Its all in yourUmmmm ok? Is this about his comments about climate change or the fact no one takes Arnold serious?
Its all in your
![]()
Whatever you want to be, can be.
Left office in disgrace, b*stard son looks like him and from all intents and purposes is a good stand up guy.
His proper son is a faq.
Man shyt must hurt
I have a final question, and it will take some imagination.
There are two doors. Behind Door Number One is a completely sealed room, with a regular, gasoline-fueled car. Behind Door Number Two is an identical, completely sealed room, with an electric car. Both engines are running full blast.
I want you to pick a door to open, and enter the room and shut the door behind you. You have to stay in the room you choose for one hour. You cannot turn off the engine. You do not get a gas mask.
I'm guessing you chose the Door Number Two, with the electric car, right? Door number one is a fatal choice - who would ever want to breathe those fumes?
![]()
Say breh, can you chill out with all this logic please?I have a final question, and it will take some imagination.
There are two doors. Behind Door Number One is a completely sealed room, with a regular, gasoline-fueled car. Behind Door Number Two is an identical, completely sealed room, with an electric car. Both engines are running full blast.
I want you to pick a door to open, and enter the room and shut the door behind you. You have to stay in the room you choose for one hour. You cannot turn off the engine. You do not get a gas mask.
I'm guessing you chose the Door Number Two, with the electric car, right? Door number one is a fatal choice - who would ever want to breathe those fumes?
![]()
Hmm I prefer to not to entertain irrational hypotheticals. Obviously killing random humans is a larger cost than benefit for most moral human beings.I believe livestock emits more greenhouse and more potent greenhouse gas (methane has 23x more effect on climate than CO2) than the transportation sector. Should we kill all the cows too? Is it better we kill some of the people too so that the "earth mother" stays safe?
I believe livestock emits more greenhouse and more potent greenhouse gas (methane has 23x more effect on climate than CO2) than the transportation sector. Should we kill all the cows too? Is it better we kill some of the people too so that the "earth mother" stays safe?
Hmm I prefer to not to entertain irrational hypotheticals. Obviously killing random humans is a larger cost than benefit for most moral human beings.
At the moment large pastures and grazing of cows to make food is an at the moment, tolerated cost for food.
Now if we can eventually get technology up to a point where we can manufacture meats in a lab at a reasonable cost, in a short enough amount of time, then society would be foolish not invest in that as an alternative.
You know how natural gas is more efficient, cleaner, and progressively cheaper and so now coal is out of favor and we don't have to worry about massive smog clouds in our city due to coal plants like 19th century London? Perhaps alternative sources of energy can eventually take onthr same role with some benefits in the process.
It's not all or nothing, right now.
Most people really don't have a good defense for being against other forms of energy except being unwilling and unpaid shills for oil companies.