CongratsNot sure what the true definition of tether is because I don’t suck Tariq’s dikk but my direct ancestors were slaves in America
CongratsNot sure what the true definition of tether is because I don’t suck Tariq’s dikk but my direct ancestors were slaves in America
I was with you for pushing back on cats in here but fuçk allat you deserve them redsnah, im almost in the red because I made a thread about how I hated Nas and a bunch of new yorkers got in their feelings and mass negged me.![]()
Just cus we passed the era dont mean shyt changed.That's old news. We were well past the crack era when gentrification of the cities started.
Again, a pincer formation. Bill Clinton's empowerment zones (1994) started eroding what was left of black business. Obama's poorly executed TARP eroded what was left: home ownership. Once a community is tripped of its economic base, it's a dead man walking.
I was with you for pushing back on cats in here but fuçk allat you deserve them reds![]()
1. Your game aint up to par, you don't know shyt about the North/South split nor none of the polictiking going on. You from New York, a completely different culture and get down.You don't know about the CDC Shoe riots or about how northern mexicans and blacks got busy against the southern mexicans. How that led to a long standing alliance and shyt up north that continues to this day.
Don't know what you're babbling about.You’re a c00n that masquerades as a militant , should you be throwing rocks from a pile of shyt?
Stop arguing just to argue. I'm telling you that they updated the game.This aint fantasy land where if a practice that was prevailant in the past, it stayed in the past.This shyt still going to go like buisness as usual.
and guess who caused all of that shytI don't care about none of that shyt. This is what I care about.
▛ Black Californians are overrepresented in the homeless population. Twenty percent of homeless adults identify Black as their sole racial identity and 6% as one of their identities. Thus, 26% identify Black as, compared to 7% in the overall California population.
▛ A higher proportion of Black Californians experiencing homelessness are cis-gender men, compared to other racial groups. Three quarters of Black Californians are cis-gender men, compared to 64% of white Californians and 68% of those from other racial groups.
▛ Black individuals reported a lower lifetime prevalence of regular substance use than those from other racial groups experiencing homelessness. Over half (58%) reported using illicit drugs regularly at some point in their lifetime; 74% of white and 65% of those from other races did so.
▛ Black individuals had a higher prevalence of severe mental health symptoms and problems than members of other racial groups. They had a higher prevalence of hallucinations, suicide attempts, and mental health hospitalizations.
▛ More than three quarters (79%) of Black Californians experiencing homelessness entered homelessness from housing. Nearly half (46%) entered from a non-leaseholding housing situation, living without the legal protections of a lease agreement. One in three (33%) were leaseholders in their last housing.
▛ Black Californians had extremely low incomes prior to homelessness. Among those who entered from a leaseholding arrangement, the median monthly household income in the six months prior to homelessness was $1200, lower than incomes from other racial groups experiencing homelessness. Among non-leaseholding Black Califorians, the median monthly household income in the same period was $960.
▛ Economic precarity preceded homelessness. Among Black Californians, leaseholders’ median monthly housing costs were $675–more than half of the median monthly household income. While a large proportion of non-leaseholders (45%) didn’t contribute to rent, those who did were cost burdened. Black participants discussed work and income fluctuations impacting their ability to keep up with housing costs.
▛ Anti-Black discrimination disrupted housing stability for Black Californians experiencing homelessness. Some Black participants discussed having left their last housing situation due to discrimination. For others, discrimination disrupted employment, resulting in loss of income and inability to keep up with housing costs.
Thus, straight black men are VASTLY over represented in CA's homeless population, not due to drug use, but due to mental instability caused by economic discrimination.
Anything else?
im well aware the game has been updated and flipped, but old practices still continue on top of all thatStop arguing just to argue. I'm telling you that they updated the game.
You're missing what is clearly obvious to everyone else.
As a NY'er, where the real estate game is laid out in bold, let me explain: it's a pincer formation.
They flood with zone with 'new nikkas', don't really matter who, preferably with as few rights as possible. Upend the labor market by hiring them cheaply en masse (thereby lowering wages overall, broke wp suffer here too). Make them feel special ("they're such hard workers") to increase the divide,- why not? it's free programming- but at the same time, keep them desperate. This is key because it keeps them malleable and open to any suggestion. Market forces do the rest. Prices go up on everything. All of a sudden, no one can afford to live here anymore, gotta go.
Note: this scenario occurs with or without the firebombing. But the firebombing is egregious, you have to at least admit that.
![]()
This useless oaf got two Mexicans in front him repeatedly calling a Black man the N-word and all he does is laugh. I don’t expect him to physically attack them but at the very least check them on some “ayo chill with that word“
![]()
and guess who caused all of that shyt
![]()
Notice the skin tone?![]()
nikkas entire personalities is about being exotic to the negro and white around them cacs. we are dealing with cowards with long rap sheets of cowardly behavior.Breh,
That shyt is CRAZY, I know people who are only 1/4 "Something Else", and that is all they can talk about, SMH
They don't understand the economic aspect to all of this, or they don't care because it does not affect them. I have no clue which one it is. What I do know is that there are plenty of studies on this that objectively makes clear the issues, but they prefer to argue in the subjective so they don't have to face the truth and stay in the narrative of the bubble that they feel comfortable.That's old news. We were well past the crack era when gentrification of the cities started.
Again, a pincer formation. Bill Clinton's empowerment zones (1994) started eroding what was left of black business. Obama's poorly executed TARP eroded what was left: home ownership. Once a community is tripped of its economic base, it's a dead man walking.