the cac mamba
Veteran
trannies dont have any fukkin history for you to throw that bullshyt around
i dont put trannies and actual historically oppressed identities in the same sentence
As Trump rolls back lbgtq protections let's revisit @DEAD7's statment
- Thread starter Pressure
- Start date
i dont put trannies and actual historically oppressed identities in the same sentence
SMH...
James has literally called out dudes on here for posting nothing more than just a link in a new thread. He has come out and talked shyt on ppl for not posting any commentary and yet he does this thread? and dudes like you back him up? what the fukk kind of moderation is that?
this thread isn't about policy, its a personal attack on another member of this forum. Either you recognize that this is Higher Learning, and you abide by those principles or you don't and GTFOH.
if this post was about the policy, he would have linked it to the specific policy he is talking about, then added some commentary on it. even if it was directed at another member of this forum, then at least there would be some stance to debate.
the cac mamba
Veteran
like i said, it sounds like trump is taking the horrific step of telling men with penises that they have to identify as men with penises. to label me "mad" is a gross distortion of the truthTwo of the worst posters on here are the only two posters posting who don't know what's going on.
the cac mamba
Veteran
theres no link in the OP, no story, no information. just a snide remark and an attempt to smear another poster
easily the worst high horse attempt ive seen in a while
trannies dont have any fukkin history for you to throw that bullshyt around
the cac mamba
Veteran
would you agree that this thread is complete garbage? read the fukkin OP and tell me that this was started in good faith
The fact that a thread like this could be made and championed by a fukkin moderator of this forum no less, goes to show what really goes on in here.theres no link in the OP, no story, no information. just a snide remark and an attempt to smear another poster
wouldn't want to step outside the "group(think)", at all.
now, if this thread was made with ANY good intentions, then start by posting the policy that is being rolled back, and your thoughts on it.
from there we can start some real dialogue....if that is even what you guys want.
The GOP without question prefers Trump. Nothing in their actions suggests otherwise.
Even further Mike Pence also seems to prefer Trump.
There's no logical way I can conclude that Pence is unhappy with Trump.
This is no longer the party of Bush.
Dudes with the most post in the thread haven't bothered to inform themselves.
Ironically, Nap has cross posted about the policy in question across multiplethreads.
Sorry kids, I'm not going to tell you which page in the book the discussion is around. Do your readings before coming to school.
The best part is the policy rollback in question is mentioned in this thread.
Ironically, Nap has cross posted about the policy in question across multiplethreads.
Sorry kids, I'm not going to tell you which page in the book the discussion is around. Do your readings before coming to school.
The best part is the policy rollback in question is mentioned in this thread.
I literally linked it and they just focus on "well duh nobody should be forced to take pictures for a faq wedding" despite that the entire fukking thing is all about how nobody even demanded or asked for that service. The point, that the assemblance of stupidity so astutely missed, is that it is to make precedent in court to roll back any discrimination ordinances based on sexual orientation which means that you can use "religious grounds" to deny gay people anything you want since there is no federal protection statute. Including housing, insurance benefits, on and on and on.Dudes with the most post in the thread haven't bothered to inform themselves.
Ironically, Nap has cross posted about the policy in question across multiplethreads.
Sorry kids, I'm not going to tell you which page in the book the discussion is around. Do your readings before coming to school.
The best part is the policy rollback in question is mentioned in this thread.
This is not fukking hard to comprehend here. It's 2+2=4 level shyt. And this isn't just a gay issue. This is an effort to peel back civil rights for everybody, they just start with the easier targets.
It's a trash thread, but that doesn't mean you needed to jump in with the trolls.
the cac mamba
Veteran
well, fair enough
im done in here anyway. i cant compete with such intellectual giants 
LOL, this is your higher learning y'allDudes with the most post in the thread haven't bothered to inform themselves.
Ironically, Nap has cross posted about the policy in question across multiplethreads.
Sorry kids, I'm not going to tell you which page in the book the discussion is around. Do your readings before coming to school.
The best part is the policy rollback in question is mentioned in this thread.
"I'm just gonna make a random thread about a random subject, and it's on YOU to figure out what I'm talkin about and how I feel about it"
then to follow up with "I'm just gonna let other ppl in this thread CARRY my thread because I can't."
bruh go back and read the subheadline of this forum...
Higher Learning
Politics, World & Domestic News, Breaking News, Science and Religion. Informed and Education Discussion Only. No Trolling
instead of attacking me for suggesting a better OP, why not just admit that this thread was baseless from the start. and the onus should be on the Op to provide that information and not just a pathetic attempt to troll HL.
In fact, I haven't even addressed any policy in here, just the fact that this thread is trash. Shouldn't HL have higher expectations for the content in here? or are you guys so stuck on "sides" that you'd rather tolerate this type of shyt posting because he's on "your side".
we can talk policy all day, but this thread was completely disingenuous from the start.