That's the point of building the simulation
If we can build one then we most likely are living in one
But then that means the people simulating us lives in a simulations too
ehh, my head is starting to hurt
Black female atheists...do you exist?
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
ehh, my head is starting to hurt
Scientists observe the physical world and record the observations, and the only reason they make sense is because there is rhyme and REASON in the world. How does reason exist to such a high degree that it can be formally studied and recorded in countless tomes derive from complete nonintelligence and chaos?
Form and function are intelligent concepts. In order for life to be created and for that life to adapt to the environment in the first place, there has to be a recognition of the stimuli and pressures the environment provides. Then an adjustment takes place in response to that environment. The recognition of the forces of the environment and then providing a response to that environment requires intelligence... which, interestingly enough, is intelligence the creature itself is not even aware of or consciously controlling. Therefore, an intelligence exists that is independent of the conscious mind. Where did this intelligence derive from? Why is there even survival mechanisms if the world was created without a creator? A world created by complete nonintelligence and chaos has ZERO incentive to implement mechanisms in 'life' to further the propogation of that form of life.
Form and function are intelligent concepts. In order for life to be created and for that life to adapt to the environment in the first place, there has to be a recognition of the stimuli and pressures the environment provides. Then an adjustment takes place in response to that environment. The recognition of the forces of the environment and then providing a response to that environment requires intelligence... which, interestingly enough, is intelligence the creature itself is not even aware of or consciously controlling. Therefore, an intelligence exists that is independent of the conscious mind. Where did this intelligence derive from? Why is there even survival mechanisms if the world was created without a creator? A world created by complete nonintelligence and chaos has ZERO incentive to implement mechanisms in 'life' to further the propogation of that form of life.
Last edited:
I don't know the "odds" because such a thing can't be calculated because I'm not in possession of all the possibilities.
I can't give you a ratio to something I don't have the denominator to.
not necessarily.That's the point of building the simulation
If we can build one then we most likely are living in one
But then that means the people simulating us lives in a simulations too
Those in the scientific community disagree and a ton of money is being put into that theoretical framework. You can't try and create life and a laboratory and use that as sufficient evidence for abiogenesis and reject a simulation.
i bet we have higher odds winning the mega million lottery every year of your life until death, but i guess that's irrelevant.he's still right, not necessarily. it's possible, but just thinking about it gets me
just like this conversation.
i think a lot of atheist are just scorned christians. their kneejerk reaction seems to be attacking christianity and all the non-sense in the bible. i think there's a link between @Napoleon's views on gays and his views on religion. like if he could get you nikkas to get off the jesus kick, maybe y'all would be more accepting of gays.
Last edited:
Reason is a human creation. Its the attempt to streamline consistency for the sake of inquiry.
false.
Patterns are the result of efficiency, not design. Evidence supports this.
You don't have lungs where they are because they were PUT there, but because its the best place for them considering the conditions you live in and the selective pressures that have sustained their consistency.
This is just evolution
Theres nothing "intelligent" about chemotaxis.
Don't take this the wrong way, but if you took some psychology classes, you'd understand why you're wrong. This sentence makes no sense.
You have not proven this statement. Saying "therefore" doesn't mean anything.
You can't keep just saying "intelligence" without understandin git.
Eyes aren't fukking "intelligent" They just receive signals from outside the brain and interpret them into electrical signals.
You tell me. You're making shyt up then pretending you've proven something, all while misinterpreting what you don't even understand.
natural selection. Without an aversion to danger, species couldn't exist.
And how does this even imply a creator? What sort of specious logic is that??????
Prove this statement.
he's still right, not necessarily. it's possible, but just thinking about it gets me
http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
The math has already been done and it's just a matter of "can we do it?"
shyt*black girl catches eye*
*talks to her for a while*
*seems like a sweet cerebral chick*
*out of nowhere comes a bunch of scripture quoting *
is
the
wooooooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrssssssssssssstttttttttttttttt
The math hasn't been done yet.
You're just falling prey to this pop culture science bullshyt.
The crazy thing is they talk about religion more then the so called religious people do.
Actually that's happened with lots of chicks in general. It's more expected with black girls though.