Black People need to dead this "P.O.C./Intersectionality" bullsh1t.

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,371
Reputation
14,159
Daps
246,520
Cause as time and time proves again...it's BLACK PEOPLE vs. EVERYONE ELSE.

No one understands white supremacy, race, racism, white privilege, and all of that more than US. I'm so shocked at how racially unaware other minorities are in America and on a global scale. And y'all other minorities expect us to speak up for you when you too scared to go at whitey?
:camby:

Get out of here. WE fighting this battle alone for all I care.

Alot of them gunning for that honorary white supremacist label...alot of them have anti-blackness deeply entrenched in their cultures and they use that to fit into white society. Alot of them exploit us too. They ain't our friends.

Sick and tired of being nice to people who wouldn't spit on us to put out a fire.
InterWhat?

 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,783
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
All back people do not face the same issues as a whole. Hypothetically speaking if we were to win the war against white supremacy, the people who would benefit the most would be black men and yall wouldn't fight for us.

remember the civil rights movement, where black man were fighting for the same rights as white men knowing damn well black women would still be disenfranchised.
bu but feminism

Your assertions don't pass basic scrutiny logically and historically.

As history and logic shows,, what is best in the long term for rich blacks is also what is best for poor blacks. When rich whites came to America and lead the assault on the Natives using poor white bodies, the rich whites benefitted from greater land, resources and--but so too poor whites ultimately benefited (look at all the land the whites reaped; all the opportunity; all the profit). Similarly, when white males became rich and powerful, so too did white females.

In analogy, black women benefit when black men benefit and lose out when black men lose out, same as white men and women. To use your own example, Black women benefited immensely and incontrovertibly from black man leading the Civil Rights movement. The list of rights and privileges black women gleaned from black men's Civil Rights work is now inexhaustible 60 years later, same as the privileges and rights granted by European men vis-a-vis white women. See, even if black women remain unequal to black men, like white women are unequal to white men, this does not mean nothing is gained.

The world is not an all-or-nothing place.
 
Last edited:

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,412
Reputation
9,776
Daps
191,932
Reppin
NULL
@ridedolo is right. You're a cac bringing up inane and divisive issues. Begone.


No dumb ass, my whole point is that you can't talk about "black issues" as if the only ones that matter affect black men specifically, as if they're aren't black women with their own unique issues. And black women should not be told "go cry to the CACs" about them.

If saying that makes me a "CAC" then what the fukk does that make the nikkas who willingly marginalize the issues of their women?
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,783
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
No dumb ass, my whole point is that you can't talk about "black issues" as if the only ones that matter affect black men specifically, as if they're aren't black women with their own unique issues. And black women should not be told "go cry to the CACs" about them.

If saying that makes me a "CAC" then what the fukk does that make the nikkas who willingly marginalize the issues of their women?

You're a cac so you don't fundamentally understand black issues and how they relate to black male and females' respectively. Moreover you are incentivized to cause division in order to weak black men's strength. You'll say whatever you think is most appealing so that you achieve your cac aims. However to address anyone who might think you have any legitimacy:

Black women benefit when general black issues are solved, same as black men. Their so-called "unique" issues are less important and can be addressed at a different time (if they need addressing at all given many gender issues resolve naturally on their own). The Europeans showed the blueprint: specific white female issues were addressed AFTER general white issues were addressed and solutions applied. The British did not listen or prioritize listening to white women's kvetching in comparison to convening war councils and increasing the British Empire's share of the world. If a white woman complains she cannot go out on expedition, oh well, she can wait.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,783
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
No it's actually a good observation after all the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.

It's not a "good observation at all". Your view represents a critical misunderstanding of the issues. You separate black and female advancement as though they are mutually exclusive when they are in fact mutually inclusive. Furthermore you think there is no value in achievements in they are not completely gender neutral and equal. This is a misnomer and not backed by one ounce of reason or history. There have been completely male-pushed achievements which benefited men more than women, yet were of such monumental significance that women benefited an unprecedented degree as well.
 

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,412
Reputation
9,776
Daps
191,932
Reppin
NULL
You're a cac so you don't fundamentally understand black issues and how they relate to black male and females' respectively. Black women benefit when general black issues are solved, same as black men. Their so-called "unique" issues are less important and can be addressed at a differnet time (if they need addressing at all). The Europeans showed the blueprint: specific white female issues were addressed AFTER general white issues were addressed and solutions applied.

Stopped reading right there. Funny how I'm the CAC but you're the one spitting grade A CAC bullshyt logic. :camby:
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,783
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
Stopped reading right there. Funny how I'm the CAC but you're the one spitting grade A CAC bullshyt logic. :camby:

I don't particularly care whether you accept my argumengt that black women benefit as blackck men do as you're a cac with an anti-black agenda. You're not concerned with facts; you just want to neuter the pro-black movement. As such I wrote the reply to show any readers the illogical, ahistoric and fallacious of your view.

Suffice to say, any view in a black context which cacs agree with should be viewed with the utmost suspicion, if not dismissed outright. Cacs like you act in their own self-interest.
 
Last edited:

wooled1

All Star
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
503
Reputation
420
Daps
2,843
All back people do not face the same issues as a whole. Hypothetically speaking if we were to win the war against white supremacy, the people who would benefit the most would be black men and yall wouldn't fight for us.
remember the civil rights movement, where black man were fighting for the same rights as white men knowing damn well black women would still be disenfranchised.
bu but feminism:rudy:


of course it does but poor blacks have more barriers to deal with that middle class/rich blacks don't
Your point is? This is obviously your personal opinion. I'm curious to know why you feel that way.
 

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,412
Reputation
9,776
Daps
191,932
Reppin
NULL
I don't particularly care whether you read the paragraph as you're a cac with an anti-black agenda. You're not concerned with facts; you just want to neuter the pro-black movement. As such I wrote the reply to show any readers the illogical, ahistoric and fallacious of your view.

You don't have an actual argument, so you have to resort to calling people CACs when they see through your bullshyt. Telling.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,783
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
You don't have an actual argument, so you have to resort to calling people CACs when they see through your bullshyt. Telling.

Anyone who reads my post will tell that I make strong arguments for the illogical, ahistorical and absurd nature of your views. Essentially I argue black women benefit when black men benefit. Your argument? Nill. You make no counterargument, cac, only ad hominem . Why? Because you have no argument. You're just a cac with an axe to grind. For the above reasons, anything which a cac contrives or agrees with in a black context should be evaluated with suspicion, if not dismissed outright. Malcolm X said so too.
 
Top