Stinky Diver
attitude as bad as his odor
CP3 on New Orleans is some of the finest PG play you'll ever witness.
CP3 would body Stockton.
Honestly Kidd & Mcdyess>>>>
But Dice had the emotional maturity of a 5 yr old.Left Phoenix/J Kidd...which was a top notch franchise at the time
To go play with the no pg having/lottery bound Nuggets.
To answer the question....Paul/Blake>>>>>Kidd/Martin
Martin being the weakest player.
In fact, I don't even acknowledge those Nets teams.The East was so terrible then.Team would've been an early playoff exit in the West.Never would've made it past the 2nd round.
Defense, rebounding and running an offense. I don't recall anyone ever accusing Kidd of over dribbling and making an offense stagnant.
CP3 is the better PG overall but he's not better than Kidd in every aspect of the game.
i didnt say i would build my team around kmart.
in other words, if i had a stacked squad like these 2016 clippers, i'd roll with kmart over blake.
now if i had a lottery team and i had to choose between the two, its definitely blake.
i understand the confusion tho. now i see what that @Malta cat was clowning about.
Westbrook, Curry, CP, Irving, Lillard - there's other names who I would take over Kidd today too.
ure:
In one word, yes. But it isn't as simple as that. A prime Kidd was a horrible shooter and crippled the efficiency of the offenses he led. I can't possibly have him ahead of a good playmaker who's also one of the best 3-pt shooters in the league. You wouldn't think I'm non compos mentis if Kidd played in the West for his entire career.Nobody read this?
Damian fukking Lillard is a better player than prime Jason Kidd?
Considering they went to back to back Finals and Blake and CP couldn't even get out of the second round with a 3-1 lead clearly they had better results.
But I was just talking about better chemistry in the way their games fit together. Chris Paul may be the best point guard in the league but it's probably not the best fit to get the most out of Blake. If Blake had Jason Kidd as his PG it'd be![]()
In one word, yes. But it isn't as simple as that. A prime Kidd was a horrible shooter and crippled the efficiency of the offenses he led. I can't possibly have him ahead of a good playmaker who's also one of the best 3-pt shooters in the league. You wouldn't think I'm non compos mentis if Kidd played in the West for his entire career.
Well let's see
Paul > Kidd
Blake > Kenyon
![]()
Neither Kidd or Antonio McDyess were in their primes. They did not do anything besides lose in the first round
Y'all nikkaz say weird shyt thinking its smart.

I too joke a lot about that, but isn't as straight forward as "Lillard can't play defense". You've got to factor in team schemes, who was guarding the PG on each possession they scored and most importantly if you to weigh into account that the PG position is at its apex - it only makes sense the scoring differentials look like this (from when Kidd was in NJ):Damian Lillard isn't efficient either and he can't play defense. Kidd was one of the best defensive PG ever while Damian Had every opposing point guard droppin 40 on him.
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/damian-lillard-has-been-getting-owned-a-lot-this-year.308874/
McDyess was so much better than K Mart, didn't matter if they we're in their prime or not.
nikkaz sound unintelligent trying to make Kenyon Martin out to be some kind of great player.
I think Blake is overrated, to.
Mcdyess could do all this shyt Blake does, but he was much better on defense.
So when I mentioned Kidd/Mcdyess, i did so in an "ideal sense".I really had Kidd/Martin in mind by comparison.
Plus I'm a Suns fan![]()
That's because that figure in your mind dressed up as the truth, is actually made out of nostalgia and antediluvian.