None of this matters. They both had stipulations during first negotiation. Only one of them agreed to the other.But you would've had to go back over two years for that statement to be true.. Floyd had fought twice since De La Hoya and could barely scratch a million..
Now if you use that logic and go back two years to the Pac/Bradley 1, that fight did around 900k which is around the same as Floyds last ppv numbers, so they sould be 50/50 right?? Using your logic of course
lmao you basically just said mayweather was a bigger draw for a two year period.But you would've had to go back over two years for that statement to be true.. Floyd had fought twice since De La Hoya and could barely scratch a million..
Now if you use that logic and go back two years to the Pac/Bradley 1, that fight did around 900k which is around the same as Floyds last ppv numbers, so they sould be 50/50 right?? Using your logic of course
lmao you basically just said mayweather was a bigger draw for a two year period.
at NO POINT was pacqiao worthy of an even split with mayweather, the only time it was close was 2012 when he was going to jail but OOPS, arum had to build a stadium and May was 'IMPOSSIBLE' but june was 'perfect'
I think at that point they were 1A and 1B, close enough for it not to matter. They both had stipulations and only one side agreed to the others.How was he a bigger draw in 2009 during negotiations though when Pac was outsold his previous two fights at the time in ppv??
you seriously dont want to see this fight?
Canelo don't want that issue
Not going to outdo Mayweather.
It's called business.Oh now it dont matter when Pac is selling more ppvs.. they were "close enough"
Where was Floyd at this year after Pac beat p4p Bradley and his ppvs were "close enough" to Floyd/Maidana to warrent a 50/50 or 50/45 split then??
Wait until Pac has nobody else to fight but a no name ex kickboxer that cant help draw any ppv numbers to say you want the fight brehs
