Azealia Banks doesn't date Black Men

mcdivit85

Superstar
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
4,529
Reputation
3,660
Daps
18,340
Reppin
Sound Reasoning
It should be easy if there are many threads and many names to pick a few and post it.

:beli:

Is there not a running joke on The Coli, the site we're on just in case you forgot, about "Coli Militants" talking sh#t about white people only to lay up with white people? Or did you just catch a case of amnesia?

I'm not looking up sh#t about something that gets discussed everyday:pachaha:

Peace
 

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
42,722
Reputation
9,800
Daps
155,719
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
This is why it was so amusing that all these c00ns on The Coli were caping for her when she on her bullshyt a few months back

Smart dumb nikkas will believe anything
 

Scott Larock

Its hard leaving thecoli but I gotta find a way...
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
8,678
Reputation
350
Daps
18,031
Reppin
Hell
She doesn't hesitate to spit about her disdain for white folks though







She goes harder than a lot of you n!ggas on here
this chick has done a good job of alienating herself from pretty much everybody

she says all kind of racist and hateful shyt towards whites, which means no self-respecting white man is going to do any more than dump a load in her. And then says she doesn't want to date black men....

yeah good luck with all that:smugdraper: hope you like them asian peckers

she's stuck in the middle and she realizes that, most black men aren't tricks and won't wine and dine her like what she really wants,

Most white dudes will see her as a piece of meat that will nut in a condom and save the kids (aka transfer the wealth) to a woman who moreso resembles them.

She's not going to get what she wants, most women who bedwench realize this, date white while young, pray for marriage and to find a white man and who doesn't care about this bloodline lol

Or get with a good brother but bring something to the table cuz he ain't messing with you if you broke.

Patriarchy, that's the end game for most of them, that's why they talk so reckless about black men.


Her statements were so stupid...

A black male dominated field that can possibly be income and a system of protection for black people period but she bashes it in favor of white men who have a history of seeing them as sex slaves

You can't make this up if you tried,

Instead of building something for blacks to create, to provide for future generations much like jews and italians, she's bashing black men

:francis:
 

AntiVenom

Bedwench & Armchair Militant Killer
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,633
Reputation
-180
Daps
2,932
Reppin
NULL

Banks' experiencing sexism doesn't justify anti-blackness. If a woman is mad about sexism--or person is mad about kidnapping--said woman or person should variously rail against sexism or kidnapping, not take kidnapping further by committing murder or expressing racist sentiments against your own group. I'm a man and I experience sexism too. Becoming a white supremacist and hating black women is not the solution. It also won't help sexism, but rather hurt black people all around. :russ:




Your thoughts are clearly twisted. The fact Banks calls cacs the devil one day and then worships the same cacs following day is absurd. There is nothing admirable about c00nery and anti-blackness because they are "taboo". It is "taboo" for women to molest children too. Following your logic, women should molest children because "fukk it, I'm going to do it". Like I said, you're crazy, stupid or :dead:


BOOOOM!! THANK YOU! But the bedwenches and BWE sluts think that it does.

Very powerful words. You should be member of the year for this post.

[


Every negative image of black women came from white men. And yet you still fukk with them

they dont want to accept this or hear it though and that should tell you everything:russ:

Didn't she call T.I. a c00n for promoting Iggy and help whites profit off a culture that they've been trying to hide since blah blah blah? She was even fake crying on the radio over this.

Nobody cares that she's fukking a white guy, just admit you're too busy "fighting for respect in hip-hop" to date within your race and let people tell you how stupid it sounds.

This contradictory shyt on top of all the arbitrary beefs she uses to stay relevant is why you can't take women under 25 seriously.

This is why we as black men need to start paying very close attention to this new generation of black women. Any of them under the age of 30 are suspect until proven otherwise. I'm not saying be as extreme as I am...but just take what they say with a grain of salt and be hesitant with the cape. This bytch was so insincere and many of them are. All this bytch tried to do was attack and control TI's actions. We need to be hip to this in 2015.
 

mcdivit85

Superstar
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
4,529
Reputation
3,660
Daps
18,340
Reppin
Sound Reasoning
You should try reading my post this time before you post. Maybe then you'll actually see my point before you reply. :snoop:

With respects to black advancement, neither dating white men and women is OK-- likeNatives killing Native people and Spanairds killing Native people--are similarly not OK. But one is worse than the other, and actually has dire consequences, while the other is merely distasteful (again in analogy to the Natives' killing Natives and Spanairds' killing natives). Go back and READ and UNDERSTAND my actual point contained in my previous post and you'll understand which is which.

To wit, history shows us the Natives' choosing to focus on the Spanairds over other Natives, like the Aztecs', killing would indeed be hypocritical. The Natives agreed with you that it would indeed be hypocritical to focus on the Aztecs over Spanairds because the Aztecs murdered more Natives than the Spanairds did at the time. The various Native tribes during Cortez' time accordingly banded together against the Aztecs while ignoring the Spanairds'. History shows they were wrong to do so. The Aztecs' killers were not the true enemies. They had done their deeds for a thousand years and the Natives thrived as a group. After all, the Aztecs were Natives themselves, albeit misguided. History shows us it was the Spanairds whom were the true enemies.

Through helping annihilate the Aztecs, the Natives opened the floodgates to the Spanairds, which led to the Natives' extinction. If only the Aztecs had continued their sacrifices and killings, the Natives would still exist today in the same alarmingly high numbers they once did. As this example shows, not all killing and killers, like all c00nery and c00ns, are like and same. What is similar in kind is not necessarily the same in type. There are degrees and differences. Pity the Natives did not know it.

Bro, I get exactly what you're saying. And I don't need a diatribe on the Aztecs to understand it.

You're saying the same sh#t that n#ggas all over the country say to justify f#cking who they want to f#ck in the first place.

"Black men dating white womenz is distasteful but not bad. But black women dating white men is bad and has DIRE consequences. So, I can get with Becky because she's not my oppressor.....Todd is. Its all about knowing who the real enemy is." :troll:

I just call double talk when I see it. She can't fix her issues with white supremacy by letting a white man between her legs. Well, black men can't fix white supremacy between the legs of his daughter either. :yeshrug:

Peace
 

Will Ross

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,714
Reputation
-6,068
Daps
59,390
Bro, I get exactly what you're saying. And I don't need a diatribe on the Aztecs to understand it.

You're saying the same sh#t that n#ggas all over the country say to justify f#cking who they want to f#ck in the first place.

"Black men dating white womenz is distasteful but not bad. But black women dating white men is bad and has DIRE consequences. So, I can get with Becky because she's not my oppressor.....Todd is. Its all about knowing who the real enemy is." :troll:

I just call double talk when I see it. She can't fix her issues with white supremacy by letting a white man between her legs. Well, black men can't fix white supremacy between the legs of his daughter either. :yeshrug:

Peace

Men and women don't have the same roles in society.
For years it was laws to prevent black men from sleeping with white women.
But white men never had those same rules when it came to black women.
 

AntiVenom

Bedwench & Armchair Militant Killer
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,633
Reputation
-180
Daps
2,932
Reppin
NULL
Some people like whining about the hate that black women get here but the "female" posters here play a part in perpetuating the hate with this kind of passive aggressive bytchiness. From what I've seen the posters claiming to be female are here to antagonize.

This explains it. This is one of the main reasons why women get shyt on around here. If they werent as antagonistic or trying to do some tit for tat bullshyt you'd see them much more welcomed around here. Theyve built their own bed and then they double down on it but a expect a warm welcome. I cant with these sluts.
all you do is flip flop,deflect,and shame black men

:russ:fukk outta here c*nt you ain't doing shyt but flicking your bean and eating ben and jerrys

Thats one of the main deflections of the bedwench. The deflect, ignore, lie or create a smokescreen. When you press them they'll try to pass the buck...its a defense mechanism. Kind of like when a squid tries to shoot ink at you when a threat comes to close. Im glad black men are getting hip to their tactics.

Some people like whining about the hate that black women get here but the "female" posters here play a part in perpetuating the hate with this kind of passive aggressive bytchiness. From what I've seen the posters claiming to be female are here to antagonize.

This explains it. This is one of the main reasons why women get shyt on around here. If they werent as antagonistic or trying to do some tit for tat bullshyt you'd see them much more welcomed around here. The treatment that they get is more than justified. Theyve built their own bed and then they double down on it but a expect a warm welcome. I cant with these sluts
Why do you spread this propoganda?


because she hates you and is your enemy. Stop looking for serious answers and recognize them for what they are.

:ohhh:
Bedwenches supporting bedwenches. Who would've thought.

Tkae careful note as to who supports this woman. Because they share the same set of beliefs and you need to recognize them as the enemy. The bedwench is the trojan horse and dont ever lose sight of that.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,773
Daps
35,659
Reppin
NULL
The Maoris weren't wiped out. There are a shytload of Maoris.

I mentioned a variety of groups, including the Natives, which you chose to ignore as though I hadn't mentioned them but I digress: there are no pure race Maoris left. The race is destroyed. Before the whites, Maoris were about the only type of people in that region.

You wanna know who was wiped out? The Morioris. The Maoris committed genocide by fukkING EATING THEM.

^
The above are all genetically same type of people, Maoris. Even with intratribal squabbles--which happened everywhere, including Europe--the Maoris thrived as people in this region before the Europeans came. Since the European's arrirval and subsequent genocide, all of these people are dead BECAUSE of the Europeans. It is no coincidence the Natives, Australian Aborigines, etc have the same history and fate with respects to Europeans. That these race's death coincides with the European's arrival and warmongering implies that the Europeans are the cause.




So kill the Maoris? Or wait... shyt.. I forgot. Who is the oppressor, again?

You must be a cac. I repeat: Even with intratribal squabbles--which happened everywhere, including Europe--the Maoris thrived as people in this region before the Europeans came. Since the European's arrirval and subsequent genocide, all of these people are dead BECAUSE of the Europeans. It is no coincidence the Natives, Australian Aborigines, etc have the same history and fate with respects to Europeans. That these race's death coincides with the European's arrival and warmongering implies that the Europeans are the cause. So yes, cacs are the oppressor. The oppressors of Natives, Aborigines, Maoris, blacks, etc.


No, you're right, when the Native Americans would capture their enemies and sacrifice them, that was MUCH worse than the Spaniards,

Another bout of nonsense. Native American tribes did indeed sacrifice their neighbours and fight wars. They did this for a thousands of years hitherto the Spanairds, and yet the Native Americans teemed in tremendous numbers across the Americas in spite of their squabbles. The only time things changed was when the Spanairds arrived--like when the other cacs arrived in the Pacific and in Australia, damning the Australian Aborigines and Maoris--and imposed their mengerie of grotesquery including slavery, murder, rape, burning, etc against the Native Americans. So again, evidence points to the notion peoples die when Europeans arirve and impose their genocidal practices. Before then all of the Natives, Maoris, Aborigines, etc all THRIVED in their respective regions. Ironically the Spanairds likely used the same arguments you are using now to sway the Native tribes against the Aztecs. The same arguments which we now know were wrong and led to the Native's extinction. So, the Natives' sacrifices were not "worse" than the Spanairds' killing. The Natives had had the same intertribal conflict since inception and thrived. It was the Spanairds' that deaded them, not the Aztec's.


You must be really impressed with the Spaniards' military prowess if you think they murdered millions of Indians.

who managed to kill millions of Native Americans through old world diseases.

But the Spanairds did kill millions of Indians over hundreds of years (not all at one time). The Taino genocide in the Carribean--where I am from--gives glimpses into how they carried the deed out. The Spanairds singlehandedly wiped out entire Native peoples, not necessarily with military prowess, but military efficiency. Over the course of the centuries, wave and wave of Europeans did the same thing, and THAT is what led to the Natives' extinction. Sickness was only recorded in the Taino region in 1518 by which time a Spanaird priest present during Columbus' voyage, Bartolome de Las Casas, writes the majority of the recorded Taino population was already dead. As the Bartolome de Las Casas (1518) indicates, the Natives were but naked men with spears. The Spanairds, meanwhile, were armored, educated and carried with them more advanced weapons, including war dogs. In places like the Carribean, which is only a small island, the Spanairds could plead and manipulate to great effect. Batholome de Las Casas, who settled in the Taino Carribean region in 1502, writes about the terrible genocide through murder--NOT SICKNESS-- as follows:

The Taino genocide
Fri 20 Sep 2013 by abagond



The Taino genocide (1492-1518) is where the Spanish wiped out most of the Tainos (Arawaks), the native people of the northern Caribbean (present-day Cuba, Jamaica, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Bahamas, etc). Columbus himself set it in motion and oversaw it till 1500.

According to one estimate, genocide and disease wiped out 3 million of the 3.5 million Tainos – 85%. Most were already dead when smallpox arrived in 1518.

Columbus noticed two things about the Tainos:

  1. They wore gold jewellery.
  2. Their most advanced weapon was the spear.
Columbus:

With 50 men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

Columbus made La Taina, the land of the Tainos, into a living hell. It went way beyond simply killing those who fought Spanish rule. The Spanish had the Tainos:

  • grilled,
  • cut up into pieces like sheep,
  • run down by hunting dogs and torn to pieces,
  • strung up and burned alive 13 at a time – in memory of Jesus and his 12 Apostles.


They killed even women and children. Even babies: the Spanish threw babies against rocks and into rivers – and laughed. They cut off pieces of Tainos for entertainment. They cut off their heads for practice. They raped women and girls – and brought back syphilis to Europe. They even raped the wife of a king.

The Spanish were kinder to their animals than to the Tainos.

If a Taino killed a Spaniard, the Spanish killed 100 Tainos in return.

They killed Tainos by the thousands, even those who brought them food and gifts. They killed half the people of the kingdom of Maguana outright.



After the killing fields, the Spanish divided the remaining Tainos among themselves to teach them the Christian faith:

  • For Taino men that meant working in the mines, often being worked to death. As many as 90% died within in three months.
  • For Taino women that meant working the land, even the heavy work that men used to do.
There was so little food that babies died for lack of milk. Children died of hunger by the thousands. Men were worked so hard in the mines that few children were born.

Columbus demanded a certain amount gold or cotton from each Taino over the age of 13. Those who failed to meet his demands had their hands cut off.

All this was shocking behaviour by Western standards of the time.

When there were no longer enough Taino workers left, the Spanish brought inAfrican slaves to take their place.

It was such a hell on earth that:

  • Mothers killed their babies.
  • Mass suicides were common.
Many fled to the mountains, blacks too, fighting the Spanish from there.

Hatuey, one of the Taino kings of Cuba, told his people to throw their gold into the river: the Christians worshipped gold as their god and would kill them for it.

In 1512 when Hatuey was about to be burned at the stake (pictured), a Franciscan brother told him him about the Christian faith to save his soul. When Hatuey found out that most good Christians were going to Heaven, he chose Hell.

Source: Mainly “A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies” (1542) by Bartolome de Las Casas.












Right, Englishmen and Spaniards were both Christian. Killing a fellow Christian was frowned upon by the pope.

The Europeans were known racist and hypocrites. If killing Christians was forbidden, then how to explain all the Spanaird and English wars, skirmishes, etc which happened over hundreds of years? The Spanairds themselves recited words from the scripture as they carried out attacks on innocent Native groups.[/quote][/quote]
 
Last edited:

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,773
Daps
35,659
Reppin
NULL
This is more primary evidence (written by people who witnesssed the atrocities) of the Native genocide(s) committed by Spanairds upon the Native Americans--NOT THROUGH SICKNESS--but slavery, murder, torture, and other grotesqueries:

"In September 1510, a group of Dominican friars arrived in Santo Domingo led by Pedro de Córdoba; appalled by the injustices they saw committed by the slaveowners against the Indians, they decided to deny slave owners the right to confession. Las Casas was among those denied confession for this reason.[15] In December 1511, a Dominican preacher Fray Antonio de Montesinos preached a fiery sermon that implicated the colonists in the genocide of the native peoples. He is said to have preached, "Tell me by what right of justice do you hold these Indians in such a cruel and horrible servitude? On what authority have you waged such detestable wars against these people who dealt quietly and peacefully on their own lands? Wars in which you have destroyed such an infinite number of them by homicides and slaughters never heard of before. Why do you keep them so oppressed and exhausted, without giving them enough to eat or curing them of the sicknesses they incur from the excessive labor you give them, and they die, or rather you kill them, in order to extract and acquire gold every day."

^

The evidence of the Europeans' genocide of the Native Americans' is there, written by the men themselves. Columbus arrived in Taino Native Carribean region with Spanairds in tow in 1492. This priest, Fray Antonio de Montesinos, censured the Spanairds for their genocide only 18 years later. The other Spanaird priest, Bartolome Des Casa, was ALSO alive and in the Carribean when he recorded the same thing.:dead:
 
Last edited:

AntiVenom

Bedwench & Armchair Militant Killer
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,633
Reputation
-180
Daps
2,932
Reppin
NULL
Great analogy. Wenches are indeed "trojan horses". They look like friends but are truly enemies who mean to throw your people to the dogs. What happened to Troy?



You speak nothing but the truth here. This is my reward. I admit my mistake.

Im glad the trojan horse comment wasnt lost on you. They pretty much exist to pave the way for the enemy to wipe us the fukk out. Theyre actually worse than white supremacists because they have the perfect camouflage. Its much more difficult to see the threat that they pose to us because they share the same skin color. But many black men are starting to see them for the snakes that they are. And people like azaelia banks make it easier and easier. In a few years the phrase "bedwench" will be a household term and I cant wait. :myman:



lmao nikkas salty as shyt

who wouldnt be if they saw someone that they supported turn around and join a racist propaganda campaign against them? This is normal. But I guess black men are supposed to just accept anything and let any attack ride.:scust:

Know your enemy black man.

"She" just basically admitted to being a troll bruh. I think that a lot of the posters claiming to be female are trolls actually.

Any of the female members are guilty until proven innocent as far as im concerned. Ask elle driver :lolbron:
 

d'jarbargel

Rookie
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Messages
76
Reputation
-90
Daps
45
I mentioned a variety of groups, including the Natives, which you chose to ignore as though I hadn't mentioned them but I digress: there are no pure race Maoris left. The race is destroyed. Before the whites, Maoris were about the only type of people in that region.



^
The above are all genetically same type of people, Maoris. Even with intratribal squabbles--which happened everywhere, including Europe--the Maoris thrived as people in this region before the Europeans came. Since the European's arrirval and subsequent genocide, all of these people are dead BECAUSE of the Europeans. It is no coincidence the Natives, Australian Aborigines, etc have the same history and fate with respects to Europeans. That these race's death coincides with the European's arrival and warmongering implies that the Europeans are the cause.






You must be a cac. I repeat: Even with intratribal squabbles--which happened everywhere, including Europe--the Maoris thrived as people in this region before the Europeans came. Since the European's arrirval and subsequent genocide, all of these people are dead BECAUSE of the Europeans. It is no coincidence the Natives, Australian Aborigines, etc have the same history and fate with respects to Europeans. That these race's death coincides with the European's arrival and warmongering implies that the Europeans are the cause. So yes, cacs are the oppressor. The oppressors of Natives, Aborigines, Maoris, blacks, etc.




Another bout of nonsense. Native American tribes did indeed sacrifice their neighbours and fight wars. They did this for a thousands of years hitherto the Spanairds, and yet the Native Americans teemed in tremendous numbers across the Americas in spite of their squabbles. The only time things changed was when the Spanairds arrived--like when the other cacs arrived in the Pacific and in Australia, damning the Australian Aborigines and Maoris--and imposed their mengerie of grotesquery including slavery, murder, rape, burning, etc against the Native Americans. So again, evidence points to the notion peoples die when Europeans arirve and impose their genocidal practices. Before then all of the Natives, Maoris, Aborigines, etc all THRIVED in their respective regions. Ironically the Spanairds likely used the same arguments you are using now to sway the Native tribes against the Aztecs. The same arguments which we now know were wrong and led to the Native's extinction. So, the Natives' sacrifices were not "worse" than the Spanairds' killing. The Natives had had the same intertribal conflict since inception and thrived. It was the Spanairds' that deaded them, not the Aztec's.




But the Spanairds did kill millions of Indians over hundreds of years (not all at one time). The Taino genocide in the Carribean--where I am from--gives glimpses into how they carried the deed out. The Spanairds singlehandedly wiped out entire Native peoples, not necessarily with military prowess, but military efficiency. Sickness was only recorded in the Taino region in 1518 by which time a Spanaird priest present during Columbus' voyage, Bartolome de Las Casas, writes the majority of the recorded Taino population was already dead. As the Bartolome de Las Casas (1518) indicates, the Natives were but naked men with spears. The Spanairds, meanwhile, were armored, educated and carried with them more advanced weapons, including war dogs. In places like the Carribean, which is only a small island, the Spanairds could plead and manipulate to great effect. Batholome de Las Casas, who settled in the Taino Carribean region in 1502, writes about the terrible genocide through murder--NOT SICKNESS-- as follows:

The Taino genocide
Fri 20 Sep 2013 by abagond



The Taino genocide (1492-1518) is where the Spanish wiped out most of the Tainos (Arawaks), the native people of the northern Caribbean (present-day Cuba, Jamaica, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Bahamas, etc). Columbus himself set it in motion and oversaw it till 1500.

According to one estimate, genocide and disease wiped out 3 million of the 3.5 million Tainos – 85%. Most were already dead when smallpox arrived in 1518.

Columbus noticed two things about the Tainos:

  1. They wore gold jewellery.
  2. Their most advanced weapon was the spear.
Columbus:

With 50 men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

Columbus made La Taina, the land of the Tainos, into a living hell. It went way beyond simply killing those who fought Spanish rule. The Spanish had the Tainos:

  • grilled,
  • cut up into pieces like sheep,
  • run down by hunting dogs and torn to pieces,
  • strung up and burned alive 13 at a time – in memory of Jesus and his 12 Apostles.


They killed even women and children. Even babies: the Spanish threw babies against rocks and into rivers – and laughed. They cut off pieces of Tainos for entertainment. They cut off their heads for practice. They raped women and girls – and brought back syphilis to Europe. They even raped the wife of a king.

The Spanish were kinder to their animals than to the Tainos.

If a Taino killed a Spaniard, the Spanish killed 100 Tainos in return.

They killed Tainos by the thousands, even those who brought them food and gifts. They killed half the people of the kingdom of Maguana outright.



After the killing fields, the Spanish divided the remaining Tainos among themselves to teach them the Christian faith:

  • For Taino men that meant working in the mines, often being worked to death. As many as 90% died within in three months.
  • For Taino women that meant working the land, even the heavy work that men used to do.
There was so little food that babies died for lack of milk. Children died of hunger by the thousands. Men were worked so hard in the mines that few children were born.

Columbus demanded a certain amount gold or cotton from each Taino over the age of 13. Those who failed to meet his demands had their hands cut off.

All this was shocking behaviour by Western standards of the time.

When there were no longer enough Taino workers left, the Spanish brought inAfrican slaves to take their place.

It was such a hell on earth that:

  • Mothers killed their babies.
  • Mass suicides were common.
Many fled to the mountains, blacks too, fighting the Spanish from there.

Hatuey, one of the Taino kings of Cuba, told his people to throw their gold into the river: the Christians worshipped gold as their god and would kill them for it.

In 1512 when Hatuey was about to be burned at the stake (pictured), a Franciscan brother told him him about the Christian faith to save his soul. When Hatuey found out that most good Christians were going to Heaven, he chose Hell.

Source: Mainly “A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies” (1542) by Bartolome de Las Casas.














The Europeans were known racist and hypocrites. If killing Christians was forbidden, then how to explain all the Spanaird and English wars, skirmishes, etc which happened over hundreds of years? The Spanairds themselves recited words from the scripture as they carried out attacks on innocent Native groups.

idk if you can read your own sources, but they say that natives were killed primarily by disease. I guess the idea is to post so much shyt that it's too difficult to rebut. I hope that strategy works out for you but I ain't buying it.

big picture, so you're saying you have a huge chip on your shoulder about being Taino, and you hate all the, (for example) Polish people in the world because in your mind European is European and some of them did bad things once.

i have a solution to that one ! stop pretending to be Taino
 
Top