As a man, does hearing that another man cheated on his wife or spouse change your opinion about them

[PartyHeart]

Biologically you can only be pregnant with one man's seed at a time. A man can biologically have 100 different women pregnant at the same time if he can attract that many.

Biologically a man is not wired to have another man's seed around him and will do something about it if left unchecked. A woman can do nothing about a man having multiple seeds around her.

There's nothing polygamous about a womans biology what so ever. You sound very emotional when you say that women can be biologically polygamous. Biologically no man would raise another man's seed. Women need a system created by men to cultivate behavior like this. Biologically your child by another man is in danger being around even the weakest of men, we aren't nurturing like that.

No offense but please stop talking about women's biology. Just stick to men's. Most of the time you guys are wrong in that too, but its worse seeing someone speak with such authority on women's biology knowing they have no idea about it and have never in their life even researched it.

In the first place, from an evolutionary standpoint there is zero advantage to being able to have 100 children at once. Not for men or for women. Because evolutionary theory says you want to have offspring that survive, not just have offspring or the potential to have offspring. You would need to have immense resources for having 100 children at once to even have any semblance of a benefit, otherwise what would be the point since you cannot take care of them and ensure their survival? Biological imperative is to have actual offspring that survive and carry on your bloodline, not just to impregnate/get pregnant.

So a man having one child that survives and thrives >>> a man getting 10 women pregnant and none of them surviving or surviving and not thriving.

Secondly, purely from a biological perspective women are attracted to a wide varying range of men throughout our cycles. That is not the behavior of someone who is naturally monogamous. Women even have the advantage of always knowing their children are theirs, unlike men. There isn't a real need for us to be around one partner (aka pair bond/create a monogamous relationship) and police him to help ensure our kids are our kids either. That need exists heavily for men.

The differences in the way men and women behave sexually are purely socially taught.

 

[Ms.CuriousCat]

Biologically you can only be pregnant with one man's seed at a time. A man can biologically have 100 different women pregnant at the same time if he can attract that many.

Biologically a man is not wired to have another man's seed around him and will do something about it if left unchecked. A woman can do nothing about a man having multiple seeds around her.

There's nothing polygamous about a womans biology what so ever. You sound very emotional when you say that women can be biologically polygamous.

Yes it takes 9 months to grow a baby, as long as she can be stealthy about it, a married woman still decides whose baby it is, doesn't have to be her husband's. There's a reason why "and on the eighteenth birthday he found out it wasn't his" is a famous line. Pregnancy isn't a cheating deterrent. In fact because of all the effort and time it takes biology pushes the female to find the best available genetic match in the first place, hopefully that's the man she had already chosen to marry but there's always greener grass.

Also unless the person is a murderer there's nothing much anyone can do about someone cheating other than take their money. Financially who has more to lose? For a woman who cheats, if her ex husband doesn't have to pay alimony or child support, then the biological father has to.

A man can have 100 babies, that's 100 child support cheques.

 

[PartyHeart]

ITS NOT HARD FOR YOU BECAUSE YOU DONT HAVE A dikk AND BALLS.

Testosterone is the main driver of sexual drive. Men have it at astronomical levels. Can't stand when women act as if there sex drives are on the same levels of men.

That isn't the way any of this works. Women do not need the same amount of testosterone to get as physically stimulated as men.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

That isn't the way any of this works. Women do not need the same amount of testosterone to get as physically stimulated as men.

Irregardless of how much of the hormones is needed to become physically stimulated, the reality is the male genitalia secrets large amounts of Testosterone. Stop acting as if testosterone levels are irrelevant.

And as someone in the medical field, im fairly certain im far more well versed on how "all this works" than you are.

Stay in your lane.

 

[Shorty K]

Yes it takes 9 months to grow a baby, as long as she can be stealthy about it, a married woman still decides whose baby it is, doesn't have to be her husband's. There's a reason why "and on the eighteenth birthday he found out it wasn't his" is a famous line. Pregnancy isn't a cheating deterrent. In fact because of all the effort and time it takes biology pushes the female to find the best available genetic match in the first place, hopefully that's the man she had already chosen to marry but there's always greener grass.

Also unless the person is a murderer there's nothing much anyone can do about someone cheating other than take their money. Financially who has more to lose? For a woman who cheats, if her ex husband doesn't have to pay alimony or child support, then the biological father has to.

A man can have 100 babies, that's 100 child support cheques.

Your problem is rather than going by pure science, you use man made systems like child support to try and back up your rationale that women are polygamous. This is because you cannot keep this argument scientific for it to work.

Now I ask you to rework your argument to keep it purely scientific and biological. If you can't keep your argument scientific you must concede there is no valid scientific reasoning for your line of thought.

 

[Mowgli]

I can honestly say I don't give a damn.

You take a up standing good dude who takes care of his business and I hear he cheated on his wife, I wouldn't care

Not really.

Women get fat and run their mouth to much while simultaneously not assisting their spouse in his never ending mission to bust nuts.

This is a prescription for infidelity so no i cant say i would look at a man some kind of way unless i am somehow aware his woman is handling business.

 

[PartyHeart]

Irregardless of how much of the hormones is needed to become physically stimulated, the reality is the male genitalia secrets large amounts of Testosterone. Stop acting as if testosterone levels are irrelevant.

And as someone in the medical field, im fairly certain im far more well versed on how "all this works" than you are.

Stay in your lane.

I'm in science as well. And sorry but if you think you men having higher level of testosterone equals men always having higher sex drives than women, or even on average, you simply do not know how any of this works.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

I'm in science as well. And sorry but if you think you men having higher level of testosterone equals men always having higher sex drives than women, or even on average, you simply do not know how any of this works.

Why don't you educate me on hormones and how they work then.

 

[Shorty K]

No offense but please stop talking about women's biology. Just stick to men's. Most of the time you guys are wrong in that too, but its worse seeing someone speak with such authority on women's biology knowing they have no idea about it and have never in their life even researched it.

In the first place, from an evolutionary standpoint there is zero advantage to being able to have 100 children at once. Not for men or for women. Because evolutionary theory says you want to have offspring that survive, not just have offspring or the potential to have offspring. You would need to have immense resources for having 100 children at once to even have any semblance of a benefit, otherwise what would be the point since you cannot take care of them and ensure their survival? Biological imperative is to have actual offspring that survive and carry on your bloodline, not just to impregnate/get pregnant.

So a man having one child that survives and thrives >>> a man getting 10 women pregnant and none of them surviving or surviving and not thriving.

Secondly, purely from a biological perspective women are attracted to a wide varying range of men throughout our cycles. That is not the behavior of someone who is naturally monogamous. Women even have the advantage of always knowing their children are theirs, unlike men. There isn't a real need for us to be around one partner (aka pair bond/create a monogamous relationship) and police him to help ensure our kids are our kids either. That need exists heavily for men.

The differences in the way men and women behave sexually are purely socially taught.

You sound very emotional in this post. Does it legitimately anger you that men are biologically polygamous and women are monogamous? Does it hurt your feelings? Do you wish your body was more suited to absorb multiple seeds and be a creature capable of practicing polygamy? I'm trying to understand the outrage. It seems like pure envy in this post, tbh.

 

[PartyHeart]

Why don't you educate me on hormones and how they work then.

You have Google dear. I was just letting you know you're wrong in your equating sexual drive to testosterone levels, but I'm not going to do the work for you.

 

[EA]

Although I don't believe in cheating, everyone makes mistakes. One of my closest friends cheated on his girl and called her to confess straight after he did the deed because he was so overwhelmed with guilt . Sometimes, good men just let life get in the way and start thinking with their dikks instead of their hearts.

If you're just a scumbag who cheats then I can't really have you around me tbh. The type that say they're your boy but they're sizing up your girl in their head, wondering if they could fukk her if they tried.

 

[PartyHeart]

You sound very emotional in this post. Does it legitimately anger you that men are biologically polygamous and women are monogamous? Does it hurt your feelings? Do you wish your body was more suited to absorb multiple seeds? I'm trying to understand the outrage.

Lol What?
Ask for an answer that is purely scientific and biological, get one, and then deflect to lying about the other person being outraged so you don't have to address the science and biology you asked for brehs

 

[Geek Nasty]

Yes, the only exception I make is for dudes who have extreme wealth or fame. They're playing a whole different ballgame.

 

[Shorty K]

Lol What?
Ask for an answer that is purely scientific and biological, get one, and then deflect to lying about the other person being outraged so you don't have to address the science and biology you asked for brehs

Right I asked another poster for scientific reasoning. You stepped in and provided pseudoscientific nonsense.

For example, scientifically having a community of 100 children by 100 different women is biologically MUCH more beneficial than having 1 child by 1 woman. An army is much stronger than a tag team. There is nothing scientific in that line of reasoning at all and it actually goes against all logic and common sense. You're really tryna say your seed has a better chance of survival with 0 siblings than 100. Nonsense. Only someone who is monogamous in nature biologically could be so narrow sighted in their thinking.

Come with the science or don't come at all in your next post, thanks.

 

[SheWantTheD]

Yeah, some of the guys I've worked with either cheated on their woman or at least tried to.

It just makes me ask the question.. "where's the loyalty at nowadays?".