cant argue with young people because they dont have life experience ... or any experience with shyt they talk about
you will sit and live through decades of shyt and young people wont even see half of the shyt they prop up
and still wanna argue, like you didnt see 3 - 4 different versions of what they are talking about
it goes for most things in the world... you gotta be a dumb motherfukker to not realize what history actually is
nikkas werent just dropping people off yesterday, today and tomorrow. The game or music or art is built off what happened before. If you arent old enough to see shyt ever evolve you shouldnt have an opinion on it. The game from 60s to 80s changed, the 90s changes ... 2000s changed .... 10s changed ... now its changed. Its not the fact that things were better or worse ever... you literally take what you have at that time. If you put Harden in the 90s he cant play because every move is gonna be a carry or walk and he's gonna get handchecked. Same with Embiid, you cant expect him to finesse and shoot in the 70s when he would be handchecked and most of his dribbles would be called a carry immediately. The game is just different, you cant judge something so far apart when the game was entirely different. shyt, in that era if your hand even went under or on the side of the ball it was a carry...they didnt believe in that hesi shyt... hesistation is literally by definition a carry. It wasnt even being thought of to do that because people would kick you off the court.
dude above is mad dumb too saying Cousy wouldnt make the league today.... that's wishful thinking I can name hundreds of trash players who've made the league for 5 year minimum that didnt do shyt, outside of a dude that won and completely innovated the game in general with no blueprint to rock off of .... yall are mad weird. That's like saying Kareem didnt dominate and innovate the game in areas that are still seen till this day ... but he wouldnt be a great player because of "talent pool" lol
