InterWhat?Cause as time and time proves again...it's BLACK PEOPLE vs. EVERYONE ELSE.
No one understands white supremacy, race, racism, white privilege, and all of that more than US. I'm so shocked at how racially unaware other minorities are in America and on a global scale. And y'all other minorities expect us to speak up for you when you too scared to go at whitey?
Get out of here. WE fighting this battle alone for all I care.
Alot of them gunning for that honorary white supremacist label...alot of them have anti-blackness deeply entrenched in their cultures and they use that to fit into white society. Alot of them exploit us too. They ain't our friends.
Sick and tired of being nice to people who wouldn't spit on us to put out a fire.
You are the epitome of a smart dumb nikka.
Don't quote me again.![]()
All back people do not face the same issues as a whole. Hypothetically speaking if we were to win the war against white supremacy, the people who would benefit the most would be black men and yall wouldn't fight for us.
remember the civil rights movement, where black man were fighting for the same rights as white men knowing damn well black women would still be disenfranchised.
bu but feminism
@ridedolo is right. You're a cac bringing up inane and divisive issues. Begone.
No it's actually a good observation after all the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.Please leave this divisive nonsense out of this thread in advance. Thank you very much.
No dumb ass, my whole point is that you can't talk about "black issues" as if the only ones that matter affect black men specifically, as if they're aren't black women with their own unique issues. And black women should not be told "go cry to the CACs" about them.
If saying that makes me a "CAC" then what the fukk does that make the nikkas who willingly marginalize the issues of their women?
No it's actually a good observation after all the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.
Can you expound on this?remember the civil rights movement, where black man were fighting for the same rights as white men knowing damn well black women would still be disenfranchised.
bu but feminism![]()
You're a cac so you don't fundamentally understand black issues and how they relate to black male and females' respectively. Black women benefit when general black issues are solved, same as black men. Their so-called "unique" issues are less important and can be addressed at a differnet time (if they need addressing at all). The Europeans showed the blueprint: specific white female issues were addressed AFTER general white issues were addressed and solutions applied.

Stopped reading right there. Funny how I'm the CAC but you're the one spitting grade A CAC bullshyt logic.![]()
Your point is? This is obviously your personal opinion. I'm curious to know why you feel that way.All back people do not face the same issues as a whole. Hypothetically speaking if we were to win the war against white supremacy, the people who would benefit the most would be black men and yall wouldn't fight for us.
remember the civil rights movement, where black man were fighting for the same rights as white men knowing damn well black women would still be disenfranchised.
bu but feminism
of course it does but poor blacks have more barriers to deal with that middle class/rich blacks don't
I don't particularly care whether you read the paragraph as you're a cac with an anti-black agenda. You're not concerned with facts; you just want to neuter the pro-black movement. As such I wrote the reply to show any readers the illogical, ahistoric and fallacious of your view.
Every time I hear that word "intersectionality" ..its always a black chick with locks and a White boyfriend saying it.![]()

You don't have an actual argument, so you have to resort to calling people CACs when they see through your bullshyt. Telling.