April 5th Wisconsin Primary - If Bernie loses it's time to Pack it in

blotter

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,035
Reputation
870
Daps
11,290
They did in 2008.


If they hadn't then Martin O'Malley would be facing off with Romney because Hillary would have served her 8 by now.
Hillary often references her popular vote lead and winning it in 2008. It is disingenuous because she has been and was in 2008 handily beaten in the caucus states that only have a few thousand "votes" when it's all said and done

it's the type of statement while technically true, it points to one of her major flaws, which is not being a genuine person
 

#StarkSet

Stark till I die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
20,187
Reputation
4,934
Daps
40,882
None of this has to do with being "above" board.

Bernie lives in a state no one gives a fukk about, and thus has never had any accountability for his policies or politics.

Obama is AGAINST these campaign finance rules...but he's not gonna lose because of it.

Stop clinging to ideology without nuance.
yea you right lets instead elect one of the most corrupt politicians in the United States
 

blotter

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,035
Reputation
870
Daps
11,290
Exactly. So how do you expect some socialist/progressive wave to sweep across the country once Uncle Bernie gets elected? :stopitslime:

And point me to his tax plan where it DOESNT mention an all out increase.

Btw, Mr. Antiwar had no problem bringing Lockheed into his state. And he's defending gun companies too. Looks like your savior is full of shyt just like the rest of em.
a single payer system doesn't require a progressive wave. 60% of americans already support it. Either you have a fully public system where people are dying in the streets or a single pool. It's funny we're the only ones who haven't figured this out

a tax on wall st speculation is easy enough to pitch and doesn't hurt farmer Joe

this shyt isn't really that hard. he's voted against almost every use of force and isn't near the hawk that Hillary is. He's the better option
 

MrSinnister

Delete account when possible.
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Messages
5,323
Reputation
325
Daps
6,832

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
41,990
Reputation
1,691
Daps
39,934
Reppin
NULL
Hillary often references her popular vote lead and winning it in 2008. It is disingenuous because she has been and was in 2008 handily beaten in the caucus states that only have a few thousand "votes" when it's all said and done

it's the type of statement while technically true, it points to one of her major flaws, which is not being a genuine person
True, but you cant deny Obama was a huge risk back then. It worked out though.
~~~~~~~~~

As for the repubs, ted is a fool. We'll see if he's laughing when Jeb! steals it from him at the convention. And then in 2019 when Jeb's! son primary his ass out of the Texas senate.
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
41,990
Reputation
1,691
Daps
39,934
Reppin
NULL

blotter

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,035
Reputation
870
Daps
11,290
What do you mean? Obama had the delegate count.

Election Center 2008: Delegate Scorecard - Elections & Politics news from CNN.com

Trying to pretend we're Aussie neophytes over here with an Obama and then Black fetish :mjlol:. I was there then. Obama had I'm overtaken her for a while.
it's Hillary playing fast and loose with the truth. She is getting crushed in the caucus states and got beat pretty good in 08. They don't get represented in the vote totals. So she talks about winning the "popular" vote by X amount. She can't help herself
 

kingofnyc

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,442
Reputation
1,615
Daps
58,445
Reppin
Boogie Down BX
It doesnt matter what some talking head on CNN said :martin: no superdelegate is "commited" till the national convention in july and the supers have historically always went with the candidate who leads in pledged delegates.
actually it's funny you say that because he also added that he spoke to a person who has a superdelegate in the state that Bernie won over 70% and that person told him it dosnt matter their superdelegates is staying with Hillary


CNN has really pissed me off these last few months man. Anything anti Bernie gets pushed to the forefront so quick. I need that Al Jazeera in my life.
they just had on Bernie new campaign manager


So they would go against the will of their voters?
:what: against what :what: currently she has a 2.5 million more votes


Im not a Bernie Bro but I see why some would pay for this bytch Paula Begala to get offed..dude is such an annoying little prick fakkit:francis:
:yeshrug: dude is funny to me


what do you expect when bernie hasn't raised a dime for the DNC but hillary has raised millions and millions of dollars for other democrats?

it's a 'scratch my back, i'll scratch yours' political world. :manny:
:salute:
excellent point
that's what these Bernie stans don't understand Hillary been doing this for over 4 decades while Bernie is an independent running as a Democrat
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,001
Reputation
5,412
Daps
72,654
actually it's funny you say that because he also added that he spoke to a person who has a superdelegate in the state that Bernie won over 70% and that person told him it dosnt matter their superdelegates is staying with Hillary



they just had on Bernie new campaign manager



:what: against what :what: currently she has a 2.5 million more votes



:yeshrug: dude is funny to me



:salute:
excellent point
that's what these Bernie stans don't understand Hillary been doing this for over 4 decades while Bernie is an independent running as a Democrat
@dtownreppin214 my latest thread answers your superdelegate issue. I just posted it. Aside from that, I hate this election. I am watching people who are intelligent (whether they support Sanders or HRC) cosign stupid shyt. This king dude has a sophomoric understanding of politics and is a Clinton mouthpiece, He literally does not know how to argue anything that is not a Clinton talking point and has no business acting like he "understands" anything more than almost any Sanders supporter on here. 99% of Higher Learning regulars are supporting Sanders, so now he suddenly knows more than people he's been quietly dapping for years while adding nothing to the discussion :deadrose:.
 
Top