the only poster to defend you was @bliz and he didnt have evidence while everyone else said you were wrong.
Do you even know what evidence is? I stated my recollection of people criticizing the cavs for trading bennett. Where is the overwhelming evidence to the contrary?
Are you actually saying, "I didn't like your evidence" ???
Because that's not the same thing as "overwhelming evidence" to the contrary. What affirmative evidence was provided to rebut my statement?
Let me try to teach you something. When a plaintiff makes a legal charge, a complaint, against a defendant, the defendant has several options as to defense. First, the defendant can assert that there's no evidence to support plaintiff's allegations. This would result in summary judgment or adjudication. Second, the defendant can assert affirmative defenses for which he carries the burden of proof. Third, the defendant can factually counter the allegations made by plaintiff. Nobody factually countered my charge (#3). They stated there was no evidence for my charge (#1) which is untrue because my recollection is my evidence sufficient to make it a triable issue of fact.