BLACK MODEL REVEALS ON TIKTOK SAKS EMPLOYEES IGNORING HER WHILE WAITING TO BE SERVICED

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,358
Daps
82,647
I'm really not

How much deeper are we going? What new revelation am I supposed to be discerning?

White people don't like black people?
The fact that you are ignoring the racism and saying she shouldn’t buy those clothes as if black alternatives are accessible.

So she should just walk down the street to the black owned luxury store?

You act as if this is an even playing field, when it isn’t. There are systemic barriers in place. By putting the blame on the woman, you’re giving these business and these CACS a pass.

If it were a hospital and they refused treatment and a video filmed a patient asking white nurses to help them - would you say “oh nah she begging them white folks for treatment, couldn’t be me I go to a black-owned hospital” “crybaby ass c00n shoulda just went to a black hospital”

And before you say those two things aren’t related this is about clothes - when you’re advocating for this type of behavior by blaming the victim. You’d be c00ning, just like you were when you typed out that BS thinking you were doing something. Your nuance ceases to exist when you advocate in favor discrimination by blaming the black victim rather than the white perpetrator.

You’re creating a false scenario where the expectation is to be discriminated against, thereby the fault is on the victim. But that’s simply not the reality, it would be different if the store literally had “black people will be refused service” on the front door and a black clothing store was next door.

Stop your surface level BS. Doing the same shyt CACS do.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
20,010
Reputation
6,434
Daps
81,158
Reppin
NULL
The fact that you are ignoring the racism and saying she shouldn’t buy those clothes as if black alternatives are accessible.

So she should just walk down the street to the black owned luxury store?

You act as if this is an even playing field, when it isn’t. There are systemic barriers in place. By putting the blame on the woman, you’re giving these business and these CACS a pass.

If it were a hospital and they refused treatment and a video filmed a patient asking white nurses to help them - would you say “oh nah she begging them white folks for treatment, couldn’t be me I go to a black-owned hospital” “crybaby ass c00n shoulda just went to a black hospital”

And before you say those two things aren’t related this is about clothes - when you’re advocating for this type of behavior by blaming the victim. You’d be c00ning, just like you were when you typed out that BS thinking you were doing something. Your nuance ceases to exist when you advocate in favor discrimination by blaming the black victim rather than the white perpetrator.

You’re creating a false scenario where the expectation is to be discriminated against, thereby the fault is on the victim. But that’s simply not the reality, it would be different if the store literally had “black people will be refused service” on the front door and a black clothing store was next door.

Stop your surface level BS. Doing the same shyt CACS do.
I'm ignoring racism with an argument hinged on the fact that racism exists? I got that right?

No shyt systematic barriers exist. One of things that keeps them up is a collective unwillingness to punish the behaviors of that system

Your "Black owned luxury store" comment says it all. If a black owned luxury store doesn't exist it's because a black person hasn't built one. Crying in the white luxury store only emphasizes how much you value the toys white people make and your unwillingness to say fukk your clothes if this treatment is what comes with it. That's why there's no "black owned luxury store"

You accused me of lacking nuance in a situation where I don't use nuance anyway. You handle shyt from a position of strength or weakness. This shyt is WEAK

Racists know when they're being racist. You give these cacs a pass when you show them :to:"I really wanna buy y'all shyt can you just not treat me like you always have?"

You really want me to appear as if I'm in favor of the racist store, as if it'll make the weakness go down easier for you and hey:manny:

Black folks still the only ones that don't see the power we wield when we say fukk you we aint going for it. Us nearly shutting the country down last summer should be proof enough

But by all means, go cry in the middle of Saks:manny:







 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,358
Daps
82,647
I'm ignoring racism with an argument hinged on the fact that racism exists? I got that right?
No, you have it wrong.

Let me reiterate what I already said so you get the point:

You act as if this is an even playing field, when it isn’t. There are systemic barriers in place. By putting the blame on the woman, you’re giving these business and these CACS a pass. You are blaming the victim in the scenario and thereby defending and absolving racist CACS and the systems that perpetuate them from any responsibility.

No shyt systematic barriers exist. One of things that keeps them up is a collective unwillingness to punish the behaviors of that system

Such as blaming the black person for experiencing racism. Like you’re doing right now - the literal antithesis of whatever you just said.

Your "Black owned luxury store" comment says it all. If a black owned luxury store doesn't exist it's because a black person hasn't built one. Crying in the white luxury store only emphasizes how much you value the toys white people make and your unwillingness to say fukk your clothes if this treatment is what comes with it. That's why there's no "black owned luxury store"

NO, YOUR COMMENT SAYS IT ALL. How can you in your previous sentence acknowledge systemic racism and how it has kept black people from building their own luxury stores. And in THE NEXT FUKKING SENTENCE literally spew out some Fox News shyt like “If a black owned luxury store doesn't exist it's because a black person hasn't built one.” As if the fault is on black people

When you should asking saying “why don’t black owned luxury stores exist in Manhattan?” And THEN acknowledging that SYSTEMIC RACISM IS WHY.

Instead you’d rather blame black people for experiencing racism for the reason why there aren’t any black owned luxury stores. Thereby removing the responsibility of WHITE PEOPLE AND SYSTEMIC RACISM from the equation.

You’d be the same type of mfer to blame Africans for being sold into slavery.


You want it to be one way but it’s the other way. You’re no better than a c00n. And don’t try to move the goal posts with that weak vs strong bullshyt. When your first thought is to blame the black woman when she experiences racism, rather than DEFEND your own like a STRONG black man. And instead have that smoke for these CACS like you would be if you came from a position of STRENGTH.

And not a WEAK ass c00n looking to down your own people and trying to mask it under revolutionary talk (that does not apply to you) after you’ve already shown your true colors through your actions.
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,307
Reputation
2,530
Daps
103,274
Yet another instance of being treated as a second class citizen in America because of the color of your skin.

Personally, fukk “luxury” brands. Over priced bullshyt that’s not getting a penny from me!
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,307
Reputation
2,530
Daps
103,274
No, you have it wrong.

Let me reiterate what I already said so you get the point:

You act as if this is an even playing field, when it isn’t. There are systemic barriers in place. By putting the blame on the woman, you’re giving these business and these CACS a pass. You are blaming the victim in the scenario and thereby defending and absolving racist CACS and the systems that perpetuate them from any responsibility.



Such as blaming the black person for experiencing racism. Like you’re doing right now - the literal antithesis of whatever you just said.



NO, YOUR COMMENT SAYS IT ALL. How can you in your previous sentence acknowledge systemic racism and how it has kept black people from building their own luxury stores. And in THE NEXT FUKKING SENTENCE literally spew out some Fox News shyt like “If a black owned luxury store doesn't exist it's because a black person hasn't built one.” As if the fault is on black people

When you should asking saying “why don’t black owned luxury stores exist in Manhattan?” And THEN acknowledging that SYSTEMIC RACISM IS WHY.

Instead you’d rather blame black people for experiencing racism for the reason why there aren’t any black owned luxury stores. Thereby removing the responsibility of WHITE PEOPLE AND SYSTEMIC RACISM from the equation.

You’d be the same type of mfer to blame Africans for being sold into slavery.


You want it to be one way but it’s the other way. You’re no better than a c00n. And don’t try to move the goal posts with that weak vs strong bullshyt. When your first thought is to blame the black woman when she experiences racism, rather than DEFEND your own like a STRONG black man. And instead have that smoke for these CACS like you would be if you came from a position of STRENGTH.

And not a WEAK ass c00n looking to down your own people and trying to mask it under revolutionary talk (that does not apply to you) after you’ve already shown your true colors through your actions.
They are ignorant.

Any time someone says bullshyt like “Why hasn’t a black person done so and so then?” Remind them of two young black women that opened up a hair shop and was forced fi close because they were discriminated by asian wholesalers.
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,307
Reputation
2,530
Daps
103,274
nah 27 pushin my own 535i that I’ve posted plenty of times on here

I just posted ounces of coke in a thread like last week and nikka was complaining
:mjlol: Continue being a family man , you can’t Fucc with me . I’d victimize you
Incriminate yourself to humble brag brehs
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,307
Reputation
2,530
Daps
103,274
She's obviously the victim here and did nothing wrong, but leaving in tears, man :mjlol: But part of the same generation talking about "I'm not my grandparents" like they were just some pussies while going through Jim Crow.
Leaving in tears might have been cap. Shorty is a model, they get scrutinized harshly, she has to have some sort of thick skin.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,241
Daps
60,682
Reppin
NULL
“We can’t allow” ?! bytch ass nikka so why she allow it herself?
:gucci: A simp c00n , damn

Stop acting like a little ass boy and think like a man

I'm not talking about her, it's not about her

That's the problem with you small minded nikkaz, you leap before you look, a react on your first emotion

how can you call yourself an adult man and think like this, you gonna be the first to die if world war III happened and you drafted

The point was, it doesn't matter, a c00n, a sambo, they still black, and no black person should be disrespected anywhere simply because they are black, I don't care who it is

Anything less is weakness
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,241
Daps
60,682
Reppin
NULL
Its literally hundreds of white owned establishments out there from middle class to high class owned by white folks and they have workers mgmt and top mgmt got a problem with black customers...:beli: you gonna fight them all???! :manny: its 2021 tactics need to change, do like the jews do, shop at places where your people own it...

It's not about money economics, that's not relevant to my point

it's about respect

the white lady was made this black lady could shop in there and had more money than her, so she decided to disrespect her by reminder she is an n-word this is what they do when their mad

no black person should be disrespect in public like that simply for being black, period, I don't care who it is

anything less is weakness
 

True Blue Moon

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
12,200
Reputation
3,928
Daps
39,415
Reppin
VA. Living in the City of Angels
Leaving in tears might have been cap. Shorty is a model, they get scrutinized harshly, she has to have some sort of thick skin.
Definitely possible. I leave some space for hormone changes or just having a shytty day if it's not cap. But you're right, models don't get far without some measure of mental toughness.
 
Top