“He keeps fouling”
“Look at the plus minus”
Proceeds to get gamed by a center who can’t even walk straight and we get okc/pacers.

dude is slow.
Rudy had four subpar games when Hayes was barely playing. That means the Lakers had success limiting Rudy with Hayes not being a factor.
What about that do you not understand?
Why focus on the one good game he had as if Hayes would've made any difference? Did the Lakers lose the series because Rudy had one good game? Hayes can't even defend centers, anyway, so what the fukk are you even trying to argue here? If he keeps fouling, what the fukk would he have done in that game but foul out?
That series was lost before Rudy even decided to show up in the last game.
Do you seriously think the difference between the Lakers winning/losing that series was playing Hayes more?