Marc Spector
the 4'11 Cuban
I would say your list is accurate. Phoenix is four, Sacramento is five, Seattle is six
Las Vegas has one of the largest black communities in The West, per ACS '23:I heard Las Vegas actually has a pretty sizable Black population outside of the strip.
That's a southern city. I define "The West" as the states beginning with the row (north to south) of: Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico;Tulsa?![]()
The thing with SD is that the shyt people say about LA, actually applies to SD. You don't see black people anywhere near as widespread in SD the way you do in LA; there's a significantly smaller wealth base in Black San Diego; significantly smaller middle class; and so on.San Diego is actually underrated in our Black presence
I'm sure pretty coldHow cold does it get in Aurora? I heard brother go out there and clean up with the white women? The thing about them areas like Denver, Phoenix,San Diego is it seems like regular black men have had some run in with law enforcement . I wouldn’t want to worry about that.
Having never been to Seattle or Portland, but having become acquainted with Denver, how would you compare and contrast the black experience in all 3?I would say your list is accurate. Phoenix is four, Sacramento is five, Seattle is six
I like mixed cities with a nice sized AA presence.
I guess thats one reason I liked Diego.
But out west thats going to be hard to find in the states. But I prefer melting pots or cities with diversity on shyt to do. Cities with exciting and progressive shyt going on. Usually one sided places are boring and repetitive filled with “local celebrity” and arrogance doesn’t matter who the majority is.
I haven’t been there in over 10 years unfortunately, not even in passing.See Daygo doesn't fit my description of nice sized black presence, but I feel the same way, I like racially and ethnically diverse places, but not so hyper diverse that the black population is muted.
I'm gonna come back to this thread later but the latest ACS release (they released 2024 back in Sept/Oct) shows Oakland down to 18.5%. The legacy of blackness is still there and will be there but black people are still leaving in droves.I always consider Oakland a black city
It’s crazy cause this wasn’t the case just 20-25 years ago…at all lolA major difference between the primary black cities of The West and SD, is people know that when they go to LA, The Bay, or Vegas, they will see black culture. Hell, people will argue that Seattle is more culturally black than San Diego, and people know that if they go to Phoenix they will see more black people than in SD.

It’s crazy cause this wasn’t the case just 20-25 years ago…at all lol
Only San Francisco has had more of a drop in Black presence than San Diego, so it’s always difficult trying to explain to people who only know San Diego of the past 10-20 years how dramatic that’s been.
Gatherings like this were normal, you’re definitely not seeing this in 2026…
We had the Gold Coast Classic, an annual HBCU game plus the parade that went thru the neighborhood.
I could go on…
But yeah the last two times I’ve been home (23’ and 25’) I’ve been hard pressed to see too many of us at all, even in Southeast…
![]()
All of this is facts.San Diego is in major trouble. While the black exodus is slowing in LA; black population is still increasing in Sac; SD is in rapid decline like The Bay and is going the way of SF and Oakland.
San Diego at it's population peak was 9.4% black and 104,261 black people, in 1990.
The '24 estimates have the community at 76,416, which is a 26.7% drop in the last 34 years. To be fair, that's still a decent number of black people, but it's declining sharply.
The overall city is down to 5.4% black from 9.4% then, and Southeast, the "black" area of SD, is down to 13.3% black according to these estimates. Also being fair, anything over 10% is a lot in The West, so that would still be considered alot of black people, within the context of our Western cities.
San Francisco gentrified the fukk outta black neighborhoods and pushed us out, from afar it seems like the same thing is happening in SD. And historically The City was much blacker than SD.
SF at peak was 13.4% black (1970). They've been fukking us over in SF since then. As in other places, "Urban renewal" in SF specifically targeted Black SF, coupled with the War On Drugs, redlining, housing and employment discrimination, and all of these things happened simultaneously with a rapidly growing and increasing cost of living.
San Francisco probably experienced the harshest case of gentrification of any city here. It's effects on Black SF have been astounding. I could be wrong, but the only neighborhoods in SF that are even 10% black today, are Bayview-Hunters Point, which is 23.8% black, and Fillmore, which is 10.9% black.
Ain't nowhere else in SF City over 10% black.