The Fade
I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
nikkas need to hurry up and invent skynetI honestly think A.I would be better for this world than it’s current leaders.
Asked chat ai how to solve the gun violence issues in amerikka
- Thread starter T-K-G
- Start date
Then what happens when skynet looks at crime stats and realizes that young black men commit most of the gun violence?
People go on about how racist AIs are, then advocate they be in charge...
get these nets
Veteran
It would be. But unless the state mandates regular screening for mental issues, lot of people would still go undiagnosed.
I honestly think A.I would be better for this world than it’s current leaders.
you'sa got damn idiot. We all know how that ends
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Just add a generous national gun buyback program with no questions asked at delivery (though still useable if connected to a open case) and yeah AmericA could significantly reduce gun violence in a decade and the majority of gun owners could still keep the majority of their guns if they wanted.This is what it spat out, I told it to use legislation.
The issue of gun violence in America is complex, and there is no single solution that will solve the problem. However, legislation is one of the most effective means to address the issue. Here is a step-by-step plan to solve gun violence issues in America using legislation:
1. Comprehensive Background Checks: Enact comprehensive background check legislation for anyone purchasing a firearm. This legislation should include measures that close loopholes currently present in the system. For example, it should close the “gun show loophole,” and require all private gun sales to go through a background check.
2. Ban High-Capacity Magazines and Assault Weapons: Enact legislation that bans high-capacity magazines and assault weapons, as they are often used in mass shootings.
3. Red Flag Laws: Enact red flag laws that allow law enforcement officials to temporarily restrict a person's access to firearms if they are deemed a threat to themselves or others.
4. Increase Funding for Gun Violence Research: Increase funding for gun violence research, which has been severely limited due to political pressure.
5. Gun Licensing and Registration: Create and implement a national gun licensing and registration system. This would require individuals to obtain a license and register their firearms, similar to the process for obtaining a driver's license.
6. Strict Gun Dealer Regulations: Enact strict regulations for gun dealers, including increased security measures and licensing requirements. This will ensure that firearms do not end up in the wrong hands.
7. Increase Penalties for Gun Trafficking: Increase penalties for gun trafficking, which is a major contributor to gun violence in America.
8. Increase Funding for Community Interventions: Increase funding for community-based interventions that address the root causes of gun violence, such as poverty, lack of educational opportunities, and mental health issues.
In conclusion, the issue of gun violence in America is complex, but legislation can help to significantly reduce it. Comprehensive background checks, ban on high-capacity magazines and assault weapons, red flag laws, gun licensing and registration, strict gun dealer regulations, increased penalties for gun trafficking, and increased funding for community interventions are all measures that can be taken to address the issue.
did I just get hit with a copy and paste? Is this the general argument used politibrehs?
A gun registry makes it possible to track where criminals got their gun from, which shouldn't hurt the legit dealers at all. It will only impact the ones who are running guns to criminals who can't legally buy. Why are you against that?
They don't "ignore" them, they have to take the plea bargain because it's impossible to get a conviction in court. The "buyer" just says, "I'm sorry, the gun was stolen from my house" or "I didn't sell it to that guy, I sold it to some other guy and I don't know what happened next." I've seen federal D.A.'s say that a straw purchaser doesn't even have to make up a story, he can just keep his mouth shut, and unless the guy he got it for rats him out, they can't prove charges in court. Without a national gun registry, the mere fact that the criminal has the gun now isn't enough to prove the straw purchaser gave it to him.
If you make a registry, then purchasers have to report every time they resell the gun or if it gets stolen and is no longer in their possession, and their gunrunning deal will flounder because they're going to actually have to account for all their guns now.
Breh, I've PERSONALLY dealt with an FFL dealer numerous times that dealt with a straw purchaser once. FFL dealers all keep ledgers of who is buying a firearm from them and transfers or online transactions. He had a guy buy a couple of guns as a straw and the guy was on camera doing it, signed all the paperwork, then the gun was used by his friend in a shooting. Both of them got arrested but the guy didn't get the felony charge after admitting to making the straw purchase. ATF came in and shut the dealer down over that fool
saturn7
Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
Criminals can make weapons that can't be traced now or just steal weapons (which can be tracked). Legit dealers already deal with a ton of paper work as far as keeping records of weapons and their serial numbers and these FFL's get audited by the ATF. We have more than enough rules and regulations.
Any kind of state or national gun registry is just the first step to state abuse and eventual confiscation of weapons.
A national gun registry is also Unconstitutional IIRC, in part due to fear of state abuse.
They're already laws in place that prosecutors ignore. Dudes will get caught with a gun doing a violent crime that was obtained via straw purchase and instead of both the "buyer" and user getting automatic felony charges they'll both get reductions like probation.
A person can shoot at someone in a car and literally just get probation for a possible attempted murder
I've heard attorney's advertising on hip-hop stations that they can get you off a gun charge. Sh*t is deeper than people want to admit.
A miniscule amount of gun crime is committed with ghost or stolen guns. The majority is committed with black market guns and straw purchases.
Legit dealers wouldn't be impacted because they already report anyway. And regular private people don't move enough guns for this to be a huge burden. The only people impacted would be the ones who are moving high numbers of guns without registering as legitimate dealers....and an oversized percentage of those types are funneling guns to criminals.
Stupid tinfoil hat shyt. The government could already confiscate 95% of the legal weapons in the country already without no registry. They generally know where the legal guns are, that's not the problem. The problem is being able to prove who made the illegal transfer in court.
But you full well know that mass gun confiscation is NEVER going to happen in this country. How would that pass constitutional muster? How would that work out practically without civil war in the streets? How many cops would even go along with it?
lol, there is nothing in the Constitution prohibiting a gun registry.
Sorry, Mandatory Gun Registration Is Constitutional
Second Amendment Advocates Don't Like It, But It May Be Permissible; A Lawsuit Against Washington, D.C. Could Decide The Question
www.cbsnews.com
Breh, I've PERSONALLY dealt with an FFL dealer numerous times that dealt with a straw purchaser once. FFL dealers all keep ledgers of who is buying a firearm from them and transfers or online transactions. He had a guy buy a couple of guns as a straw and the guy was on camera doing it, signed all the paperwork, then the gun was used by his friend in a shooting. Both of them got arrested but the guy didn't get the felony charge after admitting to making the straw purchase. ATF came in and shut the dealer down over that fool
Breh, we're seeing the same thing, you just don't understand why.
I think straw purchases aren't prosecuted because they're difficult to prove in court considering how the laws are currently written and the lack of a required registry and proof of transfer. That's the same thing the people who actually run shyt say.
Meanwhile, your theory is that......every state and federal prosecutor, regardless of party, just happens to have an inexplicable blind spot when it comes to gun crime?
Yeah as long as it stays in minority communities they don't have an incentive to put effort into cases. Also if it doesn't have an affect on predominantly yt areas it isn't important. As soon as that gun violence steps over that redline, that's when it becomes all hands on deck. The mayor of Cleveland had a press conference about holding prosecutors accountable because the homicide rate has gotten out of control, then a week later we had a mass shooting in downtown Cleveland.
9 shot in downtown Cleveland; no suspect in custody
The police department said it is offering a reward of up to $5,000 for tips.
www.nbcnews.com
The dude shot into a crowd outside of a club and honestly the only reason he got caught within 2 days is because a restauranter offered a $50k reward for his arrest.
We also had a recent incident in which a 21 year old was caught with a bunch glock switches.
Man accused of selling ‘Glock switches,’ including one linked to Cleveland, Cleveland Heights shootings
D'Aundre Fraizer, 21, is accused of selling devices that make semi automatic handguns fire like automatic guns, including one device linked to two shootings.
www.cleveland.com
I'll follow these cases and see what happens.
We
No we all watched The Terminator and the Matrix , goddamn movies
Last edited:
But that's an invented distinction. Straw purchases aren't being charged regardless of what community they're in, and that's been true for decades.