Bill Simmons says he'll take Nash ahead of Iverson

FlyRy

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
31,876
Reputation
3,685
Daps
65,489
If it's nowadays you take Nash

In 96 you take Iverson
which is the whole point of the "re-draftables" yet a certain poster mad that nash eliminated kobe 2 years in a row and won MVPs keeps misunderstanding that, while ignoring the embarassing last few years of iverson's career on detroit and the grizz and the sympathy sixers.
 

Suleiman Bey

Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
5,610
Reputation
-4,595
Daps
11,190
Iverson pioneered the pin downs the Iverson Cut as it’s known in modern offensive playbooks...


I wonder what circumstances it would take to make Iverson win. I think he needs to play with a guy like LeBron.

Does Iverson on the ‘07 Cavs with young LeBron knock off the Spurs? :patrice:

How AI gonna play with Bron when they both ball hogs?
 

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,431
Reputation
6,336
Daps
140,290
No you’re just a cac that can’t face the truth. The post you quoted is all facts. What part am I making up? You wanna talk basketball than talk it. What systems outside of MDA did Nash play like a superstar player in? What legitimate reason is there for Nash to take so long take off? Why did he lose a starting battle to Robert Pack? I’m not trying to hard I’m laying facts down. AI accomplished more
with less, played elite ball longer than Nash and did it on many teams.

The thread was about Bill Simmons DRAFTING Nash instead of AI....YOU have NO legit case for saying you’d draft a guy who wasn’t an all star until 27 and wasn’t elite until 30 over a guy who was 23.5/7.5 his rookie year and got to the finals in his 5th season.

Don’t get mad cuz I’m calling out cacs/lames/whoever....that’s what you cornballs do to deflect from the fact you’re exposing yourselves.....draft a “late bloomer” who couldn’t start over Robert Pack im his 4th season over AI brehs....
@bold: wow, all this over disagreeing over a simple basketball debate

Take your sensitive fakkit ass on somewhere bytch if you cant handle a sports discussion.:camby:

its been established and you been given your answers why. The nikka was not given the opportunities, but when he had them he showed out hence him having AS appearances and all nba ones before his second Suns tenure.

Your ole overcompensating militant ass just can't accept facts. So this part of the discussion will not end, because you can't admit your arguments are thin and hold no weight.:aicmon:

Ans AI didnt accomplish more, their accomplishments are about the same altho Nash is more consistent. So, if anything he has the edge.
 
Last edited:

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,095
Reputation
4,850
Daps
64,234
@Long Live The Kane



What is retroactive here? Iverson wasn't universally considered better than Nash in "real time". Who am I elevating Nash over who was considered better in "real time"? If we were talking about Kobe or Wade or Duncan or Dirk I'd get it. But Iverson? Not on that level.

Aww word? Yeah aiight, so I'm gonna have to end our conversation here because apparently you lived in an alternate reality... You're gone even further than Simmons and Rusillo who spent the first 20 minutes or so of the podcast prefacing how they know it wasn't conventional wisdom that Nash was a better player than Ivo and making arguments why people should consider he was...the NBA media has done to AI what they did to Melo where they've consistently taken shots at him in his post-prime to lower his stature...guess this is that next step where we pretend they were never considered among the best in the game in the first place...

but yeah you got it man, Nash has always been considered better than Iverson and we've always been at war with Eastasia

:hubie:

Not even sure how this random accepted fact even spawned 400 replies
 
Last edited:

Consumed

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
5,990
Reputation
1,400
Daps
16,122
Aww word? Yeah aiight, so I'm gonna have to end our conversation here because apparently you lived in an alternate reality... You're gone even further than Simmons and Rusillo who spent the first 20 minutes or so of the podcast prefacing how they know it wasn't conventional wisdom that Nash was a better player than Ivo and making arguments why people should consider he was...the NBA media has done to AI what they did to Melo where they've consistently taken shots at him in his post-prime to lower his stature...guess this is that next step where we pretend they were never considered among the best in the game in the first place...

but yeah you got it man, Nash has always been considered better than Iverson and we've always been at war with Eastasia

:hubie:

Not even sure how this random accepted fact even spawned 400 replies

I still don't know when it was conventional wisdom that Iverson was better than Nash. Simmons and Russillo overstate how many people would pick Iverson over Nash in the interest of building a balanced offense where everyone eats and Nash fitting the profile of a "traditional PG" that many obsess over. I'm not going off what they're saying at all and not framing my arguments around their logic.

What do you think Allen Iverson's rightful stature is as a player all time away from media bias? How about as a shooting guard or point guard, whatever you think he's at. Same with Carmelo at SF. Do you think they're being shortchanged because of media perception or maybe it has to do with legitimate criticism with careers and concerns about their fit on great teams.

Interesting that you mention Carmelo who can also be overrated by the casual audience. There was a time people thought he was a better scorer than Durant because of versatility (ignoring the huge difference in slashing). That's been a joke. Media didn't make him struggle with shooting consistency in the postseason because his game was so reliant on contested shot making and the media didn't make him a limited passer. He had real flaws that prevented him from being better as a player, though he was still very talented. You can criticize both these guys against common belief without underrating or disrespecting anyone.
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,095
Reputation
4,850
Daps
64,234


:leon:

Crazy that this is literally the first time I've seen Marion get his flowers like this, legit shocked they picked him over Ginobili and gave him his props for his defense and him being a championship piece on Mavs team that beat the Heatles
 

Hyman Roth

Pro
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
505
Reputation
90
Daps
1,107
which is the whole point of the "re-draftables" yet a certain poster mad that nash eliminated kobe 2 years in a row and won MVPs keeps misunderstanding that, while ignoring the embarassing last few years of iverson's career on detroit and the grizz and the sympathy sixers.

100% but logic, common sense and rationality left this thread pages ago.
 

Bigblackted4

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
25,648
Reputation
2,049
Daps
43,745
Reppin
Eastcleveland
Iverson pioneered the pin downs the Iverson Cut as it’s known in modern offensive playbooks...


I wonder what circumstances it would take to make Iverson win. I think he needs to play with a guy like LeBron.

Does Iverson on the ‘07 Cavs with young LeBron knock off the Spurs? :patrice:

He’d need Shaq, Duncan, Hakeem, he needs that’d dominate big that doesn’t need touches like a wing.
 

hayesc0

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,507
Reputation
8,343
Daps
118,850
It should be interesting if people keep the same energy about efficiency when LeBron debates come up.
 

Gil Scott-Heroin

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,231
Daps
241,462
He absolutely could . You nitpicking his FG percentage that little nikka faced triple teams that's why it's lower than Nash's. AI was a 30ppg player in his prime. Don't play semantics bruh. AI was completely superior on offense than Nash. It's not even a discussion
Look at this cracka.

:picard:
 
Top