Even those upskirts?The law is very clear that when you're out in public, anyone can photograph you without permission.
![]()
Even those upskirts?The law is very clear that when you're out in public, anyone can photograph you without permission.
![]()

To my knowledge, those are legal as well, but there are States that are pushing laws to ban it.Even those upskirts?![]()
The back of the shirt is concaveA wide flat ass is furor worthy? Folks love getting worked into a tizzy.


Suppose he just took a picture of a man sitting on a bench. Literally nobody would have a problem with it.
But because it's a girl's ass (which, by the way, he was complimenting) it's a problem that needs permission?
I can grant you that it's a matter of taste, but the problem is that it becomes too subjective.
Either we grant that courtesy to everyone or no one. And the fact that no would would question a photo of a man on a bench, means I throw out any consideration at having to ask for permission to take a picture of a girl's ass.
![]()
Just like a cac to joke about a fat ass rather than approach it


It has to be one or the other because photography by nature lends itself to A LOT of photos of the public.Why must it be one or the other? There has to be a middle ground.... While this photo might be entertaining (one of the reasons why a man on a bench wouldn't be posted) it is also tacky to exploit the situation...
I have no sympathy because she went in public looking like that... But it is still tasteless in Bubles part