http://espn.go.com/blog/nba/post/_/id/3730/bill-laimbeer-would-no-question-take-lebron-over-jordan
He said he more versatile and Jordan couldn't take this team to the Finals.

Ill go ahead and let yall steam as we hear more basketball people come out and say LeBron is better
and Bill would be an idiot by saying such things. now aside from the obvious..what other player wouldnt want to play with a guy who loves to pass but is also a deadly scorer which means you mr role guy will be WIDE OPEN? that goes without saying.prime kobe/mike are better than LBJ. but i'll take LBJ as my teammate over them if i want to get more touches. now if i want to win more often in any era no matter how stiff the comp may be in the toughest conference(not always the weak east). then give me kobe or mike.
but if i just wanna have fun outchea while i also win a ring or two. its LBJ all day.
but he just said mike couldnt do those other things? Do you need me to pull up the stats?
What did kobe due vs boston when his shot wasnt falling? Out rebounded everyone on both teams. thats all he did. you know. do what ya gotta do to win the game. you know... what winners do.
Mike has done the same. mike has averaged a very high number of assists because they had no point forward/nor a pg at the time that was reliable. so he did it. dont be confused by what guys dont do everyday by what they cant do if need be.
i've seen mike grab 15 boards when he needed to. i've seen kobe dish out 10 assists when he needed to.
the idea that LBJ is some triple threat that these guys are not is a fallacy. LBJ is bigger, he's the size of a Power forward, he better grab 10 boards per. thats not the job of a 6'6 guard.