiliation I am not gonna defend Toure or Krystal Ball; Their statements on drones(Toure defended it by saying "Obama is the commander in chief" on twitter
) are absolutely embarrassing
intilectual recipricol
Killin fake hip hop
Lmao... You couldve avoided this embarrassment by not saying you were going to refute anything. If god meant nothing to you then you wouldnt have responded.
very fail
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,015
- Daps
- 122,436
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
intilectual recipricol said:
'G-d' means something to you, which I find odd.
Anyhow, first post: Reminds me of an episode of Morel Oral.
Second post: Eisegesis isn't appropriate for interpretation.
Third post: Using Genesis doesn't work if you know what it is: http://www.the-coli.com/1750987-post19.html Also, eisegesis.
That's all.
Brown_Pride
All Star
who's this "we" you got a mouse in your pocket? You make mistakes, I make post-posting-corrections...sometimes numerous times
Drones - a more efficient way to kill people.
That's all they are. People want to discuss the ethics of killing other people? How can people not see the illogical conclusions this will lead to?
War is not ethical, it's brutal, it's horrible and the first victim of war is always conscience and ethics. The irony is that rather than send a cruse missile to destroy an entire block, we use drones in a most "humane" fashion to limit casualties...on both sides. We could always invade like we did in Iraq.
Domestic drones on the other hand or straight up just illegal per our laws. Talk about privacy issues. Scarier still is that satellite that can record real time video of like...everything. Just wait till the start strapping ear orbit cannons and guided bombs from that piece...
Type Username Here
Not a new member
This is not different than what about 10 or so posters have said on here.
"I trust Obama more than Bush, so it's okay if he breaks the law"
"I trust Obama more than Bush, so it's okay if he breaks the law"
WOW. This has to be one of the STUPIDIST defence of the use of drones I have ever seen. Its blatant hypocrisy from STUPID, DENSE liberals like this whore Krystal ball that epitomizes why I can't stand liberals or MSNBC for that matter. Its truly sickening and disgusting what passes for journalism in this pathetic country these days....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0CBvqHnhio
fukk this bytch, The Obama Admin, and any other idiot who shares a similar viewpoint!
this c00n is
This dude @Type Username Here has some reading comprehension problems.
Last edited by a moderator: