Azealia Banks doesn't date Black Men

[mcdivit85]

nikkas on this site told me you can still be pro black and date outside the race

they also said kids of white/black will be black since black is the dominant gene and they are seen as black in america so there is no issue

yall nikkas need to chill, no issue here

Yea, weren't dudes on here saying they could date and marry non-black but still be pro-black? And have bi-racials that are still black by definition?

Guess that only works for black men

Peace

 

[Johnny Vulture]

Remember not to seem upset over this because that means you somehow feel rejected that Azealia Banks is taking her talents to Bangbros

 

[Heretic]

You guys only give black women that "so long as you don't trash black folks" speech. Save it for your brehs ok.

Isn't that exactly what I said? I said if she chooses to date white men then let her date white men. I don't care who she chooses to lay with. Now you say so long as you don't trash black folks as if that's a requirement to date outside of your race. Are you disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing? That same overgeneralization is an unnecessary cop out because we both know all black men aren't like she claims at all. You can't be a hypocrite only to suit your agenda. You can't try to be a champion for black people as Azalea tries to be and then take the same view as those you go against towards your own people because what you do then is enforce stereotypes. What I said specifically was, if you're going to date white men or women exclusively then just be transparent about and say it's just your preference. Because by her or anyone else saying I don't date black men or women because they are all so an so is blatantly false when I can personally disprove that notion by simply looking at my parents or siblings or even my friends. Just say you date outside of your race because that's what YOU are attracted to. Not because the entire race is undateable.

 

[Blackout]

She is not crazy...a lot of what she says makes perfect sense.Just because you don't understand where she is coming from doesn't makes her crazy.& I actually respect what she said.

Pretending that good black men dont exist is quite crazy.

I am so amazed how chicks like her just shyt on all the good black men on this earth.

 

[Sk3ptical]

and this ugly whore got the nerve to go at the rap queen Iggy

t.i. needs to end this no talent slut career asap

 

[Sk3ptical]

Unlike you nikkas I don't care who she chooses to fukk. My self esteem ain't tied to some random black woman's p*ssy. fukk outta here
The real reason you nikkas are so upset is because, even though according to yall she ain't shyt, you nikkas still feel personally rejected by her fukking white men. You nikkas are really hurting. If this is the shyt that rile you nikkas up then y'all need some real fukking problems in your lives.

hurt by a burnt dusty p*ssy bytch

 

[Premeditated]

I actually find Azealia waaay more beautiful than Doug.

that's why I said "most" and not all.

 

[godkiller]

According to y'all nikkas she ain't shyt to begin with so why y'all so upset about who she chooses to fukk? Its her p*ssy and she can do whatever it is she wants with it. Y'all some really miserable ass nikkas. At least to her, a CAC isnt a sniveling little bytch like y'all. If her choice is to put up with the low self-esteem and fragile ego of the typical nikka, or fukk with old CACs then I don't blame her one bit for her choice.

It's the principle: she is insulting black men and privileging cacs over blacks, which is a form of white supremacy. The fact she ain't shyt and never will be shyt (as clearly evidenced by the fact nobody buys her music), is besides the point. Every white women in history wasn't shyt to cacs but cacs never let white women date nikkas, period. nikkas are rightfully mad at her hypocrisy and anti-black maleness, your nonsensical post besides.

 

[Premeditated]

I mean y'all can't say she's an ugly girl, I know y'all saying that because she's a c00n but you can't tell me...you guys actually believe she's ugly...

yes the hell e can. I understand why you're caping for her though. Aren't you Binary? Yeah...yall both kind of look alike so us saying she's beat probably makes your ear hot.

 

[godkiller]

Keep living in your fantasy world nerd revenge fantasies. As I said black women have zero to lose by throwing black men under the bus because black men have offered nothing but tall tales, "shoulda coulda woulda" and "Im about to" nonsense.

We have nothing to lose. No functioning communities, marriages, families, economy....nothing.

So you basically despise black people and think we have nothing to lose because black people are not worth anything. After all, according to you, because black people don't have the same level of economy, community, etc, therefore we have nothing worth defending against white men and white supremacy. Reconciling your support for Azealia Banks' with the above logic, the natural logical conclusion that is you think that rather than fight for our people, culture, community and advancement, blacks are better off abandoning it all for the "greener pastures of white men and white supremacy", whom have all of what you desire.

Notice, readers, how disgusting, treasonous, and anti-black the logical conclusions of the bedwench truly is? And notice how dangerous the ideas of these anti-black white worshippers are if never challenged, as retards like @Family Man suggest we should do?

Things like black peoplehood, culture, community, race apparently mean nothing to the bedwench. And unless black men satisfy them or black people reach some arbitrary level of society, we are nothing to the bedwench. They do the white man's work to destroy black people without his lifting a hand or uttering a word. And the bed wench begs your support or indifference in doing so.

 

[Gravity]

Talks sh#t about white people and white supremacy.....but still prefers to date white......sounds like most of the dudes on The Coli

I don't know why dudes talking so much sh#t about this girl when they follow her blueprint

Peace

Name names chump. You c00ns/crackers always come with broad generalizations used as deflections/distractions to save another c00n/cracker. Show that rhe same posters in here calling Banks out are the same ones who claim pro black while preferring white women. Otherwise you're just full of shyt.

 

[Sk3ptical]

I actually find Azealia waaay more beautiful than Doug.

what u smoking

 

[mcdivit85]

Name names chump. You c00ns/crackers always come with broad generalizations used as deflections/distractions to save another c00n/cracker. Show that rhe same posters in here calling Banks out are the same ones who claim pro black while preferring white women. Otherwise you're just full of shyt.

Too many threads and too many names. The fact that you seem so upset by my typing may signal that you are one of them.

Do you decry white supremacy and while being enamored by the daughters of your oppressor?

Peace

 

[Blackout]

So you basically hate black people and think we have nothing to lose because black people are not worth anything. After all, black people don't have the same level of economy, community, etc as cacs.

So in essence you are a self hater who thinks black people are inferior to white people by way of what they have and what we don't. With respects to Azealia Banks, you are anti-black white worshipper approving of another anti-black white worshipper. @Family Man dapes and agrees with you. The Coli is supposed to take you both seriously.

Like I said they either want to build with us or jump ship.

She is doing the latter.

 

[godkiller]

Right, I'll answer those silly hypothetical non sequiter questions once you get a response from the c00ns in here. Yall get real gangsta when it comes to what a black woman does with her coochie. But that seems to be the only time yall want to step up.

I need no answer from you as, you'll notice, I asked you no question in my post. Rather I examined your logic and reasoning to its logical conclusion -- and then I laid it bare for all to see. You implied yourself that the black race is not worth protecting because we have not reached a satisfactory level of "economy, marriage, community", etc. Essentially you say black people are not worth anything because we are not civilized enough. As such, destroying ourselves and capitulating to white supremacy is OK, even preferable since whites have so much of what you desire in community, functionality, etc. White supremacists say the same thing. So you and them are different only in appearance, not in thinking. This is an opinion gathered from evidence, and not a question.

Too many threads and too many names. The fact that you seem so upset by my typing may signal that you are one of them.

Do you decry white supremacy and while being enamored by the daughters of your oppressor?

Peace

If I were enamored with the daughters of my oppressor, that would not be so bad as being enamored with the oppressor himself. After all, was it the daughters of the oppressor that enslaved blacks and wiped out the Natives, Maoris, etc? No. So obviously one must treat the oppressor differently than would be anything else. This is common sense. Merely because something is similar in kind does not mean it is similar in type. The Natives made this mistake in classifying the killing by their own peoples as the same killing the Spanairds did. The Natives thought all killing was the same, like you think all c00nery is the same and women think sexism is the same as racism. History says the Natives were wrong, and they paid dearly for it (I will go into detail in the following paragraph).

But besides that logic, the appropriate thing to do when one sees two wrongs is to stop the other wrong, not to ignore both and make excuses by saying, "Well you do the same thing'.

The Natives tried that. They used to war against each other and say, "Well the Aztecs kill Natives too, so why put anymore blame on the Spanairds?" And, strictly speaking, the other Native tribes who fought the Aztecs alongside the Spanairds, were right: the Aztecs did kill other Natives like the Spanairds did. But the Aztecs were Natives themselves and the Natives variously killed each for generations without any ill consequence. Warring between tribes is a natural part of human life. History proved it was the Spanairds--not the hegemonic Aztecs that murdered scores of Natives and sacrificed the rest to pagan gods--whose killing mattered. When the Aztecs fell, the Spanairds' greatest form of resistance fell with them and the latter went on to destroy every last Native in South America. So perhaps there was a difference between the oppressor's killing and others, like I implied there is a difference between the oppressor and his daughter, then? Pity the Natives did not realize it. The Europeans did. The Europeans did not focus on killing other Europeans--who killed more Europeans than any other group--over killing Natives. Why? Because the Europeans knew there was a difference between an Englishman killing a Spanaird and a Native killing both. Rather than focus on their regional enemies, Europeans focused on DIVIDE AND CONQUERING between them. They fought their prejudices, DIVIDED AND CONQUERED THE AMERICAS, and won for it. The Europeans realized whose killing mattered (i.e. the Natives) and whose didn't (i.e. the other Europeans').