Arnold Schwarzenegger: I don’t give a fukk if we agree about climate change.

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,704
Reputation
9,167
Daps
142,915
Ummmm ok? Is this about his comments about climate change or the fact no one takes Arnold serious?
Its all in your
1a9ddb9bf82716882ee216e09a09fc75a0f669d34059c8ef83500f03ee9bd7cd.jpg


Whatever you want to be, can be.
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
39,641
Reputation
-2,959
Daps
87,800
Left office in disgrace, b*stard son looks like him and from all intents and purposes is a good stand up guy.
His proper son is a faq.

Man shyt must hurt
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
109,185
Reputation
14,206
Daps
312,324
Reppin
NULL
I have a final question, and it will take some imagination.
There are two doors. Behind Door Number One is a completely sealed room, with a regular, gasoline-fueled car. Behind Door Number Two is an identical, completely sealed room, with an electric car. Both engines are running full blast.
I want you to pick a door to open, and enter the room and shut the door behind you. You have to stay in the room you choose for one hour. You cannot turn off the engine. You do not get a gas mask.
I'm guessing you chose the Door Number Two, with the electric car, right? Door number one is a fatal choice - who would ever want to breathe those fumes?

:ehh:
 

Waldo Geraldo Faldo

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,266
Reputation
1,121
Daps
15,025
Reppin
The Cloud
I have a final question, and it will take some imagination.
There are two doors. Behind Door Number One is a completely sealed room, with a regular, gasoline-fueled car. Behind Door Number Two is an identical, completely sealed room, with an electric car. Both engines are running full blast.
I want you to pick a door to open, and enter the room and shut the door behind you. You have to stay in the room you choose for one hour. You cannot turn off the engine. You do not get a gas mask.
I'm guessing you chose the Door Number Two, with the electric car, right? Door number one is a fatal choice - who would ever want to breathe those fumes?

:ehh:

Pretty much....but, but the economy would collapse and jobs would be lost.....:stopitslime:
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
25,110
Reputation
4,201
Daps
82,156
Reppin
NULL
I have a final question, and it will take some imagination.
There are two doors. Behind Door Number One is a completely sealed room, with a regular, gasoline-fueled car. Behind Door Number Two is an identical, completely sealed room, with an electric car. Both engines are running full blast.
I want you to pick a door to open, and enter the room and shut the door behind you. You have to stay in the room you choose for one hour. You cannot turn off the engine. You do not get a gas mask.
I'm guessing you chose the Door Number Two, with the electric car, right? Door number one is a fatal choice - who would ever want to breathe those fumes?

:ehh:
Say breh, can you chill out with all this logic please?:whoa::damn:
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
39,641
Reputation
-2,959
Daps
87,800
I believe livestock emits more greenhouse and more potent greenhouse gas (methane has 23x more effect on climate than CO2) than the transportation sector. Should we kill all the cows too? Is it better we kill some of the people too so that the "earth mother" stays safe?
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,704
Reputation
9,167
Daps
142,915
I believe livestock emits more greenhouse and more potent greenhouse gas (methane has 23x more effect on climate than CO2) than the transportation sector. Should we kill all the cows too? Is it better we kill some of the people too so that the "earth mother" stays safe?
Hmm I prefer to not to entertain irrational hypotheticals. Obviously killing random humans is a larger cost than benefit for most moral human beings.

At the moment large pastures and grazing of cows to make food is an at the moment, tolerated cost for food.

Now if we can eventually get technology up to a point where we can manufacture meats in a lab at a reasonable cost, in a short enough amount of time, then society would be foolish not invest in that as an alternative.

You know how natural gas is more efficient, cleaner, and progressively cheaper and so now coal is out of favor and we don't have to worry about massive smog clouds in our city due to coal plants like 19th century London? Perhaps alternative sources of energy can eventually take on the same role with some benefits in the process.

It's not all or nothing, right now.

Most people really don't have a good defense for being against other forms of energy except being unknowingly unpaid shills for oil companies.
 

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,318
Reputation
3,285
Daps
30,749
I believe livestock emits more greenhouse and more potent greenhouse gas (methane has 23x more effect on climate than CO2) than the transportation sector. Should we kill all the cows too? Is it better we kill some of the people too so that the "earth mother" stays safe?

Human beings should absolutely consume less meat and milk, that is correct :ehh:
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
39,641
Reputation
-2,959
Daps
87,800
Hmm I prefer to not to entertain irrational hypotheticals. Obviously killing random humans is a larger cost than benefit for most moral human beings.

At the moment large pastures and grazing of cows to make food is an at the moment, tolerated cost for food.

Now if we can eventually get technology up to a point where we can manufacture meats in a lab at a reasonable cost, in a short enough amount of time, then society would be foolish not invest in that as an alternative.

You know how natural gas is more efficient, cleaner, and progressively cheaper and so now coal is out of favor and we don't have to worry about massive smog clouds in our city due to coal plants like 19th century London? Perhaps alternative sources of energy can eventually take onthr same role with some benefits in the process.

It's not all or nothing, right now.

Most people really don't have a good defense for being against other forms of energy except being unwilling and unpaid shills for oil companies.

I with people using naatural gas, but unfornately cronyism in the government has killed natural gas/diesel or petroleum hybrid engines in cars because of the gasoline /oil lobby.

That said I think the market can come up with a solution provided we let it do so.
 
Top