Black female atheists...do you exist?

The Electric Lady

Post and toke
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
2,003
Reputation
972
Daps
3,378
Reppin
Htown
so,ladies who adhere to thee tenets of reason/atheism who are some of your favorite philosophers/scientists..?

This post summarizes every thing I find is wrong in the new atheism movement. Atheism has no tenants, and yet people attribute it to 'reason' and giving such a simplistic, non-biased descriptor in 'atheist' an actual reason for being behind it. Atheism has nothing to do with reason. Any claim that it does is a holier-than-thou approach to try and feel superior to others. Have empathy for your fellow man, don't look down upon them. This is why many atheists look bad to others and why I find the cultural of political atheism, as seen on the internet, as a poisonous subculture.

Another quibble is how people assume that because I'm atheist I must be a scientist or am hugely turned on by science; I'm not. Science is merely a tool, like anything else. It can benefit man, it can be a detriment to man. But it's a tool, nonetheless. A lot of people on the internet who likely did not do well in science classes claim SCIENCE fukk YEAH and pretending to be science nerds. Knowledge is power, but please do not conflate scientific knowledge as being 'right'. People give science a bad name by doing so. That being said, I understand the hostility. Some believers are crazy about their anti-science approach, and science is definitely under attack by many fundamentalists. But that is no reason to condone such behavior.

As for philosophy, I find western philosophy dry. It has a lot of words, and the occasional nugget of wisdom, but it's not something that I - as in ME, not anyone else, or everyone in this world - can base my life around. Without a belief in God, there sometimes feels like a sense of emptiness. A lack of place, a lack of ritual, a lack of tradition, a lack of backbone for one's philosophical views and outlooks. For that, I turned to Buddhism. Due to its non-theistic views, I find it very pragmatic and the school that I practice - Soto Zen - fits within the confines of my life. It just makes sense to me, and I can be religious and have a sense of belonging without pretending I believe in God, or worshiping anything or anyone. It's refreshing. In that area, I have a lot of favorite philosophers, but my favorite is still the Shakyamuni Buddha. His philosophy covers everything, from relationships with friends and family, to government and politics and how to to be a good leader within Buddhist laymanship, from honoring ones parents and children, to understanding the inner turmoil that boils under the surface of man. Buddha said not to worship him, he claimed he was not a god, and that everything he had accomplished was from our own possibilities as human beings. I find Buddhism the best form of humanism. Eastern philosophy as a whole suits me more and I learn a lot from all sorts of Eastern faiths and political systems from Buddhism to Taoism to Confucianism.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,989
Daps
641,370
Reppin
The Deep State
everything's conditional,nobody experiences reality exactly the same,and if thee situation is as cut and dry as you make it seem no one would believe in G-d in the first place,we just don't know how to decipher and formulate the data of its "potential" existence..

and i already know what science is cretin,i'm merely stating for example that the mathematical formula used to extrapolate the distance from Earth to the Sun is just as abstract as the presence of Allah or spirits...
did you seriously say the distance to the fukking sun is "abstract?"
 

The Electric Lady

Post and toke
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
2,003
Reputation
972
Daps
3,378
Reppin
Htown
Why?

Should history have been different? :leon:

By this, I think he means people are born atheist and they have their religions and philosophies ingrained through human conditioning. However, such a statement ignores the human tendency to seek out spirituality and meaning.
 

Greenstrings

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,829
Reputation
480
Daps
3,664
By this, I think he means people are born atheist and they have their religions and philosophies ingrained through human conditioning. However, such a statement ignores the human tendency to seek out spirituality and meaning.
True enough to some degree but not necessarily helpful as newborns do not possess the capacity for belief or disbelief. The problem is illustrated when you ask whether any such notion of humanity exists without that conditioning.

For any living thing, what does nature mean without nurture?
 

K.O.N.Y

Superstar
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
12,055
Reputation
2,785
Daps
41,522
Reppin
NEW YORK CITY
not an expert at all on the situation but.. I thought quantum physics proved time is a "thing" that can possibly be manipulated
 

Dwolf

Veteran
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
35,576
Reputation
9,637
Daps
107,332
Reppin
Murim
This post summarizes every thing I find is wrong in the new atheism movement. Atheism has no tenants, and yet people attribute it to 'reason' and giving such a simplistic, non-biased descriptor in 'atheist' an actual reason for being behind it. Atheism has nothing to do with reason. Any claim that it does is a holier-than-thou approach to try and feel superior to others. Have empathy for your fellow man, don't look down upon them. This is why many atheists look bad to others and why I find the cultural of political atheism, as seen on the internet, as a poisonous subculture.

Another quibble is how people assume that because I'm atheist I must be a scientist or am hugely turned on by science; I'm not. Science is merely a tool, like anything else. It can benefit man, it can be a detriment to man. But it's a tool, nonetheless. A lot of people on the internet who likely did not do well in science classes claim SCIENCE fukk YEAH and pretending to be science nerds. Knowledge is power, but please do not conflate scientific knowledge as being 'right'. People give science a bad name by doing so. That being said, I understand the hostility. Some believers are crazy about their anti-science approach, and science is definitely under attack by many fundamentalists. But that is no reason to condone such behavior.

As for philosophy, I find western philosophy dry. It has a lot of words, and the occasional nugget of wisdom, but it's not something that I - as in ME, not anyone else, or everyone in this world - can base my life around. Without a belief in God, there sometimes feels like a sense of emptiness. A lack of place, a lack of ritual, a lack of tradition, a lack of backbone for one's philosophical views and outlooks. For that, I turned to Buddhism. Due to its non-theistic views, I find it very pragmatic and the school that I practice - Soto Zen - fits within the confines of my life. It just makes sense to me, and I can be religious and have a sense of belonging without pretending I believe in God, or worshiping anything or anyone. It's refreshing. In that area, I have a lot of favorite philosophers, but my favorite is still the Shakyamuni Buddha. His philosophy covers everything, from relationships with friends and family, to government and politics and how to to be a good leader within Buddhist laymanship, from honoring ones parents and children, to understanding the inner turmoil that boils under the surface of man. Buddha said not to worship him, he claimed he was not a god, and that everything he had accomplished was from our own possibilities as human beings. I find Buddhism the best form of humanism. Eastern philosophy as a whole suits me more and I learn a lot from all sorts of Eastern faiths and political systems from Buddhism to Taoism to Confucianism.
Good shyt.
 
Top