At this point in their respective careers, Green is better than Andre Johnson. Anyone who disagrees needs to slam their head in their car door because it's so fukking obviously true.
Foster is obviously >>>> Green-Ellis.
So who does that leave?
Kevin Walter v. Brandon Tate and Jermaine Gresham v. Owen Daniels.
I think Tate is > Walter. Younger, more athletic, less injury prone, and more of a downfield threat.
I'd also give Gresham the edge over Daniels for similar reasons.
So yes, when you talk about it position for position, Dalton does have better weapons. The problem is that the combination of Johnson/Foster is better than the combination of Green/every other player in the Bengals offense. Foster provides something that the Bengals, despite their slightly better depth at WR2 and TE, can't match -- a running back that can carry a team all by himself.
Because of the relative importance of the RB position alone, I'd give Schaub a slight edge.
Foster is obviously >>>> Green-Ellis.
So who does that leave?
Kevin Walter v. Brandon Tate and Jermaine Gresham v. Owen Daniels.
I think Tate is > Walter. Younger, more athletic, less injury prone, and more of a downfield threat.
I'd also give Gresham the edge over Daniels for similar reasons.
So yes, when you talk about it position for position, Dalton does have better weapons. The problem is that the combination of Johnson/Foster is better than the combination of Green/every other player in the Bengals offense. Foster provides something that the Bengals, despite their slightly better depth at WR2 and TE, can't match -- a running back that can carry a team all by himself.
Because of the relative importance of the RB position alone, I'd give Schaub a slight edge.

silly nikkaz
