Bleacher Report's Top 100 NBA Players of All-Time

bigde09

Veteran
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
11,541
Reputation
5,399
Daps
64,653
Reppin
NULL
Dude I will never understand why anyone dismisses that championship.

Why doesn’t that count? Every team was on an even playing field. Did those Lakers somehow have an unfair advantage? How were they predisposed to winning in “the bubble”??

It was a neutral arena. You know what else is a neutral arena? Almost every Olympics basketball court.

Bashing the bubble ring makes zero sense.
biggest dikkrider on here as the nerve to pretend he's above stan wars. look at this post :hhh:
 

Gotright

Superstar
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
10,438
Reputation
188
Daps
22,950
Reppin
detroit
No I didn’t make that up. I know how cacs in America perceive Black ppl and Kobe wasn’t exempt of that. Just because they weren’t outwardly open about viewing him as uppity doesn’t mean he wasn’t viewed that way.



Magic wasn’t a liability on defense overall. He could guard multiple positions and was even the league leader in steals for multiple seasons. Curry was never that and had to rely on a strong system to help hide his weaknesses.
Curry lead the NBA in steals once and avg the same amount of steals as magic
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,901
Reputation
10,032
Daps
239,635
No I didn’t make that up. I know how cacs in America perceive Black ppl think and Kobe wasn’t exempt of that. Just because they weren’t outwardly open about viewing him as uppity doesn’t mean he wasn’t viewed that way.
Yes you did make that up. You obviously weren’t of an appropriate age to witness how Kobe was perceived back then.

The funniest thing in your attempt at claiming white folks didn’t like “uppity” Black athletes who came from functional, two-parent households who were confident in themselves, is that you’re literally describing MJ, and he is the most-beloved basketball player in history among white Americans.

Yet here you are trying to paint a picture that peckerwoods did a 180 when Kobe came into the league.
Magic wasn’t a liability on defense overall. He could guard multiple positions and was even the league leader in steals for multiple seasons. Curry was never that and had to rely on a strong system to help hide his weaknesses.
You didn’t watch Magic play, so you can stop the bullshytting.

Steals are such a lazy way of measuring defense, so I really don’t know what point you’re trying to prove, especially when Steph led the league in steals too. Go figure. If you’re using that as a defense for Magic, then you can’t use it against Steph.

You’re just foolishly equating his stature to being a liability, when he was anything but that throughout his career. If he truly was, then he wouldn’t have had even 1/3 of the success. He would’ve dragged his teams down to the point of where they would’ve been better off without him.
 

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
8,299
Reputation
773
Daps
17,412
Yes you did make that up. You obviously weren’t of an appropriate age to witness how Kobe was perceived back then.

The funniest thing in your attempt at claiming white folks didn’t like “uppity” Black athletes who came from functional, two-parent households who were confident in themselves, is that you’re literally describing MJ, and he is the most-beloved basketball player in history among white Americans.

Yet here you are trying to paint a picture that peckerwoods did a 180 when Kobe came into the league.

You didn’t watch Magic play, so you can stop the bullshytting.

Steals are such a lazy way of measuring defense, so I really don’t know what point you’re trying to prove, especially when Steph led the league in steals too. Go figure. If you’re using that as a defense for Magic, then you can’t use it against Steph.

You’re just foolishly equating his stature to being a liability, when he was anything but that throughout his career. If he truly was, then he wouldn’t have had even 1/3 of the success. He would’ve dragged his teams down to the point of where they would’ve been better off without him.

No I’m not making any of this up lol. My uncle grew up with Kobe’s parents and was in Philly during his rise. I’m most likely fewer degrees of separation from Kobe than almost everyone on here. And MJ came from a two parent household but always presented himself as humble in the public when he came into the league.

And yes Curry is more of a defensive liability than Magic and a big part of that is his size. Magic could guard multiple positions while Curry couldn’t.
 

FlyRy

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
31,548
Reputation
3,525
Daps
64,510
Trying to move the goalposts :russell:

I said Lebron wasnt a closer, then you, as a stat watcher, brought stats without nuanced. When the nuance shows that he didn't do much in the last 4 mins of both 4th quarters. Now instead of admitting that he didn't actually "close" like you said, you're trying to move the goalpost to another example of you blindly stat watching without nuance.




"I didn't make any case." Exactly. You're here to whine about threads you always involve yourself in

I don't know who "dear leader" refers to but I think people are tired of the narratives the media/Lebron/Klutch uses to prop him up at the expense of others. And by people I mean those who arent fanboys that stat watch and think "better stats automatically means better player"
If you want to play this stupid game look up 2010 play by play because Bean didn't do much either. Just some fts
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,804
Reputation
2,995
Daps
78,439
Reppin
NULL
Gil's Arena actually touched on this the day the list dropped. Gilbert is an idiot 50-66.67% of the time but I give credit for the perspective he gave in that segment, where he broke down the most likely criteria BR (and media members use) -which is a lot of what you asked OpenAi to compute- and educated the rest of the cast on it.

Basically said you can either make your list off emotion or criteria, and you can argue criteria but can't argue someone's emotion. i.e. if a criteria prioritizes MVPs, Finals MVPs, scoring titles, and All-NBA First Teams as the 4 most important individual accolades, then yea Kobe's gonna be more fringe top 10. Even Kenyon -the biggest Iverson stan- admitted that sick to his stomach as he was to see AI outside of the top 30, based on criteria he couldn't say shyt even tho emotionally AI to him is top 20.

The collective issue they had with BR's list tho is that it doesn't prioritize defensive teams as strongly/consistently, specifically bc they felt Duncan should be ahead of Shaq and top 5 all time. Tho they also made the point that if you were to list all the defensive 1st team winners this year or in most years (esp compared to all nba 1st team names) you can see why defensive teams aren't held as highly. As a result, they also felt Russell there was a bit fugazi/inconsistent as well

Point is, based on the likely/provided criteria i mostly see why BR's list and even your Open AI's list is what it is. And everyone is free to come up with their own criteria, which is part of the fun imo... but not worth discussing if the criteria is emotionally charged (i.e. "PG is my GOAT, fukk u stat nerds!", etc)

Yeah, personally I don't think there's 7 people better than Kobe. I think the only bonafide person is Jordan. The rest are people who get named just because. I think it's unfortunate that Kobe was shytted on by the media so he didn't get the MVPs he deserved and the narrative about him playing with Shaq stuck so people feel they can discredit his career -- even though he was putting up Jordan numbers during the three peat. For example, it makes no sense that Kobe had the #1 record in the harder Western Conference for two years and won two championship rings and averaged similar stats and they still gave the MVP to LeBron. Fair judges would've given the 2009 MVP to LeBron, then saw everything Kobe did that Finals and gave the 2010 MVP to Kobe which would at least give him two MVP awards but, they weren't playing fair :beli: So now when you run Kobe's awards and accomplishments through mechanisms like OpenAI, it puts him towards the back of the top ten list eventhough we know with our eyes that he's closer to the middle (5-7 range).

In terms of AI, he was extremely talented. I went back and really looked at some of his highlights, and in hindsight, Philly was not a serious place. They paired him up with garbage and expected him to win. Some of those guys would struggle to make an NBA roster today. They should've traded as many picks and players as they needed to get a real secondary player. Sucks for AI because he had the talent to be ranked alot higher.
 

FlyRy

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
31,548
Reputation
3,525
Daps
64,510
Yeah, personally I don't think there's 7 people better than Kobe. I think the only bonafide person is Jordan. The rest are people who get named just because. I think it's unfortunate that Kobe was shytted on by the media so he didn't get the MVPs he deserved and the narrative about him playing with Shaq stuck so people feel they can discredit his career -- even though he was putting up Jordan numbers during the three peat. For example, it makes no sense that Kobe had the #1 record in the harder Western Conference for two years and won two championship rings and averaged similar stats and they still gave the MVP to LeBron. Fair judges would've given the 2009 MVP to LeBron, then saw everything Kobe did that Finals and gave the 2010 MVP to Kobe which would at least give him two MVP awards but, they weren't playing fair :beli: So now when you run Kobe's awards and accomplishments through mechanisms like OpenAI, it puts him towards the back of the top ten list eventhough we know with our eyes that he's closer to the middle (5-7 range).

In terms of AI, he was extremely talented. I went back and really looked at some of his highlights, and in hindsight, Philly was not a serious place. They paired him up with garbage and expected him to win. Some of those guys would struggle to make an NBA roster today. They should've traded as many picks and players as they needed to get a real secondary player. Sucks for AI because he had the talent to be ranked alot higher.
:what:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,496
Reputation
-2,239
Daps
17,830
If you want to play this stupid game


So what we have here is you bringing 2 games as proof that Lebron is a closer. Once I bring the context to show he didn't do anything the last 4 minutes in the games YOU brought, you're now bringing random Kobe games to deflect from being wrong
:russ:
 
Top