Bill Burr is a real one. He called the Rittenhouse situation LAST YEAR

[Wildhundreds]

Maybe.. but something tells me this kid had his sights set on ‘others’ before he went too far and killed those people.

You know he did. 10000000% he did. And you actually had black people up there with guns in unison with white gun carriers too.. White people just got in the way in Kenosha. This could've been real ugly if the white people stayed home..

 

[You Win Perfect]

this type of situation been going on since white people been racists (which is forever). So no he didn’t call nothin. Y’all can’t wait to give a white boy props for something

 

[ViShawn]

Rittenhouse claimed that he was there to protect his friend's business, prevent vandalism, and provide aid.

Kenosha was set ablaze during the riots so I guess if you're a small business owner you didn't want that shyt to happen.

Some folks ask why was he there. That's not a question under legal premise. People do dumb shyt all the time. At 17 I would have been at home playing video games, but you also have people going to rallies for other causes. I even know Black folks that march here in full body armor, rifles and all. Not my style but hey if we start asking a white boy "What were you doing there?" you know our Black asses will get it tenfold.

 

[Antwon Mitchell]

Him being there doesn't automatically make him guilty. Because YOU or I believe he shouldn't be there doesn't make him guilty. Liberals like to use the "but he was carrying a gun" argument so that makes him guilty because they hate guns (except for when their personal security has them).

The jury is going to have to decide at the time of the shooting did Killahouse have a legitimate self-defense claim.
So many people with dumb take on this case based on emotions and personal bias.

Nothing you said makes any sense especially the bolded and just comes across as making MAGA-Esque defending of Rittenhouse.

Making this case sound like some hidden “evil anti-gun” liberal agenda is just crazy MAGA babble/illness. This has nothing to do with politics but the fact he shot 3 ppl, killing two of them while injuring the other and whether or not justice will be served.

Some of y'all falling off the wheels...maybe it's time to take a little break with the politic obsession and cleanse your mind...

 

[Billy Ocean]

Him being there doesn't automatically make him guilty. Because YOU or I believe he shouldn't be there doesn't make him guilty. Liberals like to use the "but he was carrying a gun" argument so that makes him guilty because they hate guns (except for when their personal security has them).

The jury is going to have to decide at the time of the shooting did Killahouse have a legitimate self defense claim.
So many people with dumb takes on this case based off emotions and personal bias.

Good Lord this MAGA p*ssy roams around here with this cac bullshyt with impunity everyday

 

[Trust Me]

Rittenhouse claimed that he was there to protect his friend's business, prevent vandalism, and provide aid.

Kenosha was set ablaze during the riots so I guess if you're a small business owner you didn't want that shyt to happen.

Some folks ask why was he there. That's not a question under legal premise. People do dumb shyt all the time. At 17 I would have been at home playing video games, but you also have people going to rallies for other causes. I even know Black folks that march here in full body armor, rifles and all. Not my style but hey if we start asking a white boy "What were you doing there?" you know our Black asses will get it tenfold.

Why he was there goes along with ‘intent’


The hell are you takin about?

And they got the police to help keep things under control.


If they would’ve gone to HIS property, and tried to loot HIS things.. and threatened him and HIS family.. then he’d have the right to protect himself and his family.


None of that was the case here.

 

[ViShawn]

Why he was there goes along with ‘intent’


The hell are you takin about?

And they got the police to help keep things under control.


If they would’ve gone to HIS property, and tried to loot HIS things.. and threatened him and HIS family.. then he’d have the right to protect himself and his family.


None of that was the case here.

The police didn't do anything. They just watched the city set ablaze unless they were instructed to intervene. LEO isn't legally obligated under Supreme Court hearings to protect us as individuals or our property. "To Protect & Serve" is a farce.

From what he said he was asked to protect his friend's business. Like I said I wouldn't have been there but hey not illegal. The court will have to decide if it was self defense or murder.

Judge Joe Brown, since this thread is quoting people, asked if they are charging and asking Kyle his intent then why didn't they ask the protestors he shot.



Again, people can protest, counter protest all they want. It is protected under our Constitution. He had ties to the community there.

 

[Trust Me]

The police didn't do anything. They just watched the city set ablaze unless they were instructed to intervene. LEO isn't legally obligated under Supreme Court hearings to protect us as individuals or our property. "To Protect & Serve" is a farce.

From what he said he was asked to protect his friend's business. Like I said I wouldn't have been there but hey not illegal. The court will have to decide if it was self defense or murder.

Judge Joe Brown, since this thread is quoting people, asked if they are charging and asking Kyle his intent then why didn't they ask the protestors he shot.



Again, people can protest, counter protest all they want. It is protected under our Constitution. He had ties to the community there.

As far as I know, vigilantism isn’t legal. So he’s guilty off rip. That’s exactly what he tried to be.


On top of that, he was nowhere near his friends ‘business’ when he popped them dudes.


On top of that, dude ran right to the cops afterward and got all buddy buddy with them. Knowing damn well he was gonna need them on his side.


You’re being obtuse.


You can’t inject yourself into a hectic situation, only to kill people because you felt ‘in harms way’


You put yourself in that situation. No one else.


Like I said. Open and shut in any other court room. This judge is on some other shyt.

 

[ViShawn]

As far as I know, vigilantism isn’t legal. So he’s guilty off rip. That’s exactly what he tried to be.


On top of that, he was nowhere near his friends ‘business’ when he popped them dudes.


On top of that, dude ran right to the cops afterward and got all buddy buddy with them. Knowing damn well he was gonna need them on his side.


You’re being obtuse.


You can’t I next yourself into a hectic situation, only to kill people because you felt ‘in harms way’


You put yourself in that situation. No one else.


Like I said. Open and shut in any other court room. This judge is on some other shyt.

Check out the break down. I made a post about it on here.

 

[killacal]

Rittenhouse claimed that he was there to protect his friend's business, prevent vandalism, and provide aid.

Kenosha was set ablaze during the riots so I guess if you're a small business owner you didn't want that shyt to happen.

Some folks ask why was he there. That's not a question under legal premise. People do dumb shyt all the time. At 17 I would have been at home playing video games, but you also have people going to rallies for other causes. I even know Black folks that march here in full body armor, rifles and all. Not my style but hey if we start asking a white boy "What were you doing there?" you know our Black asses will get it tenfold.

Crossing state lines with an assult rifle with the intent of playing Batman is boys will be boys huh

Cacs always break characters in these threads trying to tow the line between what's in their white hearts and their online characters black skin

 

[saturn7]

Why do you post on this forum? It’s one thing to bring up debate. It’s another thing to try and act educated, and troll. I’ve been a paralegal for over 15 years. This case is open and shut as they come. But with that judge, it’s a whole new ballgame.


When.. not if.. but WHEN he gets let off the hook.. best believe them cacs are gonna be like ‘oh, Kyle got away with shooting whites? I BET we can mow down them negroes and they won’t do shyt to us’


Be ready for it. But something tells me you’re white.. so you really don’t have to worry about it.

Clearly this is not open and shut. Or else the jury would've announced a verdict yesterday.
If the jury believes he was legally defending himself at the time the shooting took place by law he is not guilty.
Again clouded by emotion.

I'm not defending dude. I'm just stating this is what the jury has to look at and make their decision on.
People adding extra shyt because they don't like him. I don't like him either but that doesn't change the fact that the jury is going to decide if he unlawfully shot those people.

 

[ViShawn]

Crossing state lines with an assult rifle with the intent of playing Batman is boys will be boys huh

Cacs always break characters in these threads trying to tow the line between what's in their white hearts and their online characters black skin

I'm not a cac. There's members that know me in person and I've posted my own firearm group on here.

He didn't cross state lines with a gun. It was supplied by his friend.

I wouldn't have been there because I'm not about that protest life. I've been asked to do armed protests in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Mind you I'm in Texas. Just not for me.

Clearly this is not open and shut. Or else the jury would've announced a verdict yesterday.
If the jury believes he was legally defending himself at the time the shooting took place by law he is not guilty.
Again clouded by emotion.

I'm not defending dude. I'm just stating this is what the jury has to look at and make their decision on.
People adding extra shyt because they don't like him. I don't like him either but that doesn't change the fact that the jury is going to decide if he unlawfully shot those people.

I don't like what he represents for the right but he should have due process and a right to a fair trial. Doesn't make you a cac for wanting that lol.

 

[George's Dilemma]

He should have never been there, but if that isn't taken into consideration legally, he's likely going to walk on all charges with the exception of being underage and having a firearm. The irony of that last charge, his defense attorneys said he shouldn't be convicted on that count because of hunting laws.

 

[saturn7]

Crossing state lines with an assult rifle with the intent of playing Batman is boys will be boys huh

Cacs always break characters in these threads trying to tow the line between what's in their white hearts and their online characters black skin

The rifle was already in Wisconsin at his friends step-dads house.
People going off media misinformation instead of the facts presented during the course of the trial.
Criticize this guy all day but do it with correct info.

 

[Trust Me]

Clearly this is not open and shut. Or else the jury would've announced a verdict yesterday.
If the jury believes he was legally defending himself at the time the shooting took place by law he is not guilty.
Again clouded by emotion.

I'm not defending dude. I'm just stating this is what the jury has to look at and make their decision on.
People adding extra shyt because they don't like him. I don't like him either but that doesn't change the fact that the jury is going to decide if he unlawfully shot those people.

The second you or anyone else injects yourself in these types of situations.. fully armed, WITH intent.. (remember.. he said he was armed to ‘protect’ his friends business.. that he was nowhere near) .. then you suffer the consequences. Period.


Miss me with the ‘emotional’ shyt too. I been doing this for far too long to ever be emotional about any case. And if you don’t think those jurors are getting outside pressure by this judge.. in some way, then you’re delusional. I’ve seen it ALL.




ALL.