Binary rating system > Decimal rating system

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,672
Reputation
4,087
Daps
103,967
I have awoken to what, I believe, is like the 50th "Post up your dimes!!!, you hatin ass nikkas" thread. :beli:

I'm here to tell you it's not that serious. Really.

Nitpicking over silly things like, "OMG, hair is worth 2 points, ass is 3 in my scale!!!" (:what:) sounds absolutely ridiculous and you know it.



The only 'scale' you need is 0 and 1. Honest truth.
 

aXiom

Maximized Potential
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
11,666
Reputation
8,526
Daps
69,814
Reppin
Parc fermé
nah, the decimal system is best for looks... a girl can be a 7, 8.5, 9, 9.5 etc... face to ass to titties to frame to complexion etc... they're way too many variables to be limited to just yay or nay.

a binary system only works for whether a chick is fukkable or not, like an off/on switch... like there are some chicks you'd like to fukk, while there may be some you'd fukk if filled with enough liquor so they're still 1, everything else is 0.
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,672
Reputation
4,087
Daps
103,967
nah, the decimal system is best for looks... a girl can be a 7, 8.5, 9, 9.5 etc... face to ass to titties to frame to complexion etc... they're way too many variables to be limited to just yay or nay.

a binary system only works for whether a chick is fukkable or not, like an off/on switch... like there are some chicks you'd like to fukk while there may be some you'd fukk if filled with enough liquor so they're still 1, everything else is 0.

:aicmon:

Why not just use a 100 point scale then?
 

SuburbanPimp

Giving game to lames since the 90s
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
13,380
Reputation
1,417
Daps
35,735
Reppin
In Dallas, From Cleveland
I agree... When I was young it was fukkable and non fukkable

I might dig a little deeper if chosing a girlfriend or not but all that nitpicking is lame
 
Top