These nikkaz not even bothering to dispute the math 
At least Dawkins would argue the math, you nikkaz all
Well, when atheists are not agreeing to logic, nor are willing/able to make an attempt to disprove it, that's religion, time for me to bow out of this thread, you atheists need to turn in your bandanas, y'all false flaggin' 
Dangling a red herring are we?And I meant logist, because I didn't want to specify the science, but back to my point. Now, please clearly explain to me the logical difference between not believing something is not true, but not willing to claim that your belief is correct, and believing something is true, and claiming that your believe is correct, I'll be waiting
Now of course, the scientist is me wants to tell you that please explain how the use of a ternary truth table to logically prove my claims is a sign my brain is out of order, because I'd like to hear you as a rational, probably science orientated atheist disprove my statements, I only seek to gain knowledge, and have intelligent discourse. But the negro in me is like 
ok breh you win, people from a distance can't tell whose the fool. If you're not going to argue the science/logic, I have to bow out breh, you've become irrational, no need to continue quoting me, you and your fellow atheist priests and continue to high five each other and brag about your intellectual superiority 
I am only responding because you quoted me. So class, what have we learned about atheists today?
1) They mock people with beliefs in things not being able to be proven
2) They mock what they don't understand
3) When you remove religion and present them with the contradictions in their logic, they resort to ad hominems
4) Atheists also feel the need to resort to violence when you don't agree with their view points
Yes, atheism is nothing like any other religious sect
You atheists are othodox with the faith, real talkwith it, on some "la la la can't hear you" type sh*t
NoMayo15 said:
All you're doing is listing why you're angry...not defending your "beliefs"
And what makes atheism a religion?
Is turning the TV Off a channel?
. Participation is a key factor to what we call the belief system, or what I call the God gene. Animals are true atheists, they have no set of beliefs, and animal doesn't know right from wrong unless its trained. They eat, f*ck, kill, sh*t, and sleep in no particular order, going from one day to the next without a care in the world until their belly is empty. So essentially animals aren't even watching the TV.
Yes, by the logic, you being an agnostic atheist is the same as being a theist who claims what he believes to be true. Whether that deity is Allah or Yahweh is subject to discussion, but yes, that's what the logic states, don't argue with me, disprove the logic, that's all you need to do
no that's his point
False.Ahhhh, now we're getting somewhere. Ok my friend, I'll continue rocking with you, respect your questions, and no, I'm not angry, in fact, I'm quite entertained by the development of this thread, I hold atheists to a higher intellectual standard having met a few in college, most of whom were smarter than me, I never expected the thread to end up with ad hominems and threats of violence
Thats the most bullshyt pseudo-science, uninformed pile of garbage you've managed to put together.Now as HUMANS, by NATURE, we're ALWAYS watching the TV. It's nothing you can do about it. You as a human are self-aware, even the most secluded tribes have belief systems. So you may not want to watch the TV, but you're aware it's on. In other words, you may agree/disagree with certain things, but you're AWARE, not consciously, but sub-consciously. It's your fate as the dominant species on this planet, it's what separates you from the rest of the mammals. That's why I call it the "God gene". You as a human can't avoid having a belief, even if that belief is to believe in nothing
My position isn't of negating if a god exists, its that one has not been demonstrated TO exist, and even further, in the judeochristian fashion.
