Do I need to remind you nikkas that y'all haven't even seen the movie yet? 


Currently 53% on RT.
So at this point they need to put aside their cac egos and write Kang in a compelling way because otherwise their future film plans aren't going to work.
Impossibleapparently the mid-credits scene is FIRE and better than the damn movie

the same writer for this is set to write Kang Dynasty![]()
Just give it up man. You Stans can’t ever just admit a movie you haven’t seen is trash can you??nikkas haven't even seen the movie and already complaining![]()

Wrong.
His chain of command, in particular Kareem Daniel was interfering with a drive to create new content. One strategic reason for this was Disney+ and the desire to create content for that.
Daniel was removed as soon as Chapek was gone.
"Disney Dismisses Chapek Deputy Kareem Daniel As Bob Iger Puts “Decision-Making Back In The Hands Of Our Creative Teams”
By JAMIE LANG | 11/22/2022 7:00 am | 2
Kareem Daniel, chairman of Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution under Bob Chapek, has left the company just one day after Disney parted ways with its now-former CEO."
![]()
Disney Dismisses Chapek Deputy Kareem Daniel As Bob Iger Puts "Decision-Making Back In The Hands Of Our Creative Teams”
A key figure in Disney's shift towards data-driven decision-making, Daniel's departure seemed likely after Iger's return.www.cartoonbrew.com
Word on the street was that even Feige (and upwards) were against the Chapek/Daniel strategy.
@winb83 see above. the creatives were not making the decisions as they were under Iger.
), perhaps Feige included, but if Chapek and/or Daniels were directly involved in decision making that turned Phase 4 into Phase Bore it would have been huge news, particularly after they got the boot. Who said that? Chapek and Co. micromanaging not just Feige, but Kennedy (LucasFilms) and Docter (Pixar) in creative is well-documented at this point. That's part of the reason why the majority of folks were pleased at the news of him exiting.
As for Pixar, I mean, those flops they had were heavy on inclusion, diversity and representation. Truth be told a lot of the Disney product in the Chapek/Daniels era leaned heavily into so called "wokeness." Was that the interference people complained about?
Or is it just a coincidence that the representation and diversity push mixed with a period of storytelling malaise? We're about to find out soon enough. 