Who cares about accolades when discussing who the "better" player is? That's only relevant when determining who the "greater" player is.
Magic, like Bill Russell, is a player who probably ranks top five when discussing the "greatest" players of all time. He's one of the most decorated athletes in the sports history.
But just as is the case with Bill Russell, there are a whole lot of other players who were "better" players than Magic and KD is definitely one of them.
KD is (going to be) in that discussion as to whether or not he's a better player than LeBron--a player who by comparison not only negates Magic's playmaking ability, but also provides better scoring and defense. So I don't see how anyone can't see that KD is the better player when Magic is essentially LeBron stripped of his scoring and defensive abilities.
And if KD played in that Western Conference that Magic played in during his 80s run then he'd definitely have the same accolades as Magic.
Magic, like Bill Russell, is a player who probably ranks top five when discussing the "greatest" players of all time. He's one of the most decorated athletes in the sports history.
But just as is the case with Bill Russell, there are a whole lot of other players who were "better" players than Magic and KD is definitely one of them.
KD is (going to be) in that discussion as to whether or not he's a better player than LeBron--a player who by comparison not only negates Magic's playmaking ability, but also provides better scoring and defense. So I don't see how anyone can't see that KD is the better player when Magic is essentially LeBron stripped of his scoring and defensive abilities.
And if KD played in that Western Conference that Magic played in during his 80s run then he'd definitely have the same accolades as Magic.


