Isaiah Bradley
Banned
A discussion in another thread pushed me to reread this thread and noticed the most popular argument from both-side deniers are specific policies/bills being "championed" for. While accepting that all politicians take money and is more likely swayed by it, which is the root of all healthcare/insurance/gun/wealth gap/greed/tax problems, thus why both parties are the same
The only way a politician proves their commitment is
1) vote result
2) amount of political capital willing to spend
3) what's done with leverage
-A politician having press conferences/tweeting opinions doesn't mean they're supportive of your interest, maybe just pandering
-A politician getting bills submitted into/passed a committee doesn't mean they're supportive of your interest, a common fund raising talking point is the amount of bills a politician sponsored/submitted into committees to show they "getting shyt done" and it's because of "someone/something else" why it's being stopped
Rubio and Warren both take money from wall street/corporations/banks and blindly support Israel, but they different because he's for fracking and she's not? stop. Fracking isn't the root of society's problem
The only way a politician proves their commitment is
1) vote result
2) amount of political capital willing to spend
3) what's done with leverage
-A politician having press conferences/tweeting opinions doesn't mean they're supportive of your interest, maybe just pandering
-A politician getting bills submitted into/passed a committee doesn't mean they're supportive of your interest, a common fund raising talking point is the amount of bills a politician sponsored/submitted into committees to show they "getting shyt done" and it's because of "someone/something else" why it's being stopped
Legalize weed argument
Politician A for weed, Politician B not
Both politicians can take money directly/indirectly from tobacco and support their interest, while catering/pandering to their respective base
It's not the public stance, but the work/result done in the chambers that determines their commitment. Submitting bills knowing/hoping that it's going to get killed on delivery is career politician tactics 101
Politician A for weed, Politician B not
Both politicians can take money directly/indirectly from tobacco and support their interest, while catering/pandering to their respective base
It's not the public stance, but the work/result done in the chambers that determines their commitment. Submitting bills knowing/hoping that it's going to get killed on delivery is career politician tactics 101
Rubio and Warren both take money from wall street/corporations/banks and blindly support Israel, but they different because he's for fracking and she's not? stop. Fracking isn't the root of society's problem

that's the exact playbook