Bodyguard knocks out woman for talking shyt.... Was he wrong???

[ConPHIdential]

How was she the aggressor towards him? Maybe you’re seeing something I’m not. If she inadvertently hit him, that in no way justifies his actions. Plus, after he hit her the first time and she tried to defend herself, that does not make her the aggressor.


Again maybe you are seeing something I’m not seeing. I saw her confronting someone else and he became the aggressor towards her and continued to fight her even as she clearly was not capable of fighting him back.



Ahh throwing punches near, not directly at, so tell me why he punched her directly? So you saw that it wasn’t him that was the recipient of her aggression yet he decided to take out his aggression on her.

I don’t fight. I avoid physical confrontation. I’m 5’4 and am not that strong, lol. What do I look like attacking anyone? Lol.



Too old yet you defend his actions so carelessly. Why was he right to act the way he did especially if he was not the person she was trying to attack? He’s too old to be allowing his emotions to dictate his behavior as well. Regardless of how you all want to justify it, he was excessive. He should have had enough control to not have acted that way. Especially if his job was to break up the chaos.



She was engaging someone else. I’ve seen bouncers try to break up a fight. I’ve never seen a bouncer actually attack someone unless they actively attacked him first. This situation was not the case, so you can try to defend his behavior as much as you want, but clearly dude was acting on his emotions and not the mindset of an actual bouncer.




She continued to instigate and agitate with someone else. As a professional, he should have handled the situation better. She was not directly attacking him so he should not have responded in that nature.

You all can defend his actions as much as you
want, but he was wrong. It was his job to de-escalate the situation in a professional manner, not directly attack a patron as though they posed a threat to him.

At least you admit it was excessive but it was also unnecessary.

 

[Chelsea Bridge]

 

[Chelsea Bridge]

Getting crazy and all up in random men faces may bring consequences you dont like. So, the video backs my point very well. You're just allergic to accountability like most women are and that's alright.

Or maybe you’re allergic to it. Where’s his accountability? Are his actions worthy of being dismissed because you feel like they were justified? Nope.. if he can be excused for his emotional response than her actions should be as well. Especially if you consider the fact she was not attacking him.

I bet if she chose to press charges against him, this video won’t be to his benefit.

 

[Azul]

I bet if she chose to press charges against him, this video won’t be to his benefit.

The experienced attorneys of Breh & Associates will help.

 

[Chelsea Bridge]

The experienced attorneys of Breh & Associates will help.

 

[MikelArteta]

Coli told me Ronda Rousey could beat us up

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

No comments on who is in the wrong/right but it's almost always the same comments or thread trajectory when a woman gets clocked by a dude.

shyt is weird

They love it when women get hit. Love it.

Just go through the thread. Starts off with “yea that bytch shouldn’t have hit him”. It’s damn near 100 posts before someone points out, she never actually hit him.


It quickly changes to... “oh but she was loud talking and fighting women” oh ok. So if women fight around you, punch them in their face huh?


So then it had to change again. “Well they was both wrong. But he wasn’t totally wrong. But he went too far. But she kept swinging”


So let’s watch the next excuse.........


He hit her in the mouth. HER FRIEND DRAGS HER AWAY FROM HIM. At that moment, the problem is deescalated, she’s moving away from him, she’s not even half way conscious

WHY IS HE STILL STANDING NEXT TO HER, 20 FT AWAY? Cause he followed HER after the first punch.

Let me ask. Somebody knock you the fukk out. You come to and that nikka still standing there with his fist balled up.... y’all walking away? Letting him him you 15 more times? Waiting to decide if he’s following you to kill or just calmly make sure you leave?



nikkas got 101 excuses to beat women but no reasons to why they’d stop this. Not their momma, sister, friend. Nope. They was all angels, 24/7 and when they wasn’t, they deserve what’s coming

nikkas is straight clowns. And liars. Ain’t hit a woman them damn selves but become cheerleaders when the next man does.

 

[number21]

Or maybe you’re allergic to it. Where’s his accountability? Are his actions worthy of being dismissed because you feel like they were justified? Nope.. if he can be excused for his emotional response than her actions should be as well. Especially if you consider the fact she was not attacking him.

I bet if she chose to press charges against him, this video won’t be to his benefit.

Where am I excusing his response? Like please show where I said what he did was right or even alright.


But this won't go anywhere because you're going to keep deflecting cause deep down you're one of those women who think that there shouldn't be any consequences for their actions.

 

[calixprynce]

She was wrong , he was "wrong"

so fair game . . the fact that she RAN up on him , shows it was mutual combat and not an assault .

 

[Turbulent]

He can walk away from those women, not his job! Granted, he did warn one of them that he was going to do what he did, but since you brought up his job responsibilities, then he need to learn how to control his temper!

He used excessive force on that woman! What threat did she pose to him? Trust, hitting people is a choice which can be controlled. If he is that impulsive that he can't control his anger, especially against a woman who physically not his match, then he is in the wrong business!

I've never done security so i don't know. I know some members on here have experience. Here's what I'll say. The way i see it, if you are the guy identified as security in a crowded place, and someone tests you and you walk away, especially after you have warned them and given them directions, you will be looked at as food. The other people (who are hyped up and possibly intoxicated) will test you. At that point you are in a WAY more dangerous situation because you lost control of the whole crowd.

As far as if he used too much force... If he was in a 1 on 1 situation at home with his spouse i would have said definitely too much. But again, he is in a crowd seems to be alone or at least outnumbered, doesn't know who will attack him next from behind, and has a tew seconds to make a judgement call in real time while we get to look at the video from the comfort of our home with a broader point of view of what's going on around him and all the time in the world to think about what we would have done. Had he restrained her, his field of vision is narrowed AND his hands are not free. If he hits her, he keeps a broader field of vision so more awareness of what's devolopping around him while keeping his hands free and i will concede that he risks getting the crowd against him and shyt could have gotten ugly. He made the call, i get why he made the call.security is not always simple. It's martial arts, psychology, logistics all in one. Evaluating all options and the risks associated with each, i think he made the right call.

But again, I've never done security so i have no authority to speak on what he should have done.

 

[Chelsea Bridge]

Where am I excusing his response? Like please show where I said what he did was right or even alright.


But this won't go anywhere because you're going to keep deflecting cause deep down you're one of those women who think that there shouldn't be any consequences for their actions.

Ok then. Was he right?

I’m not one of those women. I’m the type that can understand a justifiable situation, but what I’m not is the type to dismiss an egregious action just because I want to emphasize a point, which I believe the responses in this thread is very guilty of doing.

You’re basically saying the other person is not responsible for their actions even if the actions they exhibited is towards someone that did not act towards them.

Is that man supposed to be praised for punching a woman who was focusing on someone else? Or are you saying that he was attempting to derail a situation with excessive force even if it was not needed?

What was the purpose of his actions? Make me understand.

Was it necessary or was it a result of an emotional response that he decided to make her a victim of?

 

[Chelsea Bridge]

They love it when women get hit. Love it.

Just go through the thread. Starts off with “yea that bytch shouldn’t have hit him”. It’s damn near 100 posts before someone points out, she never actually hit him.


It quickly changes to... “oh but she was loud talking and fighting women” oh ok. So if women fight around you, punch them in their face huh?


So then it had to change again. “Well they was both wrong. But he wasn’t totally wrong. But he went too far. But she kept swinging”


So let’s watch the next excuse.........


He hit her in the mouth. HER FRIEND DRAGS HER AWAY FROM HIM. At that moment, the problem is deescalated, she’s moving away from him, she’s not even half way conscious

WHY IS HE STILL STANDING NEXT TO HER, 20 FT AWAY? Cause he followed HER after the first punch.

Let me ask. Somebody knock you the fukk out. You come to and that nikka still standing there with his fist balled up.... y’all walking away? Letting him him you 15 more times? Waiting to decide if he’s following you to kill or just calmly make sure you leave?



nikkas got 101 excuses to beat women but no reasons to why they’d stop this. Not their momma, sister, friend. Nope. They was all angels, 24/7 and when they wasn’t, they deserve what’s coming

nikkas is straight clowns. And liars. Ain’t hit a woman them damn selves but become cheerleaders when the next man does.

This man gets it!!!! Thank you. This thread is disgusting.

 

[AllHolosEve]

Man fukk all this.

I grew up in domestic abuse shyt & I'm with the bouncer. Women thinking they can't get touched needs to stop. Dude clearly was going light.

I damn near got a felony charge over an aggressive female so .

Dude gave warnings too.

 

[ALonelyDad]

He shouldn't have done that, she couldn't even hurt him..no need for punches.


She is stupid too, how you get punched and want to still fightdo you see the size of that man? I would walk home after that

 

[Mr. Jack Napier]

I mean, big man was good with the first blow. The other two hits seemed a bit excessive.

However, shorty is dumb as fukk for not assessing the situation and picking a fight with an individual damn near 3 times her size.

"L"s all around for everyone involved in this video.