Black supremacy vs black dominance

[Savvir]

You’re simply confused and don’t understand the idea behind this thread.

Let adults talk and go shoo yourself elsewhere.

General consensus supports my point.

Who are your people and where do you come from?

 

[TheJet]

OP must have just lost his bytch to a breh for the 1st time. It gets better, Cooper. Hang in there

 

[BlackJesus]

OP must have just lost his bytch to a breh for the 1st time. It gets better, Cooper. Hang in there

Can’t be offended when my name is not Cooper nor did I lose anything

But get your internet daps I ain’t mad at you

 

[BlackJesus]

General consensus supports my point.

Who are your people and where do you come from?

I don’t owe you an explanation. Neither do you need to be here

 

[Bunchy Carter]

It seems a lot of TheColi doesn't really understand the difference between the two. You have a lot of people advocating "black supremacy" as the way forward and if you ask them what that looks like its "building a community of strong men" or "circulating the black dollar" or "growing black businesses".

That is black dominance. That's what we did in Greenwood, Tulsa (aka black wall street). We built a strong, prosperous community. White folks got jealous of our economic dominance and burnt that down. Black dominance is worthy goal but it is susceptible to the jealousy, resentment and retribution of the ruling society. You don't rule the society you just dominate it. Like how black players dominate the NBA league but don't own the teams or set the rules.

Black supremacy is a completely different paradigm and creating a whole new social environment that favors black people to the disadvantage of other races. It is a complete reversal of the current situation we are in. Instead of our cities being burnt down, we burn down white towns. Instead of blacks fighting for scraps at the table other races fight for our scraps. It means we are at the top of social, military and economic ladder.

Black supremacy is Erik Killmonger. Black Dominance is Greenwood, Tulsa.

Black supremacy is maybe too radical a change for most of you. We are comfortable in our current situation whether we admit it or not. If you really want Black Supremacy understand what it really means and why you want it. Then once you know what it is you want, make a plan to get it.

Speak on it.

I found a picture of Op while he was writting this post:

 

[BlackJesus]

I found a picture of Op while he was writting this post:

I think that it secretly excites you thinking that white people care about your problems enough to larp on a hip hop forum as a black man

 

[Ish Gibor]

@Ish Geber

This thread is not about whether or not black supremacy exists. It's highlighting the difference between ruling and dominating an activity.

When black NBA players "dominate" basketball or black boxers dominate boxing that is not black supremacy. It is black domination.

Jack Johnson will tell you when he dominated the sport of boxing in the early 1900s, those who had exercised "supremacy" made life hard for him.

Supremacy is a whole different ballgame. 99.9% of TheColi posters are not ready for that. But 60% of them advocate it.

Ok, I see what you mean and I agree with the opening post.

The people who control these sports make the rules. That is supremacy.
The people who excel at what they do, dominate.

From a sociological point of view supremacy doesn't have to be a bad thing, depending on how supremacy applies the rules. White supremacy has created a socioeconomic unjust system. That is why those domestic terrorist who destroyed Tulsa, have never been convicted, let alone arrested.

African-American prisoners who were convicted of murder are about 50 percent more likely to be innocent than other convicted murderers and spend longer in prison before exoneration, according to a report released today that’s co-edited by a Michigan State University College of Law professor.

African-Americans More Likely to be Wrongfully Convicted

"African Americans are more frequently stopped, searched, arrested, and convicted—including in cases in which they are innocent. The extreme form of this practice is systematic racial profiling in drug-law enforcement. pp. 20-21"
[…]

African-American prisoners who are convicted of murder are about 50% more likely to be innocent than other convicted murderers. Part of that disparity is tied to the race of the victim. African Americans imprisoned for murder are more likely to be innocent if they were convicted of killing white victims. Only about 15% of murders by African Americans have white victims, but 31% of innocent African-American murder exonerees were convicted of killing white people.

http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf

 

[Savvir]

I don’t owe you an explanation. Neither do you need to be here

who are your people and where do you come from?

 

[BlackJesus]

Ok, I see what you mean and I agree with the opening post.

The people who control these sports make the rules. That is supremacy.
The people who excel at what they do, dominate.

From a sociological point of view supremacy doesn't have to be a bad thing, depending on how supremacy applies the rules. White supremacy has created a socioeconomic unjust system. That is why those domestics terrorist who destroyed Tulsa, have never been convicted, let alone arrested.

Yes my brotha. Finally an intelligent poster. Hallelujah! Someone got it

who are your people and where do you come from?

 

[Ish Gibor]

Yes my brotha. Finally an intelligent poster. Hallelujah! Someone got it

Sorry for the typos. I need to take a break.

Peace

 

[CodeKansas]

Its spelled “Jim Crow” Einstein. And the thread is not about whether it exists or not it’s only highlighting the differences between the two concepts.

Go do dumbassery somewhere other than here

I called you Gym Crow because that's the nickname Terry Crews, a well known c00n, got after speaking about "black supremacy" being what black folks were going for as opposed to black equality and justice.

fukking goofy.