Better is better
Unless you're referring to the costs of a graphics card or some broke boy shyt like that.
Are gamers annoyed that they are being forced to buy (potentially) crappy games?
- Thread starter PS5 Pro
- Start date
Unless you're referring to the costs of a graphics card or some broke boy shyt like that.
KevCo
Bond's gun spoke once....
Breh...just start a blog for these stupid ass rants....why people care what other people spend money on?
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,380
- Reputation
- -10,601
- Daps
- 22,223
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
Pretty much. Its like saying is 800p the same as 792p? Yeahyou say this but then say 792p and 1080p are the same
So then, when does it become "different" to the human eye? Depends on some factors
3 of them to be exact.
One, how far away from your TV are you sitting? If you sitting close, hopefully you have a smaller Tv cuz its not good for your eyes to sit really close to a big ass TV. Arcades don't have 80in displays for a reason
So then, you must be sitting a good distance from a TV if its big. You still think the resolution will factor if you sitting at a regular distance?
Of course not. But since this is a console war, and nikkaz is starving. I guess you wanna act like what I just said doesn't apply
The 3rd thing, and probably the most important of all? Take it from here Meach...
You definitely can't see the differnce seeing how you still don't have next gen hardware
Look bruh, now you talking about textures like if Both games don't look identical.Why are you still writing essays, doofy nikka?
I just ignored that for your sake because I thought we could leave it alone and you'd be able to save face. I mean, you're posting articles about the game from FORBES(lol who goes to forbes for a graphical analysis?) from before the game even released.
You really think that the textures on the PC version aren't better?
http://gamingbolt.com/titanfall-visual-analysis-xbox-one-vs-pc - WRONG
You don't think the AA is better? I've played the Xbox One version. Are you telling me that there is no fukking screen tearing?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-titanfall-next-gen-face-off - WRONG
nikka, I was trying to HELP YOU OUT by ignoring that dumb shyt. What the fukk is your problem? Is Digital Foundry just straight up lying? There are differences outside of the resolution doofy nikka. fukk outta here
I don't have to even click on your link. WE done this, we do this everyday.
You are not intelligent enough to understand what you post links too. Your a moron when it comes to this stuff
First its graphics, now you yappin about which system has better AA
No matter what angle you come up with, the games look identical, play exactly the same.
You wanna front like if you playing this different game, or that it looks spectacular on PC compared to XB1?
Really bruh
Ok
As I said unless you have some very expensive/powerful hardware the Xbox one version holds up very well.Better is better
Unless you're referring to the costs of a graphics card or some broke boy shyt like that.
the platform with the most games seems to be relevant in a discussion about a lack of (good) gamesPC gamers always gotta show us like the uninvited dinner guest ?
We're talking about the maximum graphical ability of the game, not the price of the hardware, friend. The game is best on PC.
This dude comes in here talking about the PS4 when his system's best "exclusive" isn't even best on the Xbox One. At least Infamous doesn't get better performance elsewhere
When making these comparisons you can't ignore the price of the hardware friend. PC's are infinitely scaleable consoles are not, but you already knew that. Your just in here taking an opportunity to get your Stan on.
Carry on then
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,380
- Reputation
- -10,601
- Daps
- 22,223
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
Bruh, nobody asked you to be here
And this thread is busy compared to every other thread in this section, which is good for bitness HERE
Be furious about it, cry if you want to. I won't cry about you crying cuz I drink the tears of my haters
I would. You was under the impression the PC version was Vastly superior than the XB1 versionFixed. If you're wrong say you're wrong, nikka. If you had a daddy growin up you would know that. Don't be ashamed.
Meach told you how the XB1 is on INSANE settings, you didn't wanna believe him
Then you find out its true... did you man up, or are you still acting like a bytch?
Maybe your father was a bytch.. apples don't fall far from treez n shyt
After getting shut down, you tried to revert to talking about how PC has better AA, like if that somehow saves you from being a moron in this thread.
You have been outwitted bruh, go enjoy your few extra P
Bruh, I'm sure cellphones can say they have the "most" games but of course thats mostly bullshytthe platform with the most games seems to be relevant in a discussion about a lack of (good) games
Ditto with PC
Not really. Everyone needs a computer. My Macbook died last year and I was going to pay 2000 to get a new Macbook Pro. Instead I built a computer of high quality that'll max out anything I throw at it and last for a long time. I needed a computer. Everybody needs a computer. I mean, if you want to be like that, I guess we can count the money that I spent on my processor and graphics card.When making these comparisons you can't ignore the price of the hardware friend. PC's are infinitely scaleable consoles are not, but you already knew that. Your just in here taking an opportunity to get your Stan on.
Carry on then
But that's still less than the cost of a Xbox One 
Bruh, you couldn't outwit a ham sandwich.
I admit I was wrong about the settings, and props to @MeachTheMonster . Don't try to latch onto that nikka's victories.
But I didn't come into even come into the thread saying anything about the settings. I came in talking about the framerate. Am I wrong about the framerate, breh? Its really a stable 60 FPS on the One, breh?
you don't need a particularly powerful GPU to 'max out' Titanfall. you just need a competent GPU with 3+GB of ram. plus the benefits of playing at your native resolution outweigh the benefits of playing with 'insane' textures (vs the next step down) IMO. applying a scaler to high-res textures kinda defeats the purpose (again IMO). but I guess the X1 has an excess of memory but not power, so they do what they can to squeeze the most out
Not really. Everyone needs a computer. My Macbook died last year and I was going to pay 2000 to get a new Macbook Pro. Instead I built a computer of high quality that'll max out anything I throw at it and last for a long time. I needed a computer. Everybody needs a computer. I mean, if you want to be like that, I guess we can count the money that I spent on my processor and graphics card.
But that's still less than the cost of a Xbox One
There nothing wrong with having a computer that can play games at high performace levels. But it is a bit disengeous to compare that performance to hardware that you know is less powerful.
I was able to play it on high at 60fps with my flabbly rig