Are we still pretending the Wiggins trade wasn't a bad move?

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,182
Reputation
3,905
Daps
103,551
I always admitted I didn't like the trade but shyt it's what Bron wanted...It just is what it is :yeshrug:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,901
Reputation
10,032
Daps
239,635
I understand you fell trap into the hype surrounding the draft etc... But a rookie (even if he's the 1st overall pick) isn't doing squat in a championship game... Don't be fooled, Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.

*reads ridiculous comment. Sees rep*
:mjlol:

All I see on here, s a bunch of people using smiley faces to respond, but never really saying anything of substance


And this is from people with the "good reps"

When you say dumb shyt like "Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.", what else do you expect?

When are you going to stop lying @MGM? Or do you just like trollin all the time? :mjpls:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,901
Reputation
10,032
Daps
239,635
I seriously think that in 10 years or so trolling is going to be recognized as a mental disease by the department of health.. You should try and seek help now.. Go let a medical professional know you have a problem that you can't control
Why are you blatantly lying?

:jbhmm:
 

MalikReloaded

All Star
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
2,449
Reputation
160
Daps
10,747
Reppin
The 215
Man.....we been told yall this shyt.....but but Lebron wants to win now, Love gives them the chance to win now, but but but. Yall had no clue Golden State was about to come out of nowhere and dominate. Now yall could use Wiggins. Especially if Kyrie leaves :heh:
 

Made Myself A Boss

#Trolltruck
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
7,555
Reputation
-6,287
Daps
15,436
Reppin
dMv/ JA
Show me where I said the Cavs would have won Game 1 if they had Wiggins. You're clearly making up shyt in your head right about now.

Cavs went to OT in game 1 right?

Jones played 17 mintues in that game right??

You said you would have played Wiggins over Jones right??

So therefore the Cavs woulda won had Wiggins played right??

I dont veiw things literal

The cavs ended regulation game 1 at 98-98

If you think Wiggins is better then Jones then clearly that move over the course of 17 minutes of a game would attribute to +/- of at least one point or more

Meaning you think that wiggins would of pushed the cavs over the hump..


And Wiggins has an overall -2 plus minus for the season.. But yeah he was going to help the Cavs win game 1 of his first NBA finals.. According to @Gil Scott-Heroin


How Sway.. :mjlol:

You dumbass trolling motherfukker...gtfoh :camby:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,901
Reputation
10,032
Daps
239,635
And Wiggins has an overall -2 plus minus for the season.. But yeah he was going to help the Cavs win game 1 of his first NBA finals.. According to @Gil Scott-Heroin


How Sway.. :mjlol:

You dumbass trolling motherfukker...gtfoh :camby:
You lying piece of shyt. This is what you claimed I said -

@Gil Scott-Heroin told me the Cavs woulda won the Championship had he been on the team last year.. So it must be true:manny:[/QUOTE]

Where did I say this? :mjpls:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,901
Reputation
10,032
Daps
239,635
@MGM let me remind you of how this started, and what its essentially about -
I understand you fell trap into the hype surrounding the draft etc... But a rookie (even if he's the 1st overall pick) isn't doing squat in a championship game... Don't be fooled, Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.

*reads ridiculous comment. Sees rep*
:mjlol:

All I see on here, s a bunch of people using smiley faces to respond, but never really saying anything of substance


And this is from people with the "good reps"

When you say dumb shyt like "Wiggins would be the 12 best player for the Cavs right now.. And hes like the 5 or sixth best on a bad team such as the t-wolves.", what else do you expect?

i) This has absolutely nothing to do with Love
ii) This has absolutely nothing to do with who was going to help the Cavs win Game 1

This has to do with posting dumb shyt: stating that Wiggins would be the 12th best player on the Cavs and he's the fifth or sixth best player on the T'Wolves - two things you couldn't be more wrong about. That's all. You've been trying to move the goalposts ever since (even blatantly lying).

Now kill yourself. :camby:
 

Made Myself A Boss

#Trolltruck
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
7,555
Reputation
-6,287
Daps
15,436
Reppin
dMv/ JA
You lying piece of shyt. This is what you claimed I said -

@Gil Scott-Heroin told me the Cavs woulda won the Championship had he been on the team last year.. So it must be true:manny:

Where did I say this? :mjpls:[/QUOTE]

you don't have to say it... Your dumbass analysis is going to get debunked when your debating with me


If the Cavs won that game that they would have been up 3-0. when in the history of the league has a team come back from being down 3-0?

So the end game of your analysis is that wiggins was the key to the cavs winning the championship :russ:

You dont have to say it to say it... i see right through your bulshyt:russ:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,901
Reputation
10,032
Daps
239,635
you don't have to say it... Your dumbass analysis is going to get debunked when your debating with me


If the Cavs won that game that they would have been up 3-0. when in the history of the league has a team come back from being down 3-0?

So the end game of your analysis is that wiggins was the key to the cavs winning the championship :russ:

You dont have to say it to say it... i see right through your bulshyt:russ:
:merchant:

You've got to be one of the dumbest muhfukkas on this board and that's saying something.

You said Wiggins was the fifth/sixth best player on the T'Wolves, I quoted that because it was bullshyt. Wiggins was NOT the fifth/sixth best player in Minnesota last season. It's got NOTHING to do with what Wiggins would've done on the Cavs. Trading Wiggins for Love was the right thing to do. It's your stupid comments of him being the 12th best player on the Cavs and being the 5th/6th best player on the T'Wolves which I had a problem with. Of course the Cavs wouldn't have won the Finals if they had Wiggins, why the fukk would you even bring that up when I never said or insinuated that?

This has to do with your opinion of him being the 12th best player on the Cavs and 5th/6th best player on the T'Wolves - that's all. Nothing else.
 

Made Myself A Boss

#Trolltruck
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
7,555
Reputation
-6,287
Daps
15,436
Reppin
dMv/ JA
@MGM let me remind you of how this started, and what its essentially about -









i) This has absolutely nothing to do with Love
ii) This has absolutely nothing to do with who was going to help the Cavs win Game 1

This has to do with posting dumb shyt: stating that Wiggins would be the 12th best player on the Cavs and he's the fifth or sixth best player on the T'Wolves - two things you couldn't be more wrong about. That's all. You've been trying to move the goalposts ever since (even blatantly lying).

Now kill yourself. :camby:

Already explained that too ...

Cavs played 8 man rotations during the finals...
James Jones being the 8th

So for all intensive purposes the 9th best player is the same as the 12th best player

So if Andrew Wiggins couldn't beat out Jones for playing time in the finals what difference does it make.. 0 minutes is 0 minutes.

Your arguing if 0 minutes is better as the 9th best player or is 0 minutes better as the 12th best player...

Its pointless..and your an annoying troll for even bringing it up
 
Top