anyone else think we NEVER went to the moon

[MikelArteta]

nikkas fighting over the moon landing lol


considering the landing happened under nixon a liar

The Passionate Eye - Dark Side of the Moon - YouTube!

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

There is some fukkery afoot imo. We could barely land a rover on Mars, it had like a 60% chance to fail. I'm not sold either way but I like to think Stanley Kubrick faked it all because its fascinating.

 

[Roberto Dinero]

You think a gust of wind is just goin to blow dem shyts away in space breh?

How do u know there is no wind on the moon? Well, maybe not wind but some other kind of force that would have eroded those f*cking foot prints.

I don't believe for a second that those prints are still gonna be there after 50 years or more.

Because there is no air or wind on the moon to erode the prints.

Was that a serious question you asked?

Yeah I'm dead serious. There can easily be other kinds of erosion up there. Its bullsh!t if u ask me.

And if they landed in the moon back then, why don't they still go back on a regular basis? I am sure there is a lot more they could add to their research if they kept going. The whole story is bullsh!t if u ask me.

 

[Malta]

How do u know there is no wind on the moon? Well, maybe not wind but some other kind of force that would have eroded those f*cking foot prints.

I don't believe for a second that those prints are still gonna be there after 50 years or more.



Yeah I'm dead serious. There can easily be other kinds of erosion up there. Its bullsh!t if u ask me.

And if they landed in the moon back then, why don't they still go back on a regular basis? I am sure there is a lot more they could add to their research if they kept going. The whole story is bullsh!t if u ask me.

Yet, some of those craters you see are hundreds of millions of years old.

 

[Roberto Dinero]

Yet, some of those craters you see are hundreds of millions of years old.

Craters and foot prints are not the same my friend. We are talking about f*cking foot prints here! U serious? U don't think that's not very believable?

But whatever. I'm just telling you the way I see it.

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

How do u know there is no wind on the moon? Well, maybe not wind but some other kind of force that would have eroded those f*cking foot prints.

I don't believe for a second that those prints are still gonna be there after 50 years or more.



Yeah I'm dead serious. There can easily be other kinds of erosion up there. Its bullsh!t if u ask me.

And if they landed in the moon back then, why don't they still go back on a regular basis? I am sure there is a lot more they could add to their research if they kept going. The whole story is bullsh!t if u ask me.

U serious wit dis shyt fam?

 

[Insensitive]

How do u know there is no wind on the moon? Well, maybe not wind but some other kind of force that would have eroded those f*cking foot prints.

I don't believe for a second that those prints are still gonna be there after 50 years or more.



Yeah I'm dead serious. There can easily be other kinds of erosion up there. Its bullsh!t if u ask me.

And if they landed in the moon back then, why don't they still go back on a regular basis? I am sure there is a lot more they could add to their research if they kept going. The whole story is bullsh!t if u ask me.

Damn.
This is why EVERYDAY I wake up and am thankful I went to a decent school in America, cause clearly some of y'all were failed with your public education.

Craters and foot prints are not the same my friend. We are talking about f*cking foot prints here! U serious? U don't think that's not very believable?

But whatever. I'm just telling you the way I see it.

The way you see it is FACTUALLY wrong.

 

[The_Sheff]

Craters and foot prints are not the same my friend. We are talking about f*cking foot prints here! U serious? U don't think that's not very believable?

But whatever. I'm just telling you the way I see it.

And only you because i refuse to believe whatever education system you were a part of did not teach you basic shyt like this.

Im not trying to be funny but do you understand the concept of friction and what causes erosion?

 

[Roberto Dinero]

I went to high school, graduated, I did alright. I don't think I'm uneducated at all.

I just don't believe the sh!t. And I never really studied space or anything like that so maybe I'm wrong.

Explain to me how some footprints are still there after all this time and why Nasa doasen't go back to the moon on a regular basis to compile more research?

 

[Malta]

Craters and foot prints are not the same my friend. We are talking about f*cking foot prints here! U serious? U don't think that's not very believable?

But whatever. I'm just telling you the way I see it.

No atmosphere
No active volcanos
No plate tectonics

How the hell is anything supposed to erode? The Earth has had just as many if not more impacts from meteors and asteroids as the moon, where are all the craters on Earth.

 

[Roberto Dinero]

And only you because i refuse to believe whatever education system you were a part of did not teach you basic shyt like this.

Im not trying to be funny but do you understand the concept of friction and what causes erosion?

Well, erosion is caused by wind, water, etc far as I know. There might not be any of that on the moon but I'm saying there could be other forms of erosion we don't know about up there.

No atmosphere
No active volcanos
No plate tectonics

How the hell is anything supposed to erode? The Earth has had just as many if not more impacts from meteors and asteroids as the moon, where are all the craters on Earth.

Ok. When was the last time Earth has been hit by a meteor or an asteroid then? Also I think a meteor or asteroid would have a lot more impact on the surface than some f*cking footprints.

 

[Malta]

I went to high school, graduated, I did alright. I don't think I'm uneducated at all.

I just don't believe the sh!t. And I never really studied space or anything like that so maybe I'm wrong.

Explain to me how some footprints are still there after all this time and why Nasa doasen't go back to the moon on a regular basis to compile more research?

Again, why didn't the Soviets say the US didn't land on the moon?


Also, here's terrain remapped by a Japanse probe in 2008 -

You gonna tell me they had the tech in 1969 to create a perfect replica of the moons surface, and 39 years later have it match up with 3-D imaging done by a 3rd party The real pics, match up with the 3-D remapping.

 

[The_Sheff]

I went to high school, graduated, I did alright. I don't think I'm uneducated at all.

I just don't believe the sh!t. And I never really studied space or anything like that so maybe I'm wrong.

Explain to me how some footprints are still there after all this time and why Nasa doasen't go back to the moon on a regular basis to compile more research?

The moon is a big dead rock. The only thing of use we could do there is place a telescope since there is no atmosphere to distort the image. We do just as well just placing the telescope in space.

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

Well, erosion is caused by wind, water, etc far as I know. There might not be any of that on the moon but I'm saying there could be other forms of erosion we don't know about up there.




Ok. When was the last time Earth has been hit by a meteor or an asteroid then?

 

[Sad Bunny]

Roberto Dinero is one dumb nikka