Bro you literally contradict yourself. You just admitted people are reluctant to wear masks NOW after over 100000 deaths yet when I say trump is not the only one responsible I’m downplaying and deflecting?? I have patients in a clinic that think covid is a hoax in the same clinic I had 6 positive cases. Why would you wait until cases arrive to take standard precautions like wearing a 99 cent mask? Does that make sense?? He said that in mid February. Congress and trump were briefed in January. They ALL downplayed it.
Who ever said Trump is the "only" one responsible for COVID-19 deaths in America? Me pointing out that Trump purposely downplayed it and me pointing out that Americans are bullheaded isn't contradictory. Those factors work together.
And different people have different thresholds for taking precautions. But when there are only about 30 cases in a country of 300,000,000 and nearly all those cases are in just a couple areas, of course most folk aren't going to take a bunch of extra precautions. If you tell people to do a bunch of shyt that is unlikely to have any impact due to the lack of current risk in their area, they're that much less likely to listen when you tell them to do things when the risk is high. It's the crying-wolf issue.
I never said Ebola was meant to depopulate Africa. I said Ebola is genetically modified Marburg. Africans had NO history of hemorragic fever before Ebola. Marburg is being experimented with in Germany where they had outbreaks and then they move to clinical trials and the rest is classified. Then you have a outbreak in a remote village in Africa. How convenient.
The bolded is 100% false. Rift Valley Fever, Lassa, Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever, Dengue, and Yellow Fever are all examples of hemorrhagic fevers that plagued Africa long before ebola first hit.
You probably heard someone say that
Filoviridae-family viruses weren't known from Africa until marburg and ebola. But marburg and ebola were the first
Filoviridae-family viruses discovered anywhere! They're resident in primate and bat populations in Africa and only jumped for the first time recently. Numerous new diseases are getting discovered all the time, including in the USA.
Disease studies, especially tropical disease studies, were still primitive until recently, so it's no surprise that we didn't know a lot about a lot of shyt. Especially when new diseases jump from animals to humans all the time. Your entire conspiracy seems to have zero evidence, it's just built on a couple of coincidences. You make a big deal of Marburg being discovered in lab monkeys (even though that makes sense cause in the 1960s the vast majority of scientists only saw lab monkeys, they weren't going to Africa to study disease) and the fact that Ebola and Marburg were discovered about 10 years apart. Neither of those "coincidences" is particularly unlikely or surprising.
Now answer my question about genetic engineering. Genetic engineering didn't even start until the 1970s. The first genetically engineered seed wasn't produced until 1983. But you want us to believe that the very first genetic engineers were able to immediately create one of the deadliest viruses known to man way back in 1975 within 2-3 years of the field starting? And do it in such a way that no scientist studying the virus over the next 50 years has ever been able to show how it would have been the product of genetic engineering?
