offesnively they were terrible larry brown game plan every night was let AI shot 30 shots and hope that the great defense was enough. while curry's team has eleite two way players
AI>chef curry
Snow<klay (i know eric was the PG but for the sake of the argument im matching him up against klay)
lynch<barnes
tyrone hill <dray green
old ass mutombo=bum ass bogut
mckie<iggy
bell<livinginston
curry has had MUCH more help than AI of course he shoots a great percentage put any ATG with the warriors roster and they shoot at or above 50%
Who are these elite two way players on the Warriors roster? There are literally two above average offensive players on the Warriors roster. You can't be a stacked offense when Draymond Green, Harrison Barnes and Andre Iguodala - all players who consistently get wide and rely upon others to create offense for them - are in the conversation for the third best offensive contributor. It really kills me when people on here swear Dray is overpaid & overrated or that Iggy is the worst finals MVP of all time, and then turn back and say these guys contribute to stacked offense in an effort to detract from Curry. Thats bullshyt, this team would be among the worst offenses in the league without the one guy who can create for himself and others at a high level consistently. Don't tell me Klay Thompson is good enough to lead this offense anywhere without Steph, they'd fall apart.
Where the Warriors are actually stacked? Defensively. Thats where their role players largely specialize. Curry carries an immense influence for them on the other end of the floor (greater than Iverson has ever contributed in this league), especially in the postseason where he's by far their most consistent and reliable contributor.
Being able to thrive under immense defensive pressure is a requirement for being an offensive superstar in this league. Anyone who thinks Curry couldn't thrive under the same circumstances flat out doesn't consider him a superstar, which is retarded. I'm sitting here like
when people tell me a dude that's the best shooter in NBA history with NBA street handles who can also finish inside & pass won't thrive regardless of supporting cast. What about that skillset leads you to believe he couldn't? If anything he'd put up even greater volume numbers that you guys would respect more. I'm not giving Iverson a handicap for being in that situation when he was at his best as a ball dominant creator with absolute control over an offense. The very player you guys idolize wouldn't even exist if he played a different way, and he sure as hell wouldn't be a good fit with the Warriors who emphasize ball movement and heavily rely upon the 4on3 situations Curry routinely creates in the P&R 24 feet away from the basket.Unless you're seriously trying to say Klay Thompson and a bunch of role players are the solution for Iverson shooting 50% from the field, its completely false that he'd suddenly turn into something that he's never been in his career. That's not how things work, lets not use the supporting cast as an excuse or elevate the Warriors help in an effort to glorify Iverson while taking away from Curry's impact.
@ "One good season"
