Another brother from the manosphere taking L to racist destiny smh

[Wild self]

Reminds me of this

True, some dudes are smoking that dust if they want an IG thottie.

 

[Gloxina]

Idk, the username just sounded like something a pr girl would make

My bad sis

Fantasizing about Latinas while talking to a Black woman about this topic.

 

[RareHunter]

Fantasizing about Latinas while talking to a Black woman about this topic.

U know me . Neva dat.

 

[High Art]

Judging from this thread:


Black men just need to stop talking completely, no more podcasts, youtube channels or relationship panels just cease all activity and move on. All this shyt is a waste of time tbh

There was a point where a lot of men did that. And all we got were women whining about why they couldn't find a man and making shyt up. There's a thread that highlights a news article that was wondering why it seems black men are largely absent from discussions concerning these kinds of issues.

I get where you're coming from but it's very telling about the people involved in all of this: They don't want a solution to the problem of not being able to find a man or dealing with the "black manosphere" and all that, they just want a monopoly on who to blame without any pushback.

Has anyone in the thread actually refuted blue hair's points or has it only been ad hominems and generic "He's wrong" type statements?

By that logic, we should be allowed to post all kinds of stats about things unsavory and might as well allow 4cac posters in. This is what gets me. A chance to attack black men has people ready to let 4cac in. This is the same logic they use to justify their existence in many places. The other issue I have is that a lot of people don't have the knowledge or maturity to use stats properly. I called out BlackEmpressPearl or whatever her name is on that and she threw a hissy fit.

But by all means, list his arguments and we can knock them down.

 

[Wild self]

Fantasizing about Latinas while talking to a Black woman about this topic.

LOL

You would be considered a borderline "pick me" for simply not being a blind follower of the feminist Twitter babble.

 

[African Peasant]

Im not a fan of these manosphere idiots, but Destiny is not really debating here.

Its mouth piece hustling.

talk succinctly, with speed and diction and allows you to give what ever you are saying an air of authority or correctness.


also moronic manosphere talking points doint take much to refute.


These negroes are embarassing. I with they would stfu and spend more time better their own life than on this podcast bullshyt

He knows who to play these dumb games with.

Put him against Umar or Charleston White...

 

[Wild self]

There was a point where a lot of men did that. And all we got were women whining about why they couldn't find a man and making shyt up. There's a thread that highlights a news article that was wondering why it seems black men are largely absent from discussions concerning these kinds of issues.

I get where you're coming from but it's very telling about the people involved in all of this: They don't want a solution to the problem of not being able to find a man or dealing with the "black manosphere" and all that, they just want a monopoly on who to blame without any pushback.



By that logic, we should be allowed to post all kinds of stats about things unsavory and might as well allow 4cac posters in. This is what gets me. A chance to attack black men has people ready to let 4cac in. This is the same logic they use to justify their existence in many places. The other issue I have is that a lot of people don't have the knowledge or maturity to use stats properly. I called out BlackEmpressPearl or whatever her name is on that and she threw a hissy fit.

But by all means, list his arguments and we can knock them down.

Its because there is $$$$ for black men being weak-willed simps to fund expensive restaurants and money in black male's pain.

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

I agree that doctors don't marry working class people super often, my point is simply that it does happen sometimes. They could meet at Whole Foods lmao. And yes, often (soon-to-be) successful people meet and marry while in grad school. There are also women who go to college with the sole goal of dating/marrying a man in grad school. Long story short there are a lot of ways this happens, but the likeliest end result is successful people marrying successful people. Whether they met in college or not.

This of course flies in the face of the biggest manosphere talking point: men don't care how much a woman makes, or what they do. This is why it was always obvious Kevin Samuels was a fraud to me. Successful men are very focused on what a woman does, which is why they tend to marry successful women the most. For a variety of reasons, some of which we discussed already. Others would include: to avoid gold diggers, to increase their household income (credit, private schools for children, paying for college, kids sports, etc). Think about how important that shyt matters somewhere like...Los Angeles. Or New York. Marrying the right person opens economic doors and is how you build generational wealth. Which is what these men are thinking about.

I totally agree with your last paragraph. Placing greater value on a woman's cooking skills versus her education is kind of a low class way of thinking. A successful marriage conscious educated brother is most likely to be pedigree conscious as well. What neighborhood are we going to live in? Will our kids be able to go to a good school? Will this woman help me raise seeds that can go to a good university? A cookbook ain't got shyt to do with those questions

 

[Left.A1]

A few weeks back he had a 3 on 1 debate with the manosphere dudes (one of them called himself a c00n) about black women being the cause of black peoples problems, and had them in shambles over a simple google search about child custody statistics They spent like 20 minutes talking about the rigged court/welfare system against men, with a stat that 90% of custody is awarded to women being their lynchpin argument, but all it took was a "well actually" google from that cac to have them doing some of the best juelzing of the year so far.


1:32:15



It really is funny how easily they fell apart with simple rebuttals that they aren't prepared for.

The nonchalant nature and connotation behind the way in which you can intellectually disarm these folks is entertaining …but that lets you know that their platform is emotional and not logically sound

 

[Gloxina]

LOL

You would be considered a borderline "pick me" for simply not being a blind follower of the feminist Twitter babble.

Which is why I don’t have issues with men. I’m pretty realistic about this stuff

 

[Matt504]

By that logic, we should be allowed to post all kinds of stats about things unsavory and might as well allow 4cac posters in. This is what gets me.

If that's the case then maybe appeal to the Black men with platforms who keep platforming racists. The cake is already baked by the time we're watching the content because the debates have already taken place.

 

[High Art]

If that's the case then maybe appeal to the Black men with platforms who keep platforming racists. The cake is already baked by the time we're watching the content because the debates have already taken place.

I agree, they shouldn't platform them. And if or when they do, it shouldn't be given attention since that is what they want. However, we can't ignore the black women who do this as well or outright preach about aborting black male babies like divestors do.

 

[Tair]

I totally agree with your last paragraph. Placing greater value on a woman's cooking skills versus her education is kind of a low class way of thinking. A successful marriage conscious educated brother is most likely to be pedigree conscious as well. What neighborhood are we going to live in? Will our kids be able to go to a good school? Will this woman help me raise seeds that can go to a good university? A cookbook ain't got shyt to do with those questions

It's pretty rare for men to have a problem with women having an education. The problem comes in when some women that went to school place greater emphasis on the degree they earned than on substantive qualities. Hence, "does she know how to cook?"

How are you not working in the field you earned your degree in yet using it as a cudgel to knock a person down a peg?

 

[Matt504]

I agree, they shouldn't platform them. And if or when they do, it shouldn't be given attention since that is what they want. However, we can't ignore the black women who do this as well or outright preach about aborting black male babies like divestors do.

what's your plan for not ignoring them, are you producing content that counters what they're saying?

 

[High Art]

what's your plan for not ignoring them, are you producing content that counters what they're saying?

Am I spreading the word as to how dangerous such a group can be and are? Yes.