Did you watch those games closely? They didn't score that on Curry and he didn't allow a single matchup to drop 40. That's massive hyperbole. Him guarding WB wasn't the reason OKC went on a 9-0 run, I don't know what you're even talking about there and one of his fouls were picked up swiping the ball against Durant.
I won't admit that because I think he is a good defender. People ITT are making the mistake of thinking Lillard, Lowry, Wall's point totals are because of him when they scored a huge portion of their points on other defenders. Like Lillard dropped 20 in the 4th when Curry wasn't even in the damn game yet didn't hit a single FG when guarded by him in the 2nd (was able to draw a 3rd foul on him though)
When I come across a post that I disagree with, I'll respond to it. It's that simple. Just so happens that the Warriors have just been the most discussed team in the league past two seasons so there's a lot of opportunities for me to talk about them especially on this board where ya'll go to crazy extremes.
I said Dray would guard Kareem fine with help from the Warriors team defense. Under today's rules, it's a lot easier to contain post up big men than it was back then. The actual point was that he'd make up for any adv Cap had in the post by exploiting him in the P&R and transition which you weren't accounting for at all.
It wasn't a few possessions, Curry spent significant time on Westbrook especially in the 3rd Q and would've remained on him in the 1st had he not picked up a 2nd foul on Durant. WB didnt bully anyone that game
You guys began the comeback in the 3rd Q and he guarded WB then. Klay did get the assignment for the large majority of the 4th though
My point here is that the notion of "Curry doesn't guard elite PG's" just isn't true, he does. The Warriors don't need to hide him anymore than the Clips do Paul
Go ahead and point out what's wrong with that post.